:. Analyse-des-données-d-'anatomopathologie, 38 3.3.1. Comparaison des données pré-opératoire et post-opératoire en anatomopathologie, p.39

T. Barwick, A. Rockall, D. Barton, and S. Sohaib, Imaging of endometrial adenocarcinoma, Clinical Radiology, vol.61, issue.7, pp.545-55, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.crad.2006.03.011

W. Creasman, C. Morrow, B. Bundy, H. Homesley, J. Graham et al., Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study, Cancer, vol.151, issue.S8, pp.2035-2076, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90371-0

A. Agostini, E. Collette, M. Provansal, J. Estrade, B. Blanc et al., Bonne pratique et valeur diagnostique de l???hyst??roscopie diagnostique et des pr??l??vement histologiques, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.37, issue.8, pp.343-351, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/S0368-2315(08)74774-4

F. Dijkhuizen, B. Mol, H. Brölmann, and A. Heintz, The accuracy of endometrial sampling in the diagnosis of patients with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia, Cancer, vol.78, issue.8, pp.1765-72, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90011-7

H. Critchley, P. Warner, A. Lee, S. Brechin, J. Guise et al., Evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding: comparison of three outpatient procedures within cohorts defined by age and menopausal status, Health Technology Assessment, vol.8, issue.34, pp.1-139, 2004.
DOI : 10.3310/hta8340

S. Bakour, S. Jones, O. Donovan, and P. , Ambulatory hysteroscopy: evidence-based guide to diagnosis and therapy, Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol.20, issue.6, pp.953-75, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.06.004

R. Smith-bindman, K. Kerlikowske, V. Feldstein, L. Subak, J. Scheidler et al., Endovaginal Ultrasound to Exclude Endometrial Cancer and Other Endometrial Abnormalities, JAMA, vol.280, issue.17, pp.1510-1517, 1998.
DOI : 10.1001/jama.280.17.1510

R. Goldstein, R. Bree, C. Benson, B. Benacerraf, J. Bloss et al., Evaluation of the Woman With Postmenopausal Bleeding, Ultrasound Quarterly, vol.18, issue.1, pp.1025-1061, 2001.
DOI : 10.1097/00013644-200203000-00007

K. Kinkel, R. Forstner, F. Danza, L. Oleaga, T. Cunha et al., Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Imaging, European Radiology, vol.186, issue.7
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.162.2.3797641

D. Querleu, F. Planchamp, F. Narducci, P. Morice, F. Joly et al., Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Endometrial Cancer in France, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol.21, issue.5, pp.945-50, 2011.
DOI : 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31821bd473

S. Taïeb, L. Ceugnart, E. Leblanc, C. A. Cabaret, V. Querleu et al., MR imaging of endometrial carcinoma: role and limits], Bull Cancer nov, vol.89, issue.11, pp.963-971, 2002.

E. Sala, A. Rockall, S. Freeman, D. Mitchell, and C. Reinhold, The Added Role of MR Imaging in Treatment Stratification of Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies: What the Radiologist Needs to Know, Radiology, vol.266, issue.3, pp.717-757, 2013.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.12120315

M. Koplay, N. Dogan, H. Erdogan, M. Sivri, C. Erol et al., Diagnostic efficacy of diffusion-weighted MRI for pre-operative assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion and pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma, Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology, vol.188, issue.5, pp.538-584, 2014.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.06.1196

K. Kinkel, R. Forstner, F. Danza, L. Oleaga, T. Cunha et al., Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Imaging, European Radiology, vol.186, issue.7
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.162.2.3797641

Y. Nogami, K. Banno, H. Irie, M. Iida, I. Kisu et al., The efficacy of preoperative positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and endometrial cancer: clinical and pathological factors influencing it, Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.373, issue.9658, pp.26-34, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61766-3

J. Park, E. Kim, D. Kim, D. Suh, J. Kim et al., Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.108, issue.3, pp.486-92, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.044

K. Kitajima, Y. Suenaga, Y. Ueno, T. Maeda, Y. Ebina et al., Preoperative risk stratification using metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with endometrial cancer, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2 avr, 2015.

Y. Nishiyama, Y. Yamamoto, K. Kanenishi, M. Ohno, T. Hata et al., Monitoring the neoadjuvant therapy response in gynecological cancer patients using FDG PET, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol.5, issue.2, pp.287-95, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/s00259-007-0627-7

T. Saga, T. Higashi, T. Ishimori, M. Mamede, Y. Nakamoto et al., Clinical value of FDG-PET in the follow up of post-operative patients with endometrial cancer, Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol.82, issue.3, pp.197-203, 2003.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.176.6.1761449

T. Belhocine, D. Barsy, C. Hustinx, R. Willems-foidart, and J. , Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in the post-therapy surveillance of endometrial carcinoma, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol.29, issue.9, pp.1132-1141, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/s00259-002-0878-2

J. Park, E. Kim, D. Kim, J. Kim, Y. Kim et al., Clinical impact of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the posttherapy surveillance of endometrial carcinoma: evaluation of 88 patients, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol.18, issue.6, pp.1332-1340, 2008.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2008.01197.x

S. Jolly, C. Vargas, T. Kumar, S. Weiner, D. Brabbins et al., The impact of age on long-term outcome in patients with endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.103, issue.1, pp.87-93, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.01.038

J. Lachance, E. Everett, B. Greer, L. Mandel, E. Swisher et al., The effect of age on clinical/pathologic features, surgical morbidity, and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.101, issue.3, pp.470-475, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.11.009

. Astec-study-group, H. Kitchener, A. Swart, Q. Qian, C. Amos et al., Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study, Lancet. 10 janv, vol.373, issue.9658, pp.125-161, 2009.

J. Cragun, L. Havrilesky, B. Calingaert, I. Synan, A. Secord et al., Retrospective Analysis of Selective Lymphadenectomy in Apparent Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.23, issue.16, pp.3668-75, 2005.
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.144

H. Watari, T. Mitamura, M. Moriwaki, M. Hosaka, Y. Ohba et al., Survival and Failure Pattern of Patients With Endometrial Cancer After Extensive Surgery Including Systematic Pelvic and Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Followed by Adjuvant Chemotherapy, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol.22, issue.9
DOI : 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a833cc

Y. Inoue, K. Obata, K. Abe, G. Ohmura, K. Doh et al., The prognostic significance of vascular invasion by endometrial carcinoma, Cancer, vol.72, issue.7, pp.1447-51, 1996.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1965.tb00082.x

H. Mahdi, A. Jernigan, B. Nutter, C. Michener, and P. Rose, Lymph node metastasis and pattern of recurrence in clinically early stage endometrial cancer with positive lymphovascular space invasion, Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, vol.26, issue.3, 2015.
DOI : 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.3.208

J. Briët, H. Hollema, N. Reesink, J. Aalders, M. Mourits et al., Lymphvascular space involvement: an independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.96, issue.3, pp.799-804, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.11.033

O. Gemer, A. Arie, T. Levy, M. Gdalevich, M. Lorian et al., Lymphvascular space involvement compromises the survival of patients with stage I endometrial cancer: Results of a multicenter study, European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO), vol.33, issue.5, pp.644-651, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.01.009

H. Hahn, I. Lee, T. Kim, K. Lee, J. Shim et al., Lymphovascular space invasion is highly associated with lymph node metastasis and recurrence in endometrial cancer, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol.55, issue.3, pp.293-300, 2013.
DOI : 10.1002/1097-0142(19850415)55:8<1753::AID-CNCR2820550823>3.0.CO;2-P

T. Burke, C. Levenback, C. Tornos, M. Morris, J. Wharton et al., Intraabdominal Lymphatic Mapping to Direct Selective Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Women with High- Risk Endometrial Cancer: Results of a Pilot Study, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.62, issue.2
DOI : 10.1006/gyno.1996.0211

F. Lécuru, K. Neji, F. Robin, C. Darles, P. De-bièvre et al., Lymphatic drainage of the uterus. Preliminary results of an experimental study], J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod, vol.26, issue.4, pp.418-441, 1997.

P. Benedetti-panici, S. Basile, F. Maneschi, A. Lissoni, A. Signorelli et al., Systematic Pelvic Lymphadenectomy vs No Lymphadenectomy in Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma: Randomized Clinical Trial, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol.12, issue.23, pp.1707-1723, 2008.
DOI : 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1800

K. May, A. Bryant, H. Dickinson, S. Kehoe, and J. Morrison, Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.12, issue.2, p.7585, 2010.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00618.x

D. Querleu, E. Leblanc, G. Cartron, F. Narducci, G. Ferron et al., Audit of preoperative and early complications of laparoscopic lymph node dissection in 1000 gynecologic cancer patients, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.195, issue.5, pp.1287-92, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.043

O. Akbayir, A. Corbacioglu, C. Numanoglu, F. Guleroglu, V. Ulker et al., Preoperative assessment of myometrial and cervical invasion in endometrial carcinoma by transvaginal ultrasound, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.122, issue.3, pp.600-603, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.041

C. Bonneau, A. Bricou, and E. Barranger, Current position of the sentinel lymph node procedure in endometrial cancer]. Bull Cancer (Paris), févr, vol.98, issue.2, pp.133-178, 2011.

C. Touboul, E. Bentivegna, C. Uzan, S. Gouy, P. Pautier et al., Sentinel Lymph Node in Endometrial Cancer: A Review, Current Oncology Reports, vol.27, issue.Suppl 1, pp.559-65, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.10.039

J. Barlin, R. Soslow, M. Lutz, Q. Zhou, S. Clair et al., Redefining Stage I Endometrial Cancer, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol.23, issue.9, pp.1620-1628, 2013.
DOI : 10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182a5055e

URL : http://pdfs.journals.lww.com/ijgc/2013/11000/Redefining_Stage_I_Endometrial_Cancer_.13.pdf?token=method|ExpireAbsolute;source|Journals;ttl|1503245979124;payload|mY8D3u1TCCsNvP5E421JYK6N6XICDamxByyYpaNzk7FKjTaa1Yz22MivkHZqjGP4kdS2v0J76WGAnHACH69s21Csk0OpQi3YbjEMdSoz2UhVybFqQxA7lKwSUlA502zQZr96TQRwhVlocEp/sJ586aVbcBFlltKNKo+tbuMfL73hiPqJliudqs17cHeLcLbV/CqjlP3IO0jGHlHQtJWcICDdAyGJMnpi6RlbEJaRheGeh5z5uvqz3FLHgPKVXJzd/ZT9/F3400cjIVHfQbm7bnHgskpuCBOZ43GnqE53t6U=;hash|HLr4HWjH/Ttn8qQR9oRZZQ==

L. Savelli, M. Ceccarini, M. Ludovisi, E. Fruscella, D. Iaco et al., Preoperative local staging of endometrial cancer: transvaginal sonography vs. magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.17, issue.5, pp.560-566, 2008.
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747

M. Frumovitz, D. Singh, L. Meyer, D. Smith, I. Wertheim et al., Predictors of final histology in patients with endometrial cancer, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.95, issue.3, pp.463-471, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.016

M. Leitao, S. Kehoe, R. Barakat, K. Alektiar, L. Gattoc et al., Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy accuracy in patients with FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.113, issue.1, pp.105-113, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.017

N. Neubauer, L. Havrilesky, B. Calingaert, A. Bulusu, M. Bernardini et al., The role of lymphadenectomy in the management of preoperative grade 1 endometrial carcinoma, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.112, issue.3, pp.511-517, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.11.012

A. Scholten, V. Smit, H. Beerman, W. Van-putten, and C. Creutzberg, Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma, Cancer, vol.51, issue.4, pp.764-72, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4757-3889-6_12

S. Nofech-mozes, N. Ismiil, V. Dubé, R. Saad, Z. Ghorab et al., Interobserver Agreement for Endometrial Cancer Characteristics Evaluated on Biopsy Material, Obstetrics and Gynecology International, vol.67, issue.5-6, p.414086, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.010

L. Helpman, R. Kupets, A. Covens, R. Saad, M. Khalifa et al., Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer, British Journal of Cancer, vol.70, issue.3, pp.609-624, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/s00330-012-2609-9

G. Eltabbakh, J. Shamonki, and S. Mount, Surgical stage, final grade, and survival of women with endometrial carcinoma whose preoperative endometrial biopsy shows well-differentiated tumors, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.99, issue.2, pp.309-321, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.06.010

J. Mitchard and L. Hirschowitz, Concordance of FIGO grade of endometrial adenocarcinomas in biopsy and hysterectomy specimens, Histopathology, vol.68, issue.4, pp.372-380, 2003.
DOI : 10.1006/gyno.1999.5422

X. Wang, Z. Huang, W. Di, and Q. Lin, Comparison of D&C and hysterectomy pathologic findings in endometrial cancer patients, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol.12, issue.Suppl 10, pp.136-177, 2005.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb02427.x

R. Taylor, J. Zeller, R. Lieberman, O. Connor, and D. , An Analysis of Two versus Three Grades for Endometrial Carcinoma, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.74, issue.1, pp.3-6, 1999.
DOI : 10.1006/gyno.1999.5422

S. Lax, R. Kurman, E. Pizer, L. Wu, and B. Ronnett, A Binary Architectural Grading System for Uterine Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma Has Superior Reproducibility Compared With FIGO Grading and Identifies Subsets of Advance-Stage Tumors With Favorable and Unfavorable Prognosis, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol.24, issue.9, pp.1201-1209, 2000.
DOI : 10.1097/00000478-200009000-00002

E. Sala, S. Wakely, E. Senior, and D. Lomas, MRI of Malignant Neoplasms of the Uterine Corpus and Cervix, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.188, issue.6, pp.1577-87, 2007.
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.06.1196

R. Manfredi, P. Mirk, G. Maresca, P. Margariti, A. Testa et al., Local-Regional Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma: Role of MR Imaging in Surgical Planning, Radiology, vol.231, issue.2, pp.372-380, 2004.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2312021184

O. Ortashi, S. Jain, O. Emannuel, R. Henry, A. Wood et al., Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for staging endometrial cancer, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.137, issue.2, pp.232-237, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.02.029

S. Cabrita, H. Rodrigues, R. Abreu, M. Martins, L. Teixeira et al., Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma, Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, vol.29, issue.2, pp.135-142, 2008.

S. Antonsen, L. Jensen, A. Loft, A. Berthelsen, J. Costa et al., MRI, PET/CT and ultrasound in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer ??? A multicenter prospective comparative study, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.128, issue.2, pp.300-308, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.11.025

L. Scoutt, S. Mccarthy, S. Flynn, R. Lange, F. Long et al., Clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma: pitfalls in preoperative assessment with MR imaging. Work in progress., Radiology, vol.194, issue.2, pp.567-72, 1995.
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.194.2.7824739

S. Ascher and C. Reinhold, Imaging of cancer of the endometrium, Radiologic Clinics of North America, vol.40, issue.3, pp.563-76, 2002.
DOI : 10.1016/S0033-8389(01)00013-6

Y. Yamashita, M. Harada, T. Sawada, M. Takahashi, K. Miyazaki et al., Normal uterus and FIGO stage I endometrial carcinoma: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging., Radiology, vol.186, issue.2, pp.495-501, 1993.
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421757

G. Rauch, H. Kaur, H. Choi, R. Ernst, A. Klopp et al., Optimization of MR Imaging for Pretreatment Evaluation of Patients with Endometrial and Cervical Cancer, RadioGraphics, vol.34, issue.4, pp.1082-98, 2014.
DOI : 10.1148/rg.344140001

G. Lin, K. Ng, C. Chang, J. Wang, K. Ho et al., Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Diagnostic Accuracy of Diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR Imaging???Initial Experience, Radiology, vol.250, issue.3, pp.784-92, 2009.
DOI : 10.1148/radiol.2503080874

H. Seki, T. Takano, and K. Sakai, Value of Dynamic MR Imaging in Assessing Endometrial Carcinoma Involvement of the Cervix, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.175, issue.1, pp.171-177, 2000.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750171

S. Jantarasaengaram, N. Praditphol, T. Tansathit, C. Vipupinyo, and K. Vairojanavong, Three-dimensional ultrasound with volume contrast imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion and cervical involvement in women with endometrial cancer, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.106, issue.Suppl 1, pp.569-74, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.05.033

J. Alcázar and M. Jurado, Three-dimensional ultrasound for assessing women with gynecological cancer: A systematic review, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.120, issue.3, pp.340-346, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.10.023

N. Boran, D. Akdag, F. Halici, G. Tulunay, T. Turan et al., A Retrospective Analysis of the Diameter of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Apparently Early Stage Endometrial Cancer, Tumori Journal, vol.106, issue.2, pp.681-686, 2008.
DOI : 10.1097/00006250-200508000-00050

H. Pelikan, J. Trum, F. Bakers, R. Beets-tan, L. Smits et al., Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tests for lymph node status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review, Cancer Imaging, vol.13, issue.3, pp.314-336, 2013.
DOI : 10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0032

N. Horowitz, F. Dehdashti, T. Herzog, J. Rader, M. Powell et al., Prospective evaluation of FDG-PET for detecting pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine corpus cancer, Gynecologic Oncology, vol.95, issue.3, pp.546-51, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.08.009

D. Nayot, J. Kwon, M. Carey, and A. Driedger, Does preoperative positron emission tomography with computed tomography predict nodal status in endometrial cancer? A pilot study, Curr Oncol Tor Ont. juin, vol.15, issue.3, pp.123-128, 2008.

E. Raimond, G. Canlorbe, S. Bendifallah, D. Hudry, F. Selvi et al., Endometrial carcinoma. Application of the guidelines of 2010: multicentre trial], Bull Cancer (Paris). août, vol.101, issue.78, pp.703-716, 2014.

E. Daraï, C. Zacharopoulou, C. Touboul, E. Chéreau, and M. Ballester, [Sentinel node procedure and endometrial cancer: senti-endo results], Bull Cancer (Paris). janv, vol.99, issue.1, pp.35-41, 2012.

A. Rockall, S. Sohaib, M. Harisinghani, S. Babar, N. Singh et al., Diagnostic Performance of Nanoparticle-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Endometrial and Cervical Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol.23, issue.12
DOI : 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.166

M. Nikolaou, H. Kourea, V. Tzelepi, G. Adonakis, C. Scopa et al., The prognostic role of preoperative serum CA 125 levels in patients with endometrial carcinoma, J BUON Off J Balk Union Oncol. mars, vol.19, issue.1, pp.198-202, 2014.

J. Powell, K. Hill, B. Shiro, S. Diehl, and W. Gajewski, Preoperative serum CA-125 levels in treating endometrial cancer, J Reprod Med. août, vol.50, issue.8, pp.585-90, 2005.

S. Antonsen, E. Høgdall, I. Christensen, M. Lydolph, A. Tabor et al., HE4 and CA125 levels in the preoperative assessment of endometrial cancer patients: a prospective multicenter study (ENDOMET), Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol.18, issue.11, pp.1313-1335, 2013.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00996.x