Anterior discectomy without interbody fusion for cervical disc herniation, European Spine Journal, vol.16, issue.1, pp.45-51, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1001/archneur.1966.00470100048006
Comparative evaluation of microdiscectomy only, autograft fusion, polymethylmethacrylate interposition, and threaded titanium cage fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease: a prospective randomized study in 125 patients, Neurosurgical Focus, vol.40, issue.1, p.4, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-200011010-00008
fusion with instrumentation required?, British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol.27, issue.5, pp.12-15, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.3171/SPI/2008/8/5/420
THE ANTERIOR APPROACH FOR REMOVAL OF RUPTURED CERVICAL DISKS, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol.6, issue.5, pp.496-511, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.3171/spi.2007.6.5.496
The Treatment of Certain Cervical-Spine Disorders by Anterior Removal of the Intervertebral Disc and Interbody Fusion, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol.40, issue.3, pp.607-624, 1958. ,
DOI : 10.2106/00004623-195840030-00009
Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcome in instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without direct uncovertebral joint decompression, The Spine Journal, vol.4, issue.6, pp.629-635, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.009
Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft, Neurosurgery. févr, vol.50, issue.2, pp.229-236, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1227/00006123-200202000-00001
Radiographic Comparison of Four Anterior Fusion Methods in Two Level Cervical Disc Diseases : Autograft Plate Fixation versus Cage Plate Fixation versus Stand-Alone Cage Fusion versus Corpectomy and Plate Fixation, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, vol.51, issue.3, pp.135-140, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.3340/jkns.2012.51.3.135
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Without Instrumentation, Spine, vol.32, issue.7, pp.772-774, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.brs.0000258846.86537.ad
Anterior Cervical Fusion, Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol.9, issue.3, pp.202-206, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00002517-199606000-00004
Outcome Analysis of Noninstrumented Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion in 348 Patients, Spine, vol.23, issue.2, pp.188-192, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199801150-00008
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. A clinical and biomechanical study with eight-year follow-up, J Bone Joint Surg Br. mai, vol.51, issue.2, pp.225-237, 1969. ,
Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients., The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol.75, issue.9, pp.1298-1307, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.2106/00004623-199309000-00005
Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration, Surg Gynecol Obstet. mai, vol.134, issue.5, pp.755-758, 1972. ,
Anterior Cervical Fusion for Degenerated or Protruded Discs, Spine, vol.9, issue.7, pp.667-671, 1984. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-198410000-00002
The Results of Anterior Interbody Fusion of the Cervical Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery, vol.60, issue.2, pp.127-133, 1969. ,
DOI : 10.2106/00004623-195840030-00009
Relief of Pain by Anterior Cervical-Spine Fusion for Spondylosis, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol.55, issue.3, pp.525-534, 1973. ,
DOI : 10.2106/00004623-197355030-00008
Is Autograft the Gold Standard in Achieving Radiographic Fusion in One-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Rigid Anterior Plate Fixation?, Spine, vol.30, issue.15, pp.1756-1761, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.brs.0000172148.86756.ce
Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvest Donor Site Morbidity, Spine, vol.20, issue.9, pp.1055-1060, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00012
Donor site pain from the ilium. A complication of lumbar spine fusion, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, vol.71, issue.4, pp.677-680, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.1302/0301-620X.71B4.2768321
Pain from donor site after anterior cervical fusion with bone graft: a prospective randomized study with 12??months of follow-up, European Spine Journal, vol.88, issue.Suppl 2, pp.142-147, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.2106/JBJS.E.00984
A prospective randomized study comparing a cervical carbon fiber cage to the Smith???Robinson technique with allograft and plating: up to 24??months follow-up, European Spine Journal, vol.9, issue.2, pp.157-164, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.3171/spi.2003.98.2.0143
Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Femur and Fibular Allografts for the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Diseases, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, vol.53, issue.1, pp.6-12, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.3340/jkns.2013.53.1.6
Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion using PEEK anatomical cervical cage and allograft bone, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, vol.24, issue.2, pp.201-205, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jbm.820240207
URL : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-011-0169-4
Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Freeze-Dried Fibula Allograft, Spine, vol.24, issue.9, pp.852-858, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199905010-00004
A meta-analysis of autograft versus allograft in anterior cervical fusion, European Spine Journal, vol.9, issue.5, pp.398-403, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s005860000160
Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogeneic and allogeneic bone graft substrate: a prospective comparative analysis, Journal of Neurosurgery, vol.17, issue.2, pp.206-210, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199210001-00013
Comparison Between Allograft Plus Demineralized Bone Matrix Versus Autograft in Anterior Cervical Fusion|A Prospective Multicenter Study, Spine, vol.20, issue.Supplement, pp.2211-2216, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199510001-00006
Comparison of allograft to autograft in multilevelanterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid plate fixation, The Spine Journal, vol.3, issue.6, pp.451-459, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S1529-9430(03)00173-6
Long-Term Results After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Allograft and Plating, Spine, vol.30, issue.19, pp.2138-2144, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.brs.0000180479.63092.17
A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of an Anterior Cervical Fusion Cage, Spine, vol.25, issue.20, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-200010150-00017
A prospective randomized comparison of rectangular titanium cage fusion and iliac crest autograft fusion in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol.188, issue.1, pp.1-9, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199107000-00006
Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion Using Polyetheretherketone Cage Filled With Autologous and Synthetic Bone Graft Substrates for Cervical Spondylosis: Comparative Analysis Between PolyBone^|^reg; and Iliac Bone, Neurologia medico-chirurgica, vol.53, issue.2, pp.85-90, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.2176/nmc.53.85
Conclusions:, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, vol.51, issue.01, pp.72-77, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199910150-00014
Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up, European Spine Journal, vol.37, issue.6, pp.1539-1546, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822699fa
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol.8, issue.5, p.172, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.3171/SPI/2008/8/5/420
Comparative Analysis of 3 Different Construct Systems for Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol.26, issue.2, pp.112-118, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318274148e
Radiological analysis of 37 segments in cervical spine implanted with a peek stand-alone device, with at least one year follow-up, British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol.18, issue.430, pp.633-640, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.bsd.0000164198.30725.2d
Ventral Discectomy With PMMA Interbody Fusion for Cervical Disc Disease, Spine, vol.26, issue.3, pp.249-255, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-200102010-00009
Anterior Cervical Discectomy With or Without Fusion With Acrylate, Spine, vol.21, issue.7, pp.834-839, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199604010-00011
Long-Term Follow-Up After Interbody Fusion of the Cervical Spine, Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol.17, issue.2, pp.79-85, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00024720-200404000-00001
Anterior Discectomy and Fusion for Painful Cervical Disc Disease, Spine, vol.23, issue.19, pp.2047-2051, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199810010-00002
Radiculopathy and Myelopathy at Segments Adjacent to the Site of a Previous Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis*, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol.81, issue.4, pp.519-528, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.2106/00004623-199904000-00009
Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels, European Spine Journal, vol.10, issue.4, pp.320-324, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s005860000243
Late Radiographic Findings After Anterior Cervical Fusion for Spondylotic Myeloradiculopathy, Spine, vol.18, issue.15, pp.2167-2173, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199311000-00004
Biomechanical Testing of an Artificial Cervical Joint and an Anterior Cervical Plate, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol.16, issue.4, pp.314-323, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00002
Biomechanical Study on the Effect of Cervical Spine Fusion on Adjacent-Level Intradiscal Pressure and Segmental Motion, Spine, vol.27, issue.22, pp.2431-2434, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00003
Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol.170, issue.2, pp.33-39, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-198409000-00005
Motion Compensation Associated With Single-Level Cervical Fusion: Where Does the Lost Motion Go?, Spine, vol.31, issue.21, pp.2439-2448, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.brs.0000239125.54761.23
Goals of cervical disc replacement, The Spine Journal, vol.4, issue.6, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.023
Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation, European Spine Journal, vol.2, issue.3, pp.432-442, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00301048
Adjacent Level Intradiscal Pressure and Segmental Kinematics Following A Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty, Spine, vol.30, issue.10, pp.1165-1172, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.brs.0000162441.23824.95
History of cervical disc arthroplasty, Neurosurgical Focus, vol.53, issue.3, p.10, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1097/WNQ.0b013e318172f349
Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprothesis in herniated disc and in painful disc, Acta Chir Scand, vol.357, pp.154-159, 1966. ,
Surgical experience with an implanted artificial cervical joint, Journal of Neurosurgery, vol.2, issue.6, pp.943-948, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1002/jbm.820070311
The New Frenchay Artificial Cervical Joint, Spine, vol.27, issue.22, pp.2446-2452, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00006
Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol.1, issue.1, pp.17-21, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(79)90887-0
Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol.55, issue.1, pp.198-209, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00024720-200310000-00002
Intermediate Results of the Prestige LP Cervical Disc Replacement, Spine, vol.36, issue.2, pp.105-111, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d76f99
Cervical Disc Prosthesis in Humans, Spine, vol.26, issue.5, pp.90-92, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-200103010-00005
Wear Analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis, Spine, vol.28, issue.Supplement, pp.186-194, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092212.42388.79
Cervical motion segment replacement, Eur Spine J. oct, vol.11, issue.2, pp.92-97, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-18508-3_4
URL : http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3611568?pdf=render
Preliminary Clinical Experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis, Neurosurgery, vol.115, issue.Suppl 10, pp.840-845, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.115.1.148
Intermediate Follow-up After Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease With the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Single-Level and Bi-Level, Spine, vol.28, issue.24, pp.2673-2678, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA
Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol.96, issue.6, pp.417-423, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00024720-200310000-00002
Comparison of BRYAN Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion, Spine, vol.34, issue.2, pp.101-107, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ee263
Proth??ses discales cervicales, Disponible sur, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0246-0467(11)55229-8
Stress Analysis of the Interface Between Cervical Vertebrae End Plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C Cervical Disc Prostheses, Spine, vol.34, issue.15, pp.1554-1560, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa643b
Delayed Hyper-Reactivity to Metal Ions After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty, Spine, vol.34, issue.7, pp.262-265, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318195dd60
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clarity of the Bryan??, Prodisc-C??, Prestige LP??, and PCM?? Cervical Arthroplasty Devices, Spine, vol.32, issue.6, pp.673-680, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.brs.0000257547.17822.14
Modified Techniques to Prevent Sagittal Imbalance After Cervical Arthroplasty, Spine, vol.32, issue.18, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318133fb99
Sagittal alignment and the Bryan cervical artificial disc, Neurosurgical Focus, vol.30, issue.6, p.14, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00024720-200310000-00002
Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine, European Spine Journal, vol.37, issue.2, pp.20-29, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1001/jama.1958.02990010025006
Segmental Malalignment With the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis???Contributing Factors, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol.20, issue.2, pp.111-117, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211264.20873.78
Postoperative Segmental Malalignment After Surgery With the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol.23, issue.6, pp.372-376, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181bccc69
Biomechanical Analysis of Rotational Motions After Disc Arthroplasty, Spine, vol.31, issue.Suppl, pp.152-160, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.brs.0000234782.89031.03
Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervitech) disc, The Spine Journal, vol.4, issue.6, pp.315-321, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.024
Cervical Disc Replacement???Porous Coated Motion Prosthesis, Spine, vol.28, issue.Supplement, pp.176-185, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092219.28382.0C
Intervertebral Disc Replacement Maintains Cervical Spine Kinetics, Spine, vol.29, issue.24, pp.2809-2814, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.brs.0000147739.42354.a9
Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease, The Spine Journal, vol.9, issue.4, pp.275-286, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.006
ProDisc-C and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion as Surgical Treatment for Single-Level Cervical Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease, Spine, vol.38, issue.3, pp.203-209, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318278eb38
Sagittal Split Fractures in Multilevel Cervical Arthroplasty Using a Keeled Prosthesis, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol.20, issue.1, pp.89-92, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211258.90378.10
Cervical arthroplasty with Discocerv TM « Cervidisc Evolution » surgical procedure and clinical experience 9 years after the first implantation of the first generation. Interactive surgery (Online), pp.187-200, 2008. ,
Remplacement discal cervical total avec la proth??se Discocerv, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, vol.17, issue.6, pp.513-520 ,
DOI : 10.1097/00024720-200404000-00001
Single level cervical arthroplasty with the Discocerv prosthesis: a preliminary report, Acta Orthop Belg. avr, vol.77, issue.2, pp.224-229, 2011. ,
Clinical outcomes with the Prestige II cervical disc: preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial, Neurosurgical Focus, vol.40, issue.3, p.6, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00006
Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C??) with up to 2 years of follow-up, European Spine Journal, vol.96, issue.Suppl 1 ,
DOI : 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.8
Baguera cervical disc prosthesis. Interactive surgery, pp.201-204, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11610-008-0086-2
Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol.96, issue.1, pp.348-358, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.brs.0000180479.63092.17
A comparison of outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with and without radicular symptoms, J Surg Orthop Adv, vol.15, issue.1, pp.24-26, 2006. ,
Centering of Cervical Disc Replacements, Spine, vol.34, issue.15, pp.1572-1577, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa1e87
Monitoring the obesity epidemic in France: the Obepi surveys 1997-2006. Obesity (Silver Spring), sept, vol.16, issue.9, pp.2182-2186, 2008. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00292589
Impact of Smoking on the Outcome of Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis with Interbody or Strut-Grafting, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, vol.83, issue.5, pp.668-673, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.2106/00004623-200105000-00004
Eight-Year Clinical and Radiological Follow-Up of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty, Spine, vol.36, issue.8, pp.639-646, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181dc9b51
Anterior Cervical Pseudarthrosis, Spine, vol.22, issue.14, pp.1585-1589, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199707150-00012
Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.9, p.9173, 2012. ,
A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Results of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for the Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol.95, issue.6, pp.555-561, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.2106/JBJS.K.00599
Quality of life and radiological outcome after cervical cage fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty ,
Utilization trends of cervical artificial disc replacement during the FDA investigational device exemption clinical trials compared to anterior cervical fusion, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol.20, issue.12, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.03.002
A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Outcomes Following Cervical Arthroplasty or Anterior Cervical Fusion, Spine, vol.37, issue.11, pp.943-952, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823da169
Reoperations in Cervical Total Disc Replacement Compared With Anterior Cervical Fusion, Spine, vol.38, issue.14, pp.1177-1182, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828ce774
Cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2012. ,
Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review comparing long-term follow-up results from two FDA trials, Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal, vol.3, issue.S 01, pp.59-66, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1055/s-0031-1298610
Results of Cervical Arthroplasty Compared with Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: Four-Year Clinical Outcomes in a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, vol.93, issue.18, pp.1684-1692, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.2106/JBJS.J.00476
No Justification for Cervical Disk Prostheses in Clinical Practice, Neurosurgery, vol.110, issue.10, pp.1153-1160, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.06.001
Update on the evidence for adjacent segment degeneration and disease, The Spine Journal, vol.13, issue.3, pp.342-351, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.12.009
Adjacent segment disease after cervical spine fusion, Instr Course Lect, vol.58, pp.747-756, 2009. ,
A Kinematic Study of the Cervical Spine Before and After Segmental Arthrodesis, Spine, vol.23, issue.15, pp.1649-1656, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199808010-00006
Adjacent-level biomechanics after single versus multilevel cervical spine fusion, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol.96, issue.1, pp.172-177, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-198610000-00016
Predicting the Risk of Adjacent Segment Pathology in the Cervical Spine, Spine, vol.37, pp.52-64, 1922. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d60fb
Segmental Contribution Toward Total Cervical Range of Motion, Spine, vol.36, issue.25, pp.1593-1599, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31821cfd47
Total disc arthroplasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical spine: results of 93 patients in three prospective randomized clinical trials, The Spine Journal, vol.10, issue.12, pp.1043-1048, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.014
Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after cervical total disc replacement: re-examining the clinical and radiological evidence with established criteria, The Spine Journal, vol.13, issue.1, pp.5-12, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.032
What are the associative factors of adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical spine surgery? Comparative study between anterior cervical fusion and arthroplasty with 5-year follow-up MRI and CT, European Spine Journal, vol.35, issue.5, pp.1078-1089, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d259c1
Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?, The Spine Journal, vol.4, issue.6, pp.190-194, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.007
Does anterior plating of the cervical spine predispose to adjacent segment changes? Spine. 15 déc, pp.2788-2792, 2005. ,
Roentgenographic Findings in the Cervical Spine in Asymptomatic Persons, Spine, vol.26, issue.22, pp.2463-2466, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-200111150-00013
Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Accelerates Adjacent Segment Degeneration, Spine, vol.35, issue.1, pp.36-43, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8a80d
The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials, PLoS ONE, vol.20, issue.4, p.35032, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0035032.s003
Is Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Superior to Fusion for Treatment of Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease? A Meta-Analysis, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol.471, issue.6, pp.1904-1919, 2013. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s11999-013-2830-0
Total disc replacement in the cervical spine: a systematic review evaluating long-term safety, Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal, vol.3, issue.S 01, pp.9-18, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1055/s-0031-1298604
Motion Analysis of Single-Level Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis, Orthopaedic Surgery, vol.4, issue.Suppl., pp.94-100, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.007
Kinematics of the Cervical Adjacent Segments After Disc Arthroplasty Compared With Anterior Discectomy and Fusion, Spine, vol.37, issue.22, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d6628
Adjacent segment disease and C-ADR: promises fulfilled? Evid Based Spine Care, J. févr, vol.3, issue.S1, pp.39-46, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1055/s-0031-1298607
URL : http://europepmc.org/articles/pmc3519401?pdf=render
Cervical arthroplasty: the beginning, the middle, the end?, British Journal of Neurosurgery, vol.30, issue.6, pp.2-6, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.brs.0000175192.55139.69
Qualitative and quantitative assessment of degeneration of cervical intervertebral discs and facet joints, European Spine Journal, vol.16, issue.1, pp.358-369, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.3109/ort.1964.35.suppl-73.01
Clinical Significance of Heterotopic Ossification in Cervical Disc Replacement: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial, Neurosurgery, vol.74, issue.4, pp.759-763, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00194-3
Clinical results and development of heterotopic ossification in total cervical disc replacement during a 4-year follow-up, European Spine Journal, vol.20, issue.2, pp.307-315, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007632-199503010-00004
Prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip replacement with NSAIDs, Pharmacy World and Science, vol.25, issue.4, pp.138-145, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1024830213832
Celecoxib versus indomethacin in the prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty, The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol.19, issue.1, pp.14-18, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00279-1
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Adjacent-Segment Disease: Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Utility of Surgical Intervention, J Spinal Disord Tech. 3 avr, 2013. ,