S. Ansari, J. Reinecke, and A. Spaan, How are Practices Made to Vary? Managing Practice Adaptation in a Multinational Corporation, Organization Studies, vol.6, issue.13, pp.1313-1341, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.07.009

URL : http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/62148/1/WRAP_%20Reinecke_0972924-wbs-221014-ansari_reinecke_spaan_practices_ace_org_studies_2014_final_version_1.pdf

N. Beck and P. Walgenbach, Technical Efficiency or Adaptation to Institutionalized Expectations? The Adoption of ISO 9000 Standards in the German Mechanical Engineering Industry, Organization Studies, vol.42, issue.6, pp.841-866, 2005.
DOI : 10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.002303

A. Binder, For love and money: Organizations??? creative responses to multiple environmental logics, Theory and Society, vol.49, issue.1, pp.547-571, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s11186-007-9045-x

A. Bonaccorsi, Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science, Minerva, vol.30, issue.1, pp.285-315, 2008.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511541391

A. Bonaccorsi and G. Thoma, Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology, Research Policy, vol.36, issue.6, pp.813-831, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.009

URL : http://web.unicam.it/archivio/eventi/incontri_convegni/Unicam_Innovazione/documenti/bonaccorsi_thoma_rp2007.pdf

A. Bonaccorsi and J. Vargas, Proliferation dynamics in new sciences, Research Policy, vol.39, issue.8, pp.1034-1050, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.002

E. Boxenbaum, Lost in Translation, American Behavioral Scientist, vol.74, issue.7, 2006.
DOI : 10.2307/2095581

, American Behavioral Scientist, vol.49, pp.939-948

E. Boxenbaum and S. Jonsson, Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling: Concept Evolution and Theoretical Challenges
DOI : 10.4135/9781446280669.n4

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01488051

, The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp.57-113

B. Bozeman, P. Laredo, and V. Mangematin, Understanding the emergence and deployment of ???nano??? S&T, Research Policy, vol.36, issue.6, pp.807-812, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.010

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00424523

P. Bromley, H. Hwang, and W. W. Powell, Decoupling revisited: Common pressures, divergent strategies in the U. S. nonprofit sector, M@n@gement, vol.15, issue.5, pp.469-501, 2012.
DOI : 10.3917/mana.155.0469

P. Bromley and W. W. Powell, From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World, Academy of Management Annals, vol.6, issue.1, pp.483-530, 2012.
DOI : 10.5465/19416520.2012.684462

D. E. Chubin, State of the Field The Conceptualization of Scientific Specialties, The Sociological Quarterly, vol.41, issue.4, pp.448-476, 1976.
DOI : 10.1086/267989

S. R. Clegg and M. Kornberger, Rediscovering space, Space, Orgnizations and Management Theory, pp.8-16, 2006.

D. Crilly, M. Zollo, and M. T. Hansen, Faking It or Muddling Through? Understanding Decoupling in Response to Stakeholder Pressures, Academy of Management Journal, vol.55, issue.6, pp.1429-1448, 2012.
DOI : 10.5465/amj.2010.0697

F. De-vaujany and N. Mitev, Space in organizations and sociomateriality, 2013.

, Materiality and space: Organizations, artefacts and practices (pp. 1?21)

P. Dick, From Rational Myth to Self-Fulfilling Prophecy? Understanding the Persistence of Means???ends Decoupling as a Consequence of the Latent Functions of Policy Enactment, Organization Studies, vol.51, issue.7, pp.897-924, 2015.
DOI : 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786073

P. J. Dimaggio, Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums, 1920-1940 The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp.267-292, 1991.

P. J. Dimaggio and W. W. Powell, The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, American Sociological Review, vol.48, issue.2, pp.147-160, 1983.
DOI : 10.2307/2095101

R. Durand and J. Jourdan, Jules or Jim: Alternative Conformity to Minority Logics, Academy of Management Journal, vol.55, issue.6, pp.1295-1315, 2012.
DOI : 10.5465/amj.2011.0345

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00772070

K. M. Eisenhardt, Building Theories from Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review, vol.14, issue.4, pp.532-550, 1989.
DOI : 10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

K. M. Eisenhardt and M. E. Graebner, Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges, Academy of Management Journal, vol.50, issue.1, pp.25-32, 2007.
DOI : 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888

URL : http://journals.aomonline.org/amj/editorials/Eisenhart.Graebner.2007.pdf

P. C. Fiss and E. J. Zajac, The Diffusion of Ideas over Contested Terrain: The (Non)adoption of a Shareholder Value Orientation among German Firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.49, pp.501-534, 2004.

P. C. Fiss and E. J. Zajac, The Symbolic Management of Strategic Change: Sensegiving Via Framing and Decoupling, Academy of Management Journal, vol.49, issue.6, pp.1173-1193, 2006.
DOI : 10.5465/amj.2006.23478255

, Annual report, Forfás, 2010.

A. Gawer and N. Phillips, Institutional Work as Logics Shift: The Case of Intel???s Transformation to Platform Leader, Organization Studies, vol.20, issue.8, pp.1035-1071, 2013.
DOI : 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189

E. George, P. Chattopadhyay, S. B. Sitkin, and J. Barden, Cognitive Underpinnings of Institutional Persistence and Change: A Framing Perspective, Academy of Management Review, vol.31, issue.2, pp.347-365, 2006.
DOI : 10.5465/amr.2006.20208685

T. F. Gieryn, What buildings do, Theory and Society, vol.31, issue.1, pp.35-74, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1014404201290

N. Granqvist, S. Grodal, and J. L. Woolley, Hedging Your Bets: Explaining Executives' Market Labeling Strategies in Nanotechnology, Organization Science, vol.24, issue.2, pp.395-413, 2013.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.1120.0748

N. Granqvist and T. Ritvala, Beyond Prototypes: Drivers of Market Categorization in Functional Foods and Nanotechnology, Journal of Management Studies, vol.104, issue.2, pp.210-237, 2016.
DOI : 10.1086/210178

R. Greenwood, C. R. Hinings, and R. Suddaby, Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields, Academy of Management Journal, vol.45, pp.58-80, 2002.

T. Hallett, The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School, American Sociological Review, vol.3, issue.1, pp.52-74, 2010.
DOI : 10.1086/226634

T. Hallett and M. J. Ventresca, How Institutions Form, American Behavioral Scientist, vol.17, issue.2, pp.908-924, 2006.
DOI : 10.2307/2391875

J. Heese, R. Krishnan, and F. Moers, Selective Regulator Decoupling and Organizations??? Strategic Responses, Academy of Management Journal, vol.59, issue.6, 2016.
DOI : 10.5465/amj.2015.0446

T. Heinze, Nanoscience and nanotechnology in Europe: Analysis of publications and patent applications including comparisons with the United States, Nanotechnology Law & Business, vol.1, pp.427-445, 2004.

T. Hernes, Enabling and Constraining Properties of Organizational Boundaries, 2003.
DOI : 10.2307/2393372

, Managing boundaries in organizations: multiple perspectives, pp.35-54

T. Hernes, Studying Composite Boundaries: A Framework of Analysis, Human Relations, vol.57, issue.1, pp.9-29, 2004.
DOI : 10.2307/2391875

T. Hernes, The spatial construction of organization, 2004.
DOI : 10.1075/aios.12

C. Jones, E. Boxenbaum, and C. Anthony, The Immateriality of Material Practices in Institutional Logics, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, pp.51-75, 2013.
DOI : 10.2307/2392880

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00870440

D. Katz and R. L. Kahn, The Social Psychology of Organizations, 1966.

F. Kodeih and R. Greenwood, Responding to Institutional Complexity: The Role of Identity, Organization Studies, vol.25, issue.1, pp.7-39, 2014.
DOI : 10.2307/2667110

M. Kornberger and S. R. Clegg, Bringing Space Back in: Organizing the Generative Building, Organization Studies, vol.62, issue.4, pp.1095-1114, 2004.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110874143.325

M. S. Kraatz and E. S. Block, Organizational implications of institutional pluralism The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, pp.243-275, 2008.

I. Lakatos, Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes, 1970.

, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, pp.91-198

. Cambridge,

G. Laudel, The art of getting funded: how scientists adapt to their funding conditions, Science and Public Policy, vol.33, issue.7, pp.489-504, 2006.
DOI : 10.3152/147154306781778777

D. Lavie and I. Drori, Collaborating for Knowledge Creation and Application: The Case of Nanotechnology Research Programs, Organization Science, vol.23, issue.3, pp.704-724, 2012.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.1110.0656

H. Lefebvre, The production of space, 1991.

T. L. Maclean and M. Behnam, The Dangers of Decoupling: The Relationship Between Compliance Programs, Legitimacy Perceptions, and Institutionalized Misconduct, Academy of Management Journal, vol.53, issue.6, pp.1499-1520, 2010.
DOI : 10.5465/amj.2010.57319198

G. Martin, G. Currie, S. Weaver, R. Finn, and R. Mcdonald, Institutional Complexity and Individual Responses: Delineating the Boundaries of Partial Autonomy. Organization Studies, forthcoming, 2016.

J. W. Meyer and B. Rowan, Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony, American Journal of Sociology, vol.83, issue.2, pp.340-363, 1977.
DOI : 10.1086/226550

M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative data analysis, 1994.

C. Oliver, STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES, Academy of Management Review, vol.16, issue.1, pp.145-179, 1991.
DOI : 10.5465/amr.1991.4279002

W. J. Orlikowski, Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work. Organization Studies, pp.1435-1448, 2007.

W. J. Orlikowski and S. V. Scott, Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization, The Academy of Management Annals, pp.433-474, 2008.

N. Paulsen, ???Who Are We Now????: Group Identity, Boundaries, and the (Re)Organizing Process, Managing boundaries in organizations, pp.14-34, 2003.
DOI : 10.1177/014920630102700205

T. Pinch, Technology and institutions: living in a material world, Theory and Society, vol.19, issue.4, pp.461-483, 2008.
DOI : 10.1215/9780822384250

K. R. Popper, Normal Science and its Dangers, Criticism and the growth of knowledge, pp.51-58, 1970.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139171434.007

M. G. Pratt and P. O. Foreman, Classifying Managerial Responses to Multiple Organizational Identities, Academy of Management Review, vol.25, issue.1, pp.18-42, 2000.
DOI : 10.5465/amr.2000.2791601

M. G. Pratt, K. Rockmann, and J. Kaufmann, Constructing Professional Identity: The Role of Work and Identity Learning Cycles in the Customization of Identity Among Medical Residents, Academy of Management Journal, vol.49, issue.2, pp.235-262, 2006.
DOI : 10.5465/amj.2006.20786060

A. Raaijmakers, P. Vermeulen, M. Meeus, and C. Zietsma, I Need Time! Exploring Pathways to Compliance under Institutional Complexity, Academy of Management Journal, vol.58, issue.1, pp.85-110, 2015.
DOI : 10.5465/amj.2011.0276

URL : http://amj.aom.org/content/58/1/85.full.pdf

A. E. Randel, K. S. Jaussi, and S. S. Standifird, Organizational Responses to Negative Evaluation by External Stakeholders, Business & Society, vol.22, issue.4, pp.438-466, 2009.
DOI : 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540090

M. C. Roco, International Perspective on Government Nanotechnology Funding in 2005, Journal of Nanoparticle Research, vol.50, issue.5, pp.707-712, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s11051-005-3141-5

URL : http://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/nano/reports/mcr_05-0526_intpersp_nano.pdf

M. Ruef and R. W. Scott, A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.43, issue.4, pp.877-904, 1998.
DOI : 10.2307/2393619

R. W. Scott, Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests, 2008.

S. Sonenshein, The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model, Academy of Management Review, vol.32, issue.4, pp.1022-1040, 2007.
DOI : 10.5465/amr.2007.26585677

A. Tilcsik, From Ritual to Reality: Demography, Ideology, and Decoupling in a Post-Communist Government Agency, Academy of Management Journal, vol.53, issue.6, pp.1474-1498, 2010.
DOI : 10.5465/amj.2010.57318905

URL : http://www-2.rotman.utoronto.ca/facbios/file/amj.pdf

C. Turco, Difficult Decoupling: Employee Resistance to the Commercialization of Personal Settings, American Journal of Sociology, vol.118, issue.2, pp.380-419, 2012.
DOI : 10.1086/666505

A. Van-marrewijk and D. Yanow, The spatial turn in organizational studies, Organizational Spaces: rematerializing the workaday world, pp.1-16, 2010.

J. D. Westphal and E. J. Zajac, Decoupling Policy from Practice: The Case of Stock Repurchase Programs, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.46, issue.2, pp.202-228, 2001.
DOI : 10.2307/2667086

R. Whitley, Changing governance of the public sciences The changing governance of the sciences, pp.3-27, 2007.

T. Wry, M. Lounsbury, and M. A. Glynn, Legitimating Nascent Collective Identities: Coordinating Cultural Entrepreneurship, Organization Science, vol.22, issue.2, pp.449-463, 2011.
DOI : 10.1287/orsc.1100.0613

R. K. Yin, Case study research: Design and methods, 2009.