F. Vendittelli, J. C. Pons, D. Lemery, and N. Mamelle, The term breech presentation: Neonatal results and obstetric practices in France, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.125, pp.176-84, 2006.

M. Cheng and M. Hannah, Breech delivery at term: a critical review of the literature, Obstet Gynecol, vol.82, pp.605-623, 1993.

L. Brown, T. Karrison, and L. A. Cibils, Mode of delivery and perinatal results in breech presentation, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.171, pp.28-34, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70073-7

F. Vendittelli, O. Rivière, C. Crenn-hébert, M. Rozan, B. Maria et al., Is a breech presentation at term more frequent in women with a history of cesarean delivery?, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.198, pp.521-522, 2008.

J. Schaal and D. Riethmuller, La Présentation du Siège. MAPAR. Communications scientifiques, 2003.

J. Schaal, D. Riethmuller, C. Rabenja, and P. Barbarino-monnier, Présentations du siège. Mécaniques Tech. Obstétricales. 4ème, pp.369-90, 2012.

K. Brady, P. Duff, J. A. Read, and F. E. Harlass, Reliability of fetal buttock blood sampling in assessing the acid-base balance of the breech fetus, Obstet Gynecol, vol.74, pp.886-894, 1989.

M. E. Hannah, W. J. Hannah, S. A. Hewson, E. D. Hodnett, S. Saigal et al., Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial, The Lancet, vol.356, pp.1375-83, 2000.
DOI : 10.1097/00006254-200103000-00007

D. 'ercole, C. Barde, K. Haumonté, J. B. Shojai, R. Carcopino et al., le retour ? Communication orale du Vendredi 9 décembre 2011-35e Journées Nationales du CNGOF n.d, 2017.

H. Whyte, M. E. Hannah, S. Saigal, W. J. Hannah, S. Hewson et al., Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: The international randomized Term Breech Trial, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.191, pp.864-71, 2004.

?. Pratique-medicale-n, , 2016.

C. Rietberg, P. M. Elferink-stinkens, and G. Visser, The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.112, pp.205-214, 2005.

F. Vlemmix, L. Bergenhenegouwen, J. M. Schaaf, S. Ensing, A. N. Rosman et al., Term breech deliveries in the Netherlands: did the increased cesarean rate affect neonatal outcome? A population-based cohort study, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol.93, pp.888-96, 2014.

K. Devarajan, G. Seaward, P. Farine, and D. , Attitudes Among Toronto Obstetricians Towards Vaginal Breech Delivery, J Obstet Gynaecol Can, vol.33, issue.16, pp.34875-34882, 2011.

E. A. Sullivan, K. Moran, and M. Chapman, Term breech singletons and caesarean section: A population study, Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.49, pp.456-60, 1991.

M. Carayol, B. Blondel, J. Zeitlin, G. Breart, and F. Goffinet, Changes in the rates of caesarean delivery before labour for breech presentation at term in France: 1972-2003, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.132, pp.20-26, 2007.

E. Lagrange, A. Der-halden, M. Ughetto, S. Boda, C. Accoceberry et al., Accouchement du siège par voie vaginale : évolution de l'acceptabilité par les obstétriciens et les patientes, Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertil, vol.35, pp.757-63, 2007.

F. Goffinet, M. Carayol, J. Foidart, A. S. Uzan, S. Subtil et al., Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.194, pp.1002-1013, 2006.

S. Adjaoud, R. Demailly, S. Michel-semail, T. Rakza, L. Storme et al., Is trial of labor harmful in breech delivery? A cohort comparison for breech and vertex presentations, J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, vol.46, pp.445-453, 2017.

E. Gannard-pechin, R. Ramanah, M. Desmarets, R. Maillet, and D. Riethmuller,

, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.42, pp.685-92, 2013.

L. J. Burrows, L. A. Meyn, and A. M. Weber, Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery, Obstet Gynecol, vol.103, pp.907-919, 2004.

C. Deneux-tharaux, E. Carmona, M. Bouvier-colle, and G. Bréart, Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery, Obstet Gynecol, vol.108, pp.541-549, 2006.

N. E. Marshall, R. Fu, and J. Guise, Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.205, 2011.

S. Liu, R. M. Liston, K. S. Joseph, M. Heaman, R. Sauve et al., Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term, CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can, vol.176, pp.455-60, 2007.

M. Carayol, S. Alexander, F. Goffinet, G. Bréart, A. S. Uzan et al.,

, J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod, vol.33, pp.37-44, 2004.

. Indications_cesarienne_programmee-recommandations and . Has, , 2012.

, Mode of term single breech delivery, Obstet Gynecol, vol.98, pp.1189-90, 2001.

, Mode of term singleton breech delivery, ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion, vol.108, issue.340, pp.235-242, 2006.

A. Kotaska, S. Menticoglou, R. Gagnon, D. Farine, M. Basso et al., SOGC clinical practice guideline: Vaginal delivery of breech presentation, Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet, vol.107, issue.226, pp.169-76, 2009.

, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Mothers and Babies Report, 2012.

, Aust Inst Health Welf n, 2017.

, Management of Breech Presentation at Term. Melbourne: RANZCOG. Management-of-breechpresentation-at-term-(C-Obs-11)-Review, Women%27s%20Health/Statement%20and%20guidelines/ClinicalObstetrics/Management-of-breech-presentation-at-term-(C-Obs-11)-Review, 2016.

G. Macharey, M. Väisänen-tommiska, M. Gissler, V. Ulander, L. Rahkonen et al., Neurodevelopmental outcome at the age of 4 years according to the planned mode of delivery in term breech presentation: a nationwide, population-based record linkage study, J Perinat Med, 2017.

K. Barlöv and G. Larsson, Results of a five-year prospective study using a feto-pelvic scoring system for term singleton breech delivery after uncomplicated pregnancy, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, vol.65, pp.315-324, 1986.

J. Hoffmann, K. Thomassen, P. Stumpp, M. Grothoff, C. Engel et al., New MRI Criteria for Successful Vaginal Breech Delivery in Primiparae, PloS One, vol.11, 2016.

A. J. Van-loon, A. Mantingh, E. K. Serlier, G. Kroon, E. L. Mooyaart et al., Randomised controlled trial of magnetic-resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation at term, Lancet Lond Engl, vol.350, pp.1799-804, 1997.

M. Franz, A. Bismarck, M. Delius, B. Ertl-wagner, C. Deppe et al., MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term, Arch Gynecol Obstet, vol.295, pp.351-360, 2017.

A. Bisits, The value of imaging pelvimetry in the management of the breech presentation at term, Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.55, pp.99-100, 2015.

M. Griffiths, Magnetic-resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation, Lancet Lond Engl, vol.351, p.912, 1998.

I. Monier, B. Blondel, A. Ego, M. Kaminiski, F. Goffinet et al., Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.122, pp.518-545, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02008032

A. P. Souka, I. Papastefanou, A. Pilalis, V. Michalitsi, P. Panagopoulos et al., Performance of the ultrasound examination in the early and late third trimester for the prediction of birth weight deviations, Prenat Diagn, vol.33, pp.915-935, 2013.

G. Kayem, G. Grangé, G. Bréart, and F. Goffinet, Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, vol.34, pp.566-71, 2009.

J. Lanowski, G. Lanowski, C. Schippert, K. Drinkut, P. Hillemanns et al., Ultrasound versus Clinical Examination to Estimate Fetal Weight at Term, Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, vol.77, pp.276-83, 2017.

J. Zhang, W. A. Bowes, and J. A. Fortney, Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review, Obstet Gynecol, vol.82, pp.306-318, 1993.

G. J. Hofmeyr, Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, p.184, 2004.

, Deciding whether to offer caesarean sectionNICE, 2011.

S. Collins, P. Ellaway, D. Harrington, M. Pandit, and L. Impey, The complications of external cephalic version: results from 805 consecutive attempts, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.114, pp.636-644, 2007.

F. Perrotin, S. Sauget, M. Laffont, J. Lansac, and G. Body, Version par manoeuvres externes : nouveaux apports techniques n

C. Cluver, N. Novikova, C. M. Koopmans, and H. M. West, Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol.1, p.9273, 2017.

T. G. Teoh, Effect of learning curve on the outcome of external cephalic version, Singapore Med J, vol.38, pp.323-328, 1997.

N. Mottet and D. Riethmuller,

, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.45, pp.1434-1479, 2016.

L. Bergenhenegouwen, F. Vlemmix, S. Ensing, J. Schaaf, J. Van-der-post et al., Preterm Breech Presentation: A Comparison of Intended Vaginal and Intended Cesarean Delivery, Obstet Gynecol, vol.126, 2015.

G. Kayem, V. Combaud, E. Lorthe, B. Haddad, P. Descamps et al., Mortality and morbidity in early preterm breech singletons: impact of a policy of planned vaginal delivery, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.192, pp.61-66, 2015.

A. Herbst and K. Källén, Influence of mode of delivery on neonatal mortality and morbidity in spontaneous preterm breech delivery, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.133, pp.25-34, 2007.

E. Azria, G. Kayem, B. Langer, L. Marchand-martin, S. Marret et al., Neonatal Mortality and Long-Term Outcome of Infants Born between 27 and 32 Weeks of Gestational Age in Breech Presentation: The EPIPAGE Cohort Study, PloS One, vol.11, 2016.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01270729

B. Bodmer, A. Benjamin, F. H. Mclean, and R. H. Usher, Has use of cesarean section reduced the risks of delivery in the preterm breech presentation?, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.154, pp.244-50, 1986.

P. A. Robertson, C. M. Foran, M. S. Croughan-minihane, and S. J. Kilpatrick, Head entrapment and neonatal outcome by mode of delivery in breech deliveries from twenty-four to twenty-seven weeks of gestation, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.173, pp.1171-1177, 1995.

S. Michel, A. Drain, E. Closset, P. Deruelle, and D. Subtil, Evaluation of decisional elements of vaginal delivery in case of breech presentation in 19 university hospitals in France

, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.38, pp.411-431, 2009.

D. Broche, R. Ramanah, C. A. Mangin, M. Vidal, C. Maillet et al., Présentation du siège à terme : facteurs prédictifs de césarienne en cours de travail, J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod, vol.37, pp.483-92, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jgyn.2008.03.011

H. Roman, M. Carayol, L. Watier, L. Ray, C. Breart et al., Planned vaginal delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: prenatal determinants predictive of elevated risk of cesarean delivery during labor, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.138, pp.14-22, 2008.

B. Blondel, M. Kermarec, and . Enquête-nationale-périnatale, les naissances en 2010 et leur évolution depuis 2003. | Base documentaire | 2011, 2010.

, Déclenchement artificiel du travail à partir de 37 semaines d'aménorrhée-HAS 2008-n, 2017.

S. Wood, S. Cooper, and S. Ross, Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.121, pp.674-685, 2014.

E. Mishanina, E. Rogozinska, T. Thatthi, R. Uddin-khan, K. S. Khan et al., Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis, CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can, vol.186, pp.665-73, 2014.

K. S. Gibson, T. P. Waters, and J. L. Bailit, Maternal and neonatal outcomes in electively induced low-risk term pregnancies, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.211, 2014.

F. Goffinet, M. Dreyfus, B. Carbonne, G. Magnin, and D. Cabrol,

, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.32, pp.638-684, 2003.

A. M. Gülmezoglu, C. A. Crowther, P. Middleton, and E. Heatley, Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, p.4945, 2012.

M. R. Dare, P. Middleton, C. A. Crowther, V. J. Flenady, and B. Varatharaju, Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more), Cochrane Database Syst Rev, p.5302, 2006.

C. M. Koopmans, D. Bijlenga, H. Groen, S. Vijgen, J. G. Aarnoudse et al., Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks' gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial, Lancet Lond Engl, vol.374, pp.60736-60740, 2009.

T. P. Bernardes, K. Broekhuijsen, C. M. Koopmans, K. E. Boers, L. Van-wyk et al., Caesarean section rates and adverse neonatal outcomes after induction of labour versus expectant management in women with an unripe cervix: a secondary analysis of the HYPITAT and DIGITAT trials, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.123, pp.1501-1509, 2016.

I. F. Casson, C. A. Clarke, C. V. Howard, O. Mckendrick, S. Pennycook et al., Outcomes of pregnancy in insulin dependent diabetic women: results of a five year population cohort study, BMJ, vol.315, pp.275-283, 1997.

S. K. Abell, J. A. Boyle, B. De-courten, G. Soldatos, E. M. Wallace et al., Impact of type 2 diabetes, obesity and glycaemic control on pregnancy outcomes, Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.57, pp.308-322, 2017.

O. Langer, M. D. Berkus, R. W. Huff, and A. Samueloff, Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing greater than or equal to 4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section?, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.165, pp.831-838, 1991.

K. Weizsaecker, J. E. Deaver, and W. R. Cohen, Labour characteristics and neonatal Erb's palsy, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.114, pp.1003-1012, 2007.

D. L. Conway and O. Langer, Elective delivery of infants with macrosomia in diabetic women: reduced shoulder dystocia versus increased cesarean deliveries, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.178, pp.922-927, 1998.

P. Rozenberg,

, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.45, pp.1037-1081, 2016.

M. Boulvain, M. Senat, F. Perrotin, N. Winer, G. Beucher et al., Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial, Lancet Lond Engl, vol.385, issue.14, pp.61904-61912, 2015.

V. Flenady, L. Koopmans, P. Middleton, J. F. Frøen, G. C. Smith et al., Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Lancet Lond Engl, vol.377, issue.10, pp.62233-62240, 2011.

B. Jacobsson, K. Ahlin, A. Francis, G. Hagberg, H. Hagberg et al., Cerebral palsy and restricted growth status at birth: population-based case-control study, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.115, pp.1250-1255, 2008.

K. E. Boers, S. Vijgen, D. Bijlenga, J. Van-der-post, .. M. Bekedam et al., Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT), BMJ, vol.341, p.7087, 2010.

. Cngof_2013_final_rpc_rciu, , 2017.

E. H. Bishop, . Pelvic, . For, and . Induction, Obstet Gynecol, vol.24, pp.266-274, 1964.

A. Liu, J. Lv, Y. Hu, J. Lang, L. Ma et al., Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Obstet Gynaecol Res, vol.40, pp.897-906, 2014.

M. Jozwiak, K. Bloemenkamp, A. J. Kelly, B. Mol, O. Irion et al., Mechanical methods for induction of labour, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, p.1233, 2012.

W. Chen, J. Xue, M. K. Peprah, S. W. Wen, M. Walker et al., A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.123, pp.346-54, 2016.

G. Barda, H. Ganer, R. Sagiv, and J. Bar, Foley catheter vs. intravaginal prostaglandins E2 for cervical ripening in women at term with an unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial, J MaternFetal Neonatal Med Off J Eur Assoc Perinat Med Fed Asia Ocean Perinat Soc Int Soc Perinat Obstet, vol.2017, pp.1-9

A. C. Sciscione, C. L. Bedder, M. K. Hoffman, K. Ruhstaller, and P. A. Shlossman, The timing of adverse events with Foley catheter preinduction cervical ripening; implications for outpatient use, Am J Perinatol, vol.31, pp.781-787, 2014.

J. Burgos, I. Arana, I. Garitano, L. Rodríguez, P. Cobos et al., Induction of labor in breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study, J Perinat Med, vol.0, 2016.

, NICE guideline CG70 n, 2008.

M. Faivre, N. Mottet, A. Bourtembourg, R. Ramanah, R. Maillet et al.,

, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.45, pp.585-91, 2016.

A. J. Breeson, G. T. Kovacs, B. G. Pickles, and J. G. Hill, Extradural Analgesia-the Preferred Method of Analgesia for Vaginal Breech Delivery, Br J Anaesth, vol.50, pp.1227-1257, 1978.

C. O'herlihy, Vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel and breech presentation, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.11, pp.299-303, 1981.

G. Fait, Y. Daniel, J. B. Lessing, A. Bar-am, I. Gull et al., Can labor with breech presentation be induced?, Gynecol Obstet Invest, vol.46, pp.181-187, 1998.

S. Bozhinova,

, Akusherstvo Ginekol, vol.37, pp.1-2, 1998.

N. Rojansky, A. Tsafrir, E. Ophir, and Y. Ezra, Induction of labor in breech presentation, Int J Gynecol Obstet, vol.74, pp.151-157, 2001.

P. Marzouk, E. Arnaud, J. Oury, and O. Sibony, Induction du travail et présentation du siège : expérience de la maternité de l'hôpital Robert-Debré, J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod, vol.40, pp.668-74, 2011.

J. Clinch, Induction of labour, Br Med J, vol.2, p.934, 1979.

J. H. Shepherd, M. J. Bennett, D. Laurence, F. Moore, and C. D. Sims, Prostaglandin vaginal suppositories: a simple and safe approach to the induction of labor, Obstet Gynecol, vol.58, pp.596-600, 1981.

E. Azria, L. Meaux, J. Khoshnood, B. , A. S. Subtil et al., Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes for term breech fetuses with planned vaginal delivery, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.207, pp.285-286, 2012.

G. Macharey, V. Ulander, S. Heinonen, K. Kostev, M. Nuutila et al., Induction of labor in breech presentations at term: a retrospective observational study, Arch Gynecol Obstet, vol.293, pp.549-55, 2016.

G. Bleu, J. Demetz, S. Michel, A. Drain, V. Houfflin-debarge et al., Effectiveness and safety of induction of labor for term breech presentations, J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod n.d

A. Jarniat, V. Eluard, O. Martz, P. Calmelet, A. Calmelet et al., Induced labour at term and breech presentation: Experience of a level IIB French maternity, J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 2017.

J. Schaal and M. Dreyfus, Rythme cardiaque foetal pendant le travail Définitions et Interprétation Alain Martin n, 2017.

, CNGOF_2014_HPP, 2017.

J. Burgos, L. Rodríguez, P. Cobos, C. Osuna, D. M. Centeno et al., Management of breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience, J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinat Assoc, vol.35, pp.803-811, 2015.

O. Irion, P. Hirsbrunner-almagbaly, and A. Morabia, Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section: a study of 705 singleton term breech presentations, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.105, pp.710-717, 1998.

F. Golfier, F. Vaudoyer, R. Ecochard, F. Champion, P. Audra et al., Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, vol.98, pp.186-92, 2001.

C. Rietberg, P. M. Elferink-stinkens, R. Brand, A. J. Van-loon, V. Hemel et al., Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants, BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.110, pp.604-613, 2003.

E. F. Magann, D. A. Doherty, A. T. Sandlin, S. P. Chauhan, and J. C. Morrison, The effects of an increasing gradient of maternal obesity on pregnancy outcomes, Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, vol.53, pp.250-257, 2013.

N. Heslehurst, H. Simpson, L. J. Ells, J. Rankin, J. Wilkinson et al., The impact of maternal BMI status on pregnancy outcomes with immediate short-term obstetric resource implications: a meta-analysis, Obes Rev Off J Int Assoc Study Obes, vol.9, pp.635-83, 2008.

E. M. Fyfe, N. H. Anderson, R. A. North, E. Chan, R. S. Taylor et al., Risk of first-stage and second-stage cesarean delivery by maternal body mass index among nulliparous women in labor at term, Obstet Gynecol, vol.117, pp.1315-1337, 2011.

H. Wolfe, J. Timofeev, E. Tefera, S. Desale, and R. W. Driggers, Risk of cesarean in obese nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: elective induction vs expectant management at term, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.211, pp.53-54, 2014.

D. Broche, D. Riethmuller, C. Vidal, J. Sautière, J. Schaal et al.,

, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), vol.34, pp.781-789, 2005.

M. Feghali, J. Timofeev, C. Huang, R. Driggers, M. Miodovnik et al., Preterm induction of labor: predictors of vaginal delivery and labor curves, Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol.212, pp.91-92, 2015.

D. Kolkman, C. Verhoeven, S. J. Brinkhorst, J. Van-der-post, E. Pajkrt et al., The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success: a systematic review, Am J Perinatol, vol.30, pp.625-655, 2013.

D. Navve, N. Orenstein, R. Ribak, Y. Daykan, G. Shechter-maor et al., Is the Bishop-score significant in predicting the success of labor induction in multiparous women?, J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinat Assoc, vol.37, pp.480-483, 2017.

Y. M. Kim, J. Y. Park, J. Sung, S. Choi, S. Oh et al., Predicting factors for success of vaginal delivery in preterm induction with prostaglandin E2, Obstet Gynecol Sci, vol.60, pp.163-172, 2017.

L. Hejl, E. Perdriolle-galet, E. Gauchotte, R. Callec, and O. Morel,

, Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol, 2017.

«. Le, Prognostic index for vaginal delivery » était réalisé à l'entrée en salle de naissance. Il a été évalué

, La patiente est installée en décubitus dorsal, jambes en demi-flexion. Le siège est désengagé du pelvis et remonté par la main pelvienne, l'autre main, par pression sur la tête

, Selon la méta-analyse de Hofmeyr, comprenant six essais prospectifs randomisés, la version par manoeuvre externe (VME) diminue la fréquence des présentations non céphaliques à terme

, ? Principaux facteurs prédictifs de réussite de la VME dans la littérature