B. Blondel, N. Lelong, M. Kermarrec, and F. Goffinet, La sant?? p??rinatale en France m??tropolitaine de 1995???? 2010. R??sultats des enqu??tes nationales p??rinatales, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.2, pp.151-66, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2011.11.008

C. Deneux-tharaux, Ut??rus cicatriciel??: aspects ??pid??miologiques, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.8, pp.697-707, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.022

M. Zimbeck, A. Mohangoo, J. Zeitlin, and E. Committee, The European perinatal health report: Delivering comparable data for examining differences in maternal and infant health, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.146, issue.2, pp.149-51, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.07.017

C. Cameron, C. Roberts, and B. Peat, Predictors of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol.322, issue.(7294), pp.267-276, 2004.
DOI : 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1089

. Acog-practice-bulletin, Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. août, vol.566, issue.22, pp.197-204, 1998.

D. Gallot, A. Delabaere, F. Desvignes, C. Vago, M. Accoceberry et al., Quelles sont les recommandations d???organisation et d???information en cas de proposition de tentative de voie basse pour ut??rus cicatriciel???, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.8, pp.782-789, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.031

J. Guise, M. Berlin, M. Mcdonagh, P. Osterweil, B. Chan et al., Safety of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Systematic Review, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.103, issue.3, pp.420-429, 2004.
DOI : 10.1097/01.AOG.0000116259.41678.f1

O. Parant, Modalit??s de la c??sarienne programm??e sur ut??rus cicatriciel, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.8, pp.822-825, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.037

J. Haumonté, M. Raylet, L. Sabiani, O. Franké, F. Bretelle et al., Quels facteurs influencent la voie d???accouchement en cas de tentative de voie basse sur ut??rus cicatriciel???, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.8, pp.735-52, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.032

O. Parant, Rupture ut??rine??: pr??diction, diagnostic et prise en charge, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.8, pp.803-819, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.036

W. Grobman, Y. Lai, M. Landon, C. Spong, K. Leveno et al., Development of a Nomogram for Prediction of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.109, issue.4
DOI : 10.1097/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02

M. Landon, S. Leindecker, C. Spong, J. Hauth, S. Bloom et al., The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.193, issue.3, pp.1016-1039, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.066

M. Landon, J. Hauth, K. Leveno, C. Spong, S. Leindecker et al., Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery, New England Journal of Medicine, vol.351, issue.25, pp.2581-2590, 2004.
DOI : 10.1056/NEJMoa040405

G. Beucher, P. Dolley, S. Lévy-thissier, A. Florian, and M. Dreyfus, B??n??fices et risques maternels de la tentative de voie basse compar??e ?? la c??sarienne programm??e en cas d???ant??c??dent de c??sarienne, Journal de Gyn??cologie Obst??trique et Biologie de la Reproduction, vol.41, issue.8, pp.708-734, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.028

L. Sentilhes, C. Vayssière, G. Beucher, C. Deneux-tharaux, P. Deruelle et al., Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF), European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.170, issue.1, pp.25-32, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inserm-00917305

. Society, . Obstetricians, . Gynaecologists, and . Canada, SOGC clinical practice guidelines Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth, Number Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. juin, vol.15589, issue.3, pp.319-350, 2005.

B. Flamm and A. Geiger, Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery: An Admission Scoring System, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.90, issue.6, pp.907-917, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00531-0

S. Srinivas, D. Stamilio, E. Stevens, A. Odibo, J. Peipert et al., Predicting Failure of a Vaginal Birth Attempt After Cesarean Delivery, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.109, issue.4, pp.800-805, 2007.
DOI : 10.1097/01.AOG.0000259313.46842.71

E. Bujold, S. Blackwell, I. Hendler, S. Berman, Y. Sorokin et al., Modified Bishop's score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.191, issue.5, pp.1644-1652, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.075

D. Weinstein, A. Benshushan, V. Tanos, R. Zilberstein, and N. Rojansky, Predictive score for vaginal birth after cesarean section, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.174, issue.1, pp.192-200, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70393-9

R. Pattinson, Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at or near term, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.179, issue.3, p.161, 2000.
DOI : 10.2214/ajr.179.1.1790137

R. Gonen, A. Tamir, S. Degani, and G. Ohel, Variables Associated with Successful Vaginal Birth after One Cesarean Section: A Proposed Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section Score, American Journal of Perinatology, vol.21, issue.08, pp.447-53, 2004.
DOI : 10.1055/s-2004-835961

J. Hashima and J. Guise, Vaginal birth after cesarean: a prenatal scoring tool, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.196, issue.5, pp.22-25, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.884

L. Troyer and V. Parisi, Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: Designation of a scoring system, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.167, issue.4, pp.1099-104, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/S0002-9378(12)80046-9

M. Costantine, K. Fox, B. Byers, J. Mateus, L. Ghulmiyyah et al., Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

N. Chaillet, E. Bujold, E. Dubé, and W. Grobman, Validation of a Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth After Caesarean, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, vol.35, issue.2, pp.119-143, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)31015-X

A. Yokoi, K. Ishikawa, K. Miyazaki, K. Yoshida, M. Furuhashi et al., Validation of the Prediction Model for Success of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery in Japanese Women, International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.9, issue.6, pp.488-91, 2012.
DOI : 10.7150/ijms.4682

M. Fagerberg, K. Mar?ál, and K. Källén, Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.188, pp.88-94, 2015.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.031

F. Mone, C. Harrity, A. Mackie, R. Segurado, B. Toner et al., Vaginal birth after caesarean section prediction models: a UK comparative observational study, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol.193
DOI : 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.07.024

D. Horey, M. Kealy, M. Davey, R. Small, and C. Crowther, Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean. [cité 31 juill 2015]; Disponible sur

J. Guise, K. Eden, C. Emeis, M. Denman, N. Marshall et al., Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights, Evid ReportTechnology Assess. mars, issue.191, pp.1-397, 2010.
DOI : 10.1097/01.aoa.0000400303.64066.25