A. Avec and . Au-texte,

L. , M. H. , and H. ,

, L'accouchement sur utérus cicatriciel. Edition Masson 4 ème édition

. Lehmann-m, G. Hedelin, and . Sorgue-c, Facteurs prédictifs de la voie d'accouchement des femmes ayant un utérus cicatriciel, J Gynecol Obstet Biod Reprod, vol.28, pp.358-368, 1999.

A. , A. A. , and K. , Accouchement des utérus cicatriciels: peut-on élargir l'épreuve utérine?, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.27, pp.425-429, 1998.

C. and C. B. Lucidarme-p, Dystocie dynamique. Encyclopédie médico-chirurgicale, pp.5-064, 1997.

C. B. , Indications de césarienne en cas de dystocie, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.29, pp.68-73, 2000.

C. , Dystocie dynamique et mécanique

;. Périnatalité and G. P. Bagou-g, Grossesse et utérus cicatriciel, Recommandations pour la pratique clinique. Césarienne : conséquences et indications, pp.181-186, 1992.

D. and B. F. Piechon-l, La césarienne a-t-elle une indication en cas d'utérus cicatriciel ?, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.29, pp.51-67, 2000.

C. and G. F. , Abrégés de Périnatalité. Protocoles cliniques en Obstétrique. 2 ème édition. Edition Masson, pp.169-171

L. Berger-c and M. G. Obstétrique, Edition masson. 4 ème édition

A. and A. H. El-karroumi-m, Accouchement du gros bébé sur utérus cicatriciel : la place de l'épreuve utérine. À propos de 355 dossiers, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.29, pp.409-413, 2000.

B. , M. Sh, and . Bujold-c, Interdelivery interval and uterine rupture, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.187, pp.1199-202, 2002.

M. and J. Mackinnon-c, Directive clinique sur l'accouchement vaginal chez les patientes ayant déjà subi une césarienne, JOGC, vol.155, 2005.

S. Botosneano-a and H. ,

V. and R. H. , Successful first vaginal birth after Cesarean section: a predictor of reduced risk for uterine rupture in subsequent deliveries, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.2, pp.35-45, 2000.

S. Td, Z. C. , and R. Jt, The association of maternal age and symptomatic uterine rupture during a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery, Obstet Gynecol, vol.99, pp.585-593, 2002.

G. Pt, A. Jt, and C. Jb, Obesity as a risk factor for failed trial of labor in patients with previous cesarean delivery, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.192, issue.5, 2005.

B. , G. , and M. , Vaginal birth after cesarean section for arrest of labor: is success determined by maximum cervical dilatation during the prior labor?, Quelles sont les indications de la radiopelvimétrie ? Réalités en Gynécologie-Obstétrique. N°116. Décembre, vol.20, pp.173-179, 1988.

H. Ia and G. Jl, Correlation between maximum cervical dilatation at cesarean delivery and subsequent vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, Obstet Gynecol, issue.4, pp.591-593, 1997.

, Déclenchement artificiel du travail à partir de 37 semaines d'aménorrhée

P. Marret and H. Fignon-a, Utérus cicatriciel : la révision systématique de la cicatrice de césarienne après accouchement par voie vaginale estelle toujours utile ?, HAS. Service des bonnes pratiques professionnelles et Service évaluation économique et santé publique. Avril, vol.28, pp.253-262, 1999.

C. Demirdjian, Accouchement par voie basse sur utérus cicatriciel. Les Dossiers de l'Obstétrique. Février, p.192, 1992.

M. Line-paillette.-l'utérus-cicatriciel-;-cabrol-d, P. , G. , L. J. , and M. , La femme enceinte : anomalie de la phase active, Les dossiers de l'obstétrique. N°251. Juin, vol.27, pp.304-308, 1997.

. Peaceman-a, The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystocia, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol.195, pp.1127-1158, 2006.

S. and S. Stamilioerika-d, Les dystocies dynamiques en 1996 et leurs corrections. JTA 1996 [33] TARIK KHARRASSE. Accouchement sur utérus cicatriciel. Université Hassan II. Faculté de médecine et de pharmacie de Casablanca. Année 2006 [34] FLORIANE BOUDIN. Facteurs de risque de rupture utérine sur utérus cicatriciel. Mémoire de sage-femme promotion, Predicting Failure of a Vaginal Birth Attempt After Cesarean Delivery, vol.109, pp.1003-1008, 1993.

T. S. , La césarienne a-t-elle une indication en cas de présentation du siège ?, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.29, pp.30-39, 2000.

A. and A. H. El-karroumi-m, Accouchement gémellaire sur utérus cicatriciel : peut-on autoriser l'épreuve utérine ?, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.28, pp.820-824, 1999.

A. and N. A. Ishikawa-g, Prediction of uterine dehiscence by measuring lower uterine segment thickness prior to the onset of labor: evaluation by transvaginal ultrasonography, J Nippon Med Sch, vol.67, issue.5, pp.352-358, 2000.

R. , G. F. , and P. Hj, Echographic measurement of the inferior uterine segment for assessing the risk of uterine rupture, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.26, issue.5, pp.513-522, 1997.

K. Fairlie-f and C. Ad, The role of postnatal x-ray pelvimetry after caesarean section in the management of subsequent delivery, Br J Obstet Gynecol, vol.98, pp.716-724, 1991.

C. Ab, S. Td, and R. Jt, Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.181, pp.872-878, 1999.

M. Da, D. Fg, and P. Rh, Vaginal birth after cesarean : a 10 year experience, Obstet Gynecol, vol.84, pp.255-263, 1994.

M. Da, . Mullin-p, and . Hou-d, Vaginal birth after cesarean section in twin gestation, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.175, pp.194-202, 1996.

O. and T. L. Wolfson-m, Evidence that women with a history of cesarean section can deliver twins safely, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol.76, pp.663-669, 1997.

Z. Cm, T. A. Shipp, and . Cohen-a, Trial of labor after 40 weeks' gestation in women with prior cesarean, Obstet Gynecol, vol.97, pp.391-394, 2001.

E. Ma, M. Ca, and M. Mp, Association of interpregnancy interval with uterine scar failure in labor: a case-control study, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.183, pp.1180-1183, 2000.

S. Ta, Z. Cm, and R. Jt, Interdelivery interval and risk of symptomatic uterine rupture, Obstet Gynecol, vol.97, pp.175-182, 2001.

H. Wh, N. Dk, and R. Pj, Le déclenchement du travail est-il justifié en cas d'utérus cicatriciel, de siège, de grossesses multiples, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.99, pp.57-61, 1995.

N. Tf and L. U. Hagberg-h, Rupture and dehiscence of cesarean section scar during pregnancy and delivery, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.160, pp.569-73, 1989.

L. and H. Z. Goldschmidt-r, Routine previous cesarean scar exploration following successful vaginal delivery. Is it necessary?, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.45, pp.185-191, 1992.

R. M. Kaplan-b and P. , Routine revision of uterine scar after prior cesarean section, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol.73, pp.473-478, 1994.

S. , W. A. Katz-m, F. M. , and M. ,

, Routine revision of uterine scar after cesarean section: has it ever been necessary?, Eur J Obset Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.78, pp.29-32, 1998.

P. Marret and H. Fignon-a, Scarred uterus: is routine exploration of the cesarean scar after vaginal birth always necessary?, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, vol.28, pp.253-62, 1999.

C. Tl and R. H. Graves-w, Vaginal birth after Cesarean among women with gestational diabetes, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.184, pp.1104-1111, 2001.

B. Sc, H. Ss, and W. Hm, Rupture and dehiscence of cesarean section scar during pregnancy and delivery, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.45, pp.569-73, 1989.

R. Mg, J. C. Dickinson, and W. Cl, Vaginal birth after cesarean : a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality, Obstet Gynecol, vol.77, pp.465-470, 1991.

Z. Cm, R. Shipp-td, and . Jt, Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.181, pp.882-888, 1999.

R. Dj, W. Sl, and P. Jk, Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.183, pp.1176-1185, 2000.

B. and H. M. Segal-d, Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-Cesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus foley catheter, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, vol.12, pp.42-47, 2002.

B. , B. Sc, and G. Rj, Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture, Obstet Gynecol, vol.103, pp.18-23, 2004.

L. , H. Vl, and E. Tr, Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery, N Engl J Med, vol.345, pp.3-8, 2001.

F. Bl, A. D. , and G. Jr, Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a multicenter study of patients with prior cesarean delivery, Am J Perinatol, vol.14, pp.157-60, 1997.

M. Mj, L. Er, and B. Wa, Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study, Obstet Gynecol, vol.335, pp.927-959, 1994.

B. Gauthier-rj-;-flamm, G. Bl, and . Am, Neonatal morbidity associated with uterine rupture: what are the risk factors?, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.186, p.907, 1997.

, Statistiques Annuelles des Etablissements de santé (SAE), 2007.

L. Ra, Risk of selected postpartum infections after cesarean section compared with vaginal birth: A five-year cohort study of 32,468 women, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol.29, pp.1-8, 2009.

M. C. Nally, O. M. , and T. Mj, Induction of labour after 1 previous caesarean section, Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.39, pp.425-434, 1999.

H. Bujold-e, Effect of Prior Vaginal Delivery or Prior Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery on Obstetric Outcomes in Women Undergoing Trial of Labor, Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.104, 2004.

, Journées d'études et de formation. 35 ème assises nationales des sages-femmes. 18 ème session européenne, SITES INTERNET: Association Césarine. Préparer un AVAC. Disponible sur, vol.23