.. .. Structure,

. .. La-«-défragmentation-»-ou-la-restauration-de-la-connectivité-paysagère, 5 2.2.4. La restauration de la trame forestière en France

. Matériels and . .. Méthodes, Echantillonnage de la flore, du sol et du peuplement

. .. Résultats,

. Discussion and . .. Perspectives, Influence de la connectivité paysagère sur la composition floristique

. .. Conclusion,

. .. Bibliographie,

. , Annexe 1 : Thèmes reconnus sur les Cartes d'Etat-major

. , Liste des points de relevé et leurs coordonnées, vol.2

.. .. Fiche-de-relevé-pédologique, Annexe, vol.3

. , Fiche de relevé dendrométrique, Annexe, vol.4

. , Liste des espèces de la strate herbacée figurant dans l'AFC, vol.5

K. Aune, B. G. Jonsson, and J. Moen, Isolation and edge effects among woodland key habitats in Sweden: is forest policy promoting fragmentation, Biological Conservation, vol.124, pp.89-95, 2005.

L. Baeten, M. Hermy, and K. Verheyen, Environmental limitation contributes to the differential colonization capacity of two forest herbs, Journal of Vegetation Science, vol.20, pp.209-223, 2009.

J. Baudry and G. Merriam, Connectivity and connectedness: functional versus structural patterns in landscapes, Münstersche Geographische Arbeiten, vol.29, pp.23-28, 1988.

R. Bivand, The Spdep Package. Comprehensive R Archive Network, Version 0, pp.5-27, 2011.

B. Bossuyt, M. Hermy, and J. Deckers, Migration of herbaceous plant species across ancient and recent forest ecotones in central Belgium, Journal of Ecology, vol.87, pp.629-638, 1999.

B. Bossuyt and M. Hermy, Restoration of the understorey layer of recent forest bordering ancient forest, Applied Vegetation Science, vol.3, pp.43-50, 2000.

F. Burel and J. Baudry, Ecologie du paysage : Concepts, méthodes et applications. Broché, 1999.

S. Chauchard, Dynamique d'une forêt méditerranéenne dans un monde changeant, 2007.

B. Cinotti, Évolution des surfaces boisées en France : proposition de reconstitution depuis le début du XIXe siècle, vol.48, pp.547-562, 1996.

P. De-frenne, L. Baeten, B. J. Graae, J. Brunet, M. Wulf et al., Interregional variation in the floristic recovery of post-agricultural forests, Journal of Ecology, vol.99, pp.600-609, 2011.

J. L. Dupouey, D. Sciama, W. Koerner, E. Dambrine, and J. Rameau, La végétation des forêts anciennes, vol.54, pp.521-532, 2002.

Z. Dwzonko, Relations between the floristic composition of isolated young woods and their proximity to ancient woodland, Journal of Vegetation Science, vol.4, pp.693-698, 1993.

P. Eberle, Pistes de réflexion autour d'une étude des effets de la défragmentation sur la diversité forestière, vol.25, 2011.

H. Ellenberg, H. E. Weber, R. Dall, V. Wirth, W. Werner et al., Indicator values of plants in Central Europe, Scripta Geobotanica, vol.18, pp.1-258, 1991.

. Esri, ArcGIS 10 of ArcMap, ArcCatalog, ArcToolbox and Spatial Analyst User's Guide. Redlands, Esri ©, 1995.

L. Fahrig, Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, vol.34, pp.487-515, 2003.

C. S. Findlay and J. Houlahan, Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands, Conservation Biology, vol.1, pp.1000-1009, 1997.

K. M. Flinn and M. Vellend, Recovery of forest plant communities in post-agricultural landscapes, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, vol.3, pp.243-250, 2005.

R. T. Forman, Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions, vol.656, p.pp, 1995.

A. B. Franklin, B. R. Noon, and T. L. George, What is habitat fragmentation? In Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds in western landscapes: contrasts with paradigms from the eastern United States, Studies in Avian Biology, vol.25, pp.20-29, 2002.

J. P. Gibbs, Distribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient, Landscape Ecology, vol.13, pp.263-268, 1998.

F. Gillet, La phytosociologie synusiale intégrée, Guide méthodologique, Document 1, p.24, 1999.

F. S. Gilliam, The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems, BioScience, vol.57, pp.845-858, 2007.

B. J. Goodwin and L. Fahrig, How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity, Oikos 99, pp.552-570, 2002.

M. Gosselin and O. Laroussinie, Biodiversité et gestion forestière, Connaître pour préserver, Synthèse bibliographique, Cemagref éditions, ECOFOR, Études, gestion des territoires, vol.20, pp.101-126, 2004.

B. J. Graae, P. B. Sunde, and B. Fritzbùger, Vegetation and soil differences in ancient opposed to new forests, Forest Ecology and Management, vol.177, pp.179-190, 2003.

J. P. Grime, Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory, American Naturalist, vol.111, pp.1169-1194, 1977.

W. H. Hatheway, G. P. Patil, E. C. Pielou, and W. E. Waters, Contingency table analysis of rain forest vegetation, Statistical Ecology. III Multi-Species Population Ecosystems and Systems Analysis, pp.271-314, 1971.

M. Hermy, Effects of former land use on plant species diversity and pattern in european Deciduous woodland. Biodiversity, Temperate Ecosystems, and Global Change, pp.123-144, 1994.

M. Hermy, O. Honnay, L. Firbank, C. Grashof-bokdam, and J. E. Lawesson, An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species in Europe, and the implications for forest conservation, Biology Conservation, vol.91, pp.9-22, 1999.

M. Hermy and K. Verheyen, Legacies of the past in the present-day forest biodiversity: a review of past land-use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity, Ecological Research, vol.22, pp.361-371, 2007.

, Département de la Meuse, Troisième inventaire forestier du département, Commentaires sur les résultats. IFN, vol.130, 1998.

, Troisième inventaire forestier du département, Résultats et commentaires. IFN, vol.116, 2001.

, Les sylvoécorégions (SER) de France métropolitaine, Etude de définition. IFN, IFN, vol.166, 2009.

R. Ihaka and R. Gentleman, R: a language for data analysis and graphics, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, vol.5, pp.299-314, 1996.

. Ifn, La forêt française, Les résultats issus des campagnes d'inventaire, Les résultats pour la région Lorraine, vol.29, 2005.

H. Jacquemyn, J. Butaye, and M. Hermy, Forest plant species richness in small, fragmented mixed deciduous forest patches: the role of area, time and dispersal limitation, Journal of Biogeography, vol.28, pp.801-812, 2001.

T. Kadoya, Assessing functional connectivity using empirical data, Population Ecology, vol.51, pp.5-15, 2009.

P. Kindlmann and F. Burel, Connectivity measures: a review, Landscape ecology, vol.23, pp.979-990, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00335997

D. Kneeshaw, Effet de la fragmentation des forêts sur le maintien de la biodiversité au Québec. Québec, Ministère des Ressources naturelles du Québec, vol.88, 1995.

W. Koerner, B. Cinotti, J. H. Jussy, and M. Benoît, Évolution des surfaces boisées en France depuis le début du XIX ème siècle : identification et localisation des boisements des territoires agricoles abandonnés, vol.52, pp.249-269, 2000.

M. Lindner, M. Maroschek, S. Netherer, A. Kremer, A. Barbati et al., Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems, Forest Ecology Management, vol.259, pp.698-709, 2010.

J. M. Lord and D. A. Norton, Scale and the spatial concept of fragmentation, Conservation Biology, vol.4, pp.197-202, 1990.

R. H. Macarthur and E. O. Wilson, The Theory of Island Biogeography, 1967.

G. R. Matlack, Plant species migration in a mixed history forest landscape in eastern North American, Ecology, vol.75, pp.1491-1502, 1994.

J. Oksanen, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, B. O'hara, G. L. Simpson et al., Community ecology package-the vegan packageOrdination methods and other usual functions for community and vegetation ecologist, vol.2, 2006.

G. F. Peterken, . Chapman, . Hall, . London, and O. Rackham, Ancient woodland. Its history, vegetation and uses in, 1980.

D. Sciama, L. Augusto, J. L. Dupouey, M. Gonzalez, and C. M. Dominguez, Floristic and ecological differences between recent and ancient forests growing on non-acidic soils, Forest Ecology and Management, vol.258, pp.600-608, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.04.027

T. Schmidt, P. Arens, M. J. Smulders, R. Billeter, J. Liira et al., Effects of landscape structure on genetic diversity of Geum urbanum L. populations in agricultural landscapes, Functional Ecology of Plants, vol.204, pp.549-559, 2009.

I. F. Spellerberg, Ecological Effects of Roads, Land Reconstruction and Management, vol.2, 2002.

P. D. Taylor, L. Fahrig, K. Henin, and G. Merriam, Connectivity is vital element of landscape structure, Oikos, vol.68, pp.571-573, 1993.
DOI : 10.2307/3544927

P. D. Taylor, L. Fahrig, and K. A. With, Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics, Connectivity conservation, pp.29-43, 2006.
DOI : 10.1017/cbo9780511754821.003

M. Vellend, K. Verheyen, K. M. Flinn, H. Jacquemyn, A. Kolb et al., Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species environment relationships via agricultural land use, Journal of Ecology, vol.95, pp.565-573, 2007.

K. Verheyen, B. Bossuyt, M. Hermy, and G. Tack, The land use history (1278-1990) of a mixed hardwood forest in western Belgium and its relationship with chemical soil characteristics, Journal of Biogeography, vol.26, pp.1115-1128, 1999.

K. Verheyen, I. Fastenaekels, M. Vellend, L. De-keersmaeker, and M. Hermy, Landscape factors and regional differences in recovery rates of herb layer richness in Flanders (Belgium), Landscape Ecology, vol.21, pp.1109-1118, 2006.

A. Young, T. Boyle, and T. Brown, The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol.11, pp.413-418, 1996.

P. A. Zuidema, J. A. Sayer, and W. Dijkman, Forest fragmentation and biodiversity: the case for intermediate-sized conservation areas, Environmental Conservation, vol.23, pp.290-297, 1996.
DOI : 10.1017/s037689290003914x

, Humus : Observation de la prospection à la tarière Couche Epaisseur (cm) Recouvrement Oln Olt Olv Prof. fosse : Cause arrêt : Texture à 5 cm : OF Prof. Tarière : Cause arrêt : % élément grossier sur 50 cm : OH Prof. Plancher : Nature du plancher : Prof. Réaction HCl terre fine : Nom de l'humus : Prof, Fiche de relevé pédologique Identifiant site : Type patch : Prélèvement échantillon de sol (0 :-5 cm, vol.3

. Prof, Hydromorphie 2 (> 40 % taches

. Prof, Hydromorphie 3 (< 20 % de matrice

, Annexe 4 : Fiche de relevé dendrométrique Identifiant site : Espèce (deux premières lettres Genre + deux premières lettres Espèce)

. Type-de-patch, Statut : DO (dominant), codo (codominant)