, Le fonctionnement des caméras endobuccales

, Technol Dent, vol.295, pp.45-50, 2011.

L. ,

L. 'empreinte-optique, Silence on tourne! Strat Prothétique, vol.14, issue.2, pp.115-143, 2014.

D. Pelissier-b, Differentes méthodes d'empreinte en CFAO dentaire

E. Buccale, , pp.1-16, 2010.

L. O. ,

, L'Empreinte optique Intra-­-Buccale et ses applications au cabinet dentaire. Sarrebruck : Editions Universitaires Européennes, 2011.

M. Herrera-s and D. , Marginal fit of cast gold MO inlays from disinfected elastomeric impressions

, J Prosthet Dent, vol.58, issue.3, pp.276-80, 1987.

M. A. Dental and C. Cam,

, Computer Graphics World, pp.109-121, 1990.

D. Allard, Y. , and A. J. , Caméras de prise d'empreinte, l'heure du choix?, Inf Dent, vol.93, pp.45-59, 2011.

R. T. ,

L. 'empreinte-optique, une réalité au service de l'équipe de soins, vol.32, pp.431-440, 2011.

Z. S. ,

S. Les-modèles,

, Strat Prothétique, vol.10, issue.5, pp.363-371, 2010.

J. V. 3m-­-lava and -. ,

, Fil Dent, vol.63, pp.38-42, 2011.

S. Reich-g, R. D. , C. Klein, C. , and B. , Clinical evaluation of all-­-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling

, J Dent, vol.38, issue.7, pp.553-562, 2010.

S. W. Cerec and . Implantology,

, CEREC Ztg, vol.13, p.1, 2008.

R. , N. J. , D. T. Rothamel-d, C. J. , and K. Ve,

, 3D X-­-ray meets CAD/CAM dentistry: a novel procedure for virtual dental implant planning

, Int J Comput Dent, vol.12, issue.1, pp.29-40, 2009.

K. M. Wichmann-m and K. Heckmann-s, Strain development in 3-­-unit implant-­-supported CAD/CAM restorations

, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, vol.23, issue.4, pp.648-52, 2008.

A. P. , Le trios de 3Shape aide à faire entrer le monde dentaire dans l

, Orthod Bioprogressive, vol.22, issue.2, pp.35-43, 2014.

. France, Solutions 3M pour le Soin Oral Professionnel : l'expertise du soin oral version numérique

G. and G. R. , Orthodontie linguale une technique d'avenir

, Inf Dent, vol.86, issue.32, pp.2043-51, 2004.

B. and M. Wh, Clinical Evaluation of Adhesively Placed Cerec Endo-­-Crowns after 2 Years-­Preliminary Results

, J Adhes Dent, vol.1, issue.3, pp.255-65, 1999.

S. Lh, S. K. Schlichting-kk, M. M. , and M. , An approach to biomimetics: the natural CAD/CAM restoration: a clinical report

, J Prosthet Dent, vol.111, issue.2, pp.107-122, 2014.

C. , R. J. , and F. M. Bennasar-b,

, Strat Prothétique, vol.14, issue.1, pp.17-24, 2014.

Z. Sorrentino-r, A. D. Valentino-b, . Ferrari-m, and . Aversa-r, Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: A 3D static linear finite elements analysis

, Dent Mater, vol.22, issue.11, pp.1035-1079, 2006.

B. Richter-b and M. Wh, Survival of Ceramic Computer-­-aided Design/Manufacturing Crowns Bonded to Preparations with Reduced Macroretention Geometry

, Int J Prosthodont, vol.18, issue.3, pp.219-243, 2005.

W. Rj, E. D. Bibb-r, and . Collis-j, Use of CAD/CAM technology to fabricate a removable partial denture framework

, J Prosthet Dent, vol.96, issue.2, pp.96-105, 2006.

J. , J. M. , D. J. , and N. ,

, Strat Prothétique, vol.11, issue.1, pp.37-46, 2011.

J. , J. M. , and N. ,

, Strat Prothétique, vol.11, issue.2, pp.97-106, 2011.

S. C. ,

C. La,

, Technol Dent, issue.326, pp.10-21, 2014.

G. , K. C. , S. M. , B. F. , and E. , Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing

, Clin Oral Investig, vol.17, issue.4, pp.1201-1209, 2013.

S. Decker-m, W. F. , K. H. , and G. , Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro

, J Dent, vol.42, issue.6, pp.677-83, 2014.

B. Pk, W. S. , E. L. , and K. A. Reich-s, The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow-­-­the comparison of two systems

, Clin Oral Investig, vol.17, issue.9, pp.2119-2144, 2013.

E. A. , Conventional versus digital impressions-­-an in-­-vitro study

, Int J Comput Dent, vol.14, issue.1, pp.11-21, 2011.

C. Gj, Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions?, J Am Dent Assoc, vol.139, issue.6, pp.761-764, 2008.

P. Sbm, L. C. , S. S. , and A. , The time efficiency of intraoral scanners

, J Am Dent Assoc, vol.145, issue.6, pp.542-51, 2014.

G. , G. , A. A. , and L. S. ,

, Cah Prothèse, issue.141, pp.65-72, 2008.

M. Ea and C. White-s, The evolution of digital dentistry and the digital dental team

, Dent Today, vol.27, issue.9, pp.116-123, 2008.

N. , D. N. , and K. T. Wakabayashi-k, Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-­-ceramic crowns

, Int J Prosthodont, vol.16, issue.3, pp.244-252, 2003.

D. , D. A. Van-der-zel-j, and . Van-waas-m, Marginal fit and short-­-term clinical performance of porcelain-­-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays

, J Prosthet Dent, vol.84, issue.5, pp.506-519, 2000.

M. Van-der, A. Wj, W. D. Fs, and . Ren-y, Application of Intra-­-Oral Dental Scanners in the Digital Workflow of Implantology

, PLoS ONE, vol.7, issue.8, p.43312, 2012.

S. Brueckel and C. Wöstmann-b, Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow

, Clin Oral Investig, vol.17, issue.7, pp.1759-64, 2013.

P. , E. A. Stampf-s, S. J. , and A. , Accuracy of full-­-arch scans using intraoral scanners

, Clin Oral Investig, vol.18, issue.6, pp.1687-94, 2014.

N. Rg and P. Ask, Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: An in vitro comparison based on 3-­-dimensional analysis

, J Prosthet Dent, vol.112, issue.6, pp.1461-71, 2014.

E. A. , In-­-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-­-arch dental impressions

, Quintessence Int, vol.46, issue.1, pp.9-17, 2015.

B. , B. E. , and R. P. Wöstmann-b, Accuracy of single-­-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients

, Clin Oral Investig, vol.19, issue.8, pp.2027-2061, 2015.

T. Lebon-n and A. , La chaine numérique en CFAO dentaire en prothèse conjointe : structuration de la chaine de production

. , 1.3 Enregistrement du pilier et réalisation d'une couronne, Réal Clin, vol.26, issue.4, 2015.

. ). ,

. .. Orthodontie,

.. .. Caméra-itéro®,

:. .. , Caméra Trios de 3SHAPE(15)

. , 3M TRUE définition Scanner (16,17)

.. .. Prothèse-fixée,

!. Erreur, . Signet-non, and . Défini,

). .. , Prothèse amovible, pp.23-26

.. .. Avantages-des-systèmes-d'empreinte-optique,

. , 29)(30)

. , Enregistrement des limites périphériques : (31)

. .. Gain-de-temps,

. .. Empreinte-optique-inaltérable,

. .. Transmission-au-prothésiste,

. , Confort du patient et intérêt dans la communication

. , Ouverture des formats de prise d'empreinte

. .. Longévité,

C. Du and :. .. ,

. , 83 6.2 Etude in vitro de Vat der Meer d'aout 2012, Comparaison des différentes caméras optiques

?. .. Discussion-;-l'empreinte-optique-a-­-t-­-elle-sa-place-dans-un-cabinet-dentaire-d'omni-­pratique,

.. .. Les,

. .. Les-différentes-présentations,

.. .. Poudrage,

.. .. Taille-de-la-caméra-et-de-l'embout,

.. .. La-précision,

.. .. Inlay-­-core,

. Implantologie and . .. Orthodontie,

. .. Format-d'enregistrement,

.. .. Les,

.. .. Tableau,

. .. Bibliographie,

, Table des matières ???????????????????????????????????122

D. Bruno and -. , Comparaison des systèmes d'empreintes optiques accessibles aux chirurgiens dentistes dans leurs cabinets en, 2015.

N. , 124 pages-76 figures-15 tableaux, 2016.