48 A. Patients inclus, p.48 ,
Contrast enhanced spiral computerized tomography in live kidney donors: a single session for anatomical and functional assessment, J.Urol, vol.171, issue.1, pp.31-34, 2004. ,
Simultaneous evaluation of renal morphology and function in live kidney donors using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, Nephrol. Dial. Transplant, 2010. ,
MRU post-processing, Pediatric Radiology, vol.91, issue.3, pp.18-27, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1038/jcbfm.1983.1
In Vitro Assessment of a 3D Segmentation Algorithm Based on the Belief Functions Theory in Calculating Renal Volumes by MRI, American Journal of Roentgenology, vol.191, issue.3, pp.127-134, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.2214/AJR.07.3063
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00472947
MR imaging of kidneys: functional evaluation using F-15 perfusion imaging, Pediatric Radiology, vol.142, issue.5, pp.293-304, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.142.3.619
Assessment of Renal Function with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, vol.16, issue.4, pp.597-611, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mric.2008.07.001
Prospective study comparing three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors, BJU International, vol.10, issue.7, pp.961105-961113, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05107.x
Evaluation of renal arteries in living renal donors: comparison between MDCT angiography and gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography, Radiation Medicine, vol.207, issue.9, pp.617-641, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530313
??valuation pr??op??ratoire du nombre de vaisseaux chez le donneur de rein vivant. La TDM est-elle sup??rieure ?? l???IRM???, Progr??s en Urologie, vol.21, issue.1, pp.34-43, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.purol.2010.05.013
Gadofosveset-Enhanced MR Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Potential Living Kidney Donors: Correlation with Intraoperative Findings, R??Fo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der R??ntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, vol.182, issue.11, pp.1001-1010, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1055/s-0029-1245685
Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the Sole Radiological Assessment for Living Donor Nephrectomy, Urologia Internationalis, vol.84, issue.1, pp.56-60, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1159/000273467
Techniques to optimize vascular control during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, Urology, vol.61, issue.1, pp.93-100, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02133-7
Complications of Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy and Their Management: The UCLA Experience, Urology, vol.69, issue.1, pp.49-52, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.030
ENDOVASCULAR GASTROINTESTINAL STAPLER DEVICE MALFUNCTION DURING LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY: EARLY RECOGNITION AND MANAGEMENT, The Journal of Urology, vol.164, issue.2, pp.319-340, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67349-1
Chylous Ascites Requiring Surgical Intervention after Donor Nephrectomy: Case Series and Single Center Experience, J. Aerts, Am J Transplant, vol.10, pp.124-128, 2010. ,
Dujardin, postoperative chylous ascites in urology, Prog Urol, vol.15, issue.6, pp.1312-1320, 2005. ,
Chyloretroperitoneum with secondary chylothorax after retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy, Urology, vol.66, issue.4, p.881, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.025
Chylous Ascites after Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy, Journal of Endourology, vol.19, issue.7, pp.839-879, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1089/end.2005.19.839
Chylous ascites as a complication of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, Transplant International, vol.121, issue.1, pp.1378-81, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.03.022
Chylous ascites: A collective review, Surgery, vol.128, issue.5, pp.761-78, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1067/msy.2000.109502
Impact of Graft Mass on the Clinical Outcome of Kidney Transplants, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol.16, issue.1, pp.261-268, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1681/ASN.2004030209
Prediction of post-operative glomerular filtration rate after nephrectomy for renal malignancy, Clinical Physiology, vol.10, issue.6, pp.688-692, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.3109/00365597609179672
Le devenir du donneur vivant, N??phrologie & Th??rapeutique, vol.4, issue.1, pp.67-6874, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.nephro.2007.07.016
Proteinuria and reduced kidney function in living kidney donors: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression, Kidney International, vol.70, issue.10 ,
DOI : 10.1038/sj.ki.5001819
Evaluation of the Potential Living Kidney Donor, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol.50, issue.6, pp.1043-1051, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.08.022
Meta-Analysis: Risk for Hypertension in Living Kidney Donors, Annals of Internal Medicine, vol.145, issue.3, pp.1801-1810, 2006. ,
DOI : 10.7326/0003-4819-145-3-200608010-00006
Anatomic abnormalities of cadaver kidneys procured for purpose of transplantation, Am surg, vol.52, pp.233-235, 1986. ,
Transplantation of kidneys with multiples renal arteries, Transpl proc, vol.16, p.273, 1984. ,
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Transplants with Multiple Renal Arteries, Annals of Surgery, vol.221, issue.4, pp.406-414, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00000658-199504000-00012
Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and multiple renal arteries, The American Journal of Surgery, vol.176, issue.6, pp.559-563, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00260-8
Living Donor Kidney Transplantation With Multiple Renal Arteries in the Laparoscopic Era, Urology, vol.77, issue.5, pp.1116-1137, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.503
Routine left robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is safe and effective regardless of the presence of vascular anomalies, Transplant International, vol.221, issue.8 ,
DOI : 10.1097/00000658-200105000-00008
LAPAROSCOPIC LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMY???IS IT SAFE?, Transplantation, vol.70, issue.4, p.602, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007890-200008270-00012
URL : http://pdfs.journals.lww.com/transplantjournal/2000/08270/LAPAROSCOPIC_LIVE_DONOR_NEPHRECTOMY_IS_IT_SAFE__.12.pdf?token=method|ExpireAbsolute;source|Journals;ttl|1505584497592;payload|mY8D3u1TCCsNvP5E421JYK6N6XICDamxByyYpaNzk7FKjTaa1Yz22MivkHZqjGP4kdS2v0J76WGAnHACH69s21Csk0OpQi3YbjEMdSoz2UhVybFqQxA7lKwSUlA502zQZr96TQRwhVlocEp/sJ586aVbcBFlltKNKo+tbuMfL73hiPqJliudqs17cHeLcLbV/CqjlP3IO0jGHlHQtJWcICDdAyGJMnpi6RlbEJaRheGeh5z5uvqz3FLHgPKVXJzdGlb2qsojlvlytk14LkMXSK5mEXA8nJqHe8IU3caUr+1hMmdTr+VW8k+a74I0EgVY;hash|zUBlUG7CnpqjWJseUFuRYg==
PROSPECTIVE, CASE MATCHED COMPARISON OF HAND ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN SURGICAL LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMY, The Journal of Urology, vol.163, issue.6, p.1650, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67513-1
SHOULD THE INDICATIONS FOR LAPARASCOPIC LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMY OF THE RIGHT KIDNEY BE THE SAME AS FOR THE OPEN PROCEDURE? ANOMALOUS LEFT RENAL VASCULATURE IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION TO LAPAROSCOPIC LEFT DONOR NEPHRECTOMY1, Transplantation, vol.71, issue.5, pp.71660-71664, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007890-200103150-00015
Laparoscopic Right Donor Nephrectomy: A Large Single-Center Experience, Transplantation, vol.78, issue.11, pp.78-1665, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.TP.0000144320.33956.42
URL : http://pdfs.journals.lww.com/transplantjournal/2004/12150/Laparoscopic_Right_Donor_Nephrectomy__A_Large.15.pdf?token=method|ExpireAbsolute;source|Journals;ttl|1503987211240;payload|mY8D3u1TCCsNvP5E421JYK6N6XICDamxByyYpaNzk7FKjTaa1Yz22MivkHZqjGP4kdS2v0J76WGAnHACH69s21Csk0OpQi3YbjEMdSoz2UhVybFqQxA7lKwSUlA502zQZr96TQRwhVlocEp/sJ586aVbcBFlltKNKo+tbuMfL73hiPqJliudqs17cHeLcLbV/CqjlP3IO0jGHlHQtJWcICDdAyGJMnpi6RlbEJaRheGeh5z5uvqz3FLHgPKVXJzdGlb2qsojlvlytk14LkMXSGkQ4vF17lO12SekryYYk6BODEb96mhOPOlxGUhMsYXy;hash|1EJicTncVenhKPDpTkFJxg==
Laparoscopic procurement of kidney Transplantation, pp.1665-1674, 2004. ,
Left or Right Kidney in Hand-Assisted Donor Nephrectomy? A Randomized Controlled Trial, Transplantation, vol.85, issue.2, pp.203-211, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181601486
Right-sided laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: Is reluctance still justified?, Transplantation, vol.74, issue.7, pp.1045-1053, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007890-200210150-00025
URL : http://pdfs.journals.lww.com/transplantjournal/2002/10150/Right_sided_laparoscopic_live_donor_nephrectomy_.25.pdf?token=method|ExpireAbsolute;source|Journals;ttl|1507159120492;payload|mY8D3u1TCCsNvP5E421JYK6N6XICDamxByyYpaNzk7FKjTaa1Yz22MivkHZqjGP4kdS2v0J76WGAnHACH69s21Csk0OpQi3YbjEMdSoz2UhVybFqQxA7lKwSUlA502zQZr96TQRwhVlocEp/sJ586aVbcBFlltKNKo+tbuMfL73hiPqJliudqs17cHeLcLbV/CqjlP3IO0jGHlHQtJWcICDdAyGJMnpi6RlbEJaRheGeh5z5uvqz3FLHgPKVXJzdGlb2qsojlvlytk14LkMXSPGsMWDWdLA49lygqoZnBQjwKiRxrhiWUhx7xUmGYwbi;hash|3Zz53BVBcbZw7HyAOVkK/A==
Laparoscopic nephrectomy in the markedly obese living renal donor, Urology, vol.56, issue.6, pp.926-935, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00813-X
Obesity in Living Kidney Donors: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in the Era of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy, American Journal of Transplantation, vol.26, issue.5, pp.1057-64, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00506.x
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in obese donors: easier to implement in overweight women?, Transplant International, vol.81, issue.6, pp.956-61, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1097/00007890-200210150-00025
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, Surgical Endoscopy, vol.45, issue.4, pp.521-527, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00464-006-9021-y
Comparison of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy Versus Conventional Laparoscopy on Skill Acquisition and Performance, Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.54, issue.3, pp.376-81, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31822b46f6
Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?, Urology, vol.60, issue.1, pp.39-45, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01717-X
Robotically assisted donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation, The American Journal of Surgery, vol.188, issue.4, pp.45-51, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.028
Quality of Life, Pain and Return to Normal Activities Following Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Versus Open Mini-Incision Donor Nephrectomy, The Journal of Urology, vol.169, issue.6, pp.2018-2021, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1097/01.ju.0000067975.59772.b6
Incentives for Living Kidney Donation: What Does the Public Think?, Transplantation, vol.86, issue.4, pp.500-501, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1097/TP.0b013e318181fdba