, J. Magn. Magn. Mater, vol.320, p.1217, 2008.
, Appl. Phys. Lett, vol.94, p.12502, 2009.
, Nature Mater, vol.9, p.721, 2010.
, Appl. Phys. Lett, vol.96, p.22514, 2010.
, Appl. Phys. Lett, vol.97, p.262502, 2010.
, IEEE Trans. Magn, vol.41, p.3238, 2005.
, , vol.7, p.377, 2008.
, IEEE Trans. Magn, vol.41, p.2828, 2005.
, Appl. Phys. Lett, vol.87, p.12504, 2005.
, Appl. Phys. Lett, vol.94, p.202509, 2009.
In the AF-coupled case, the preferred precession direction for the harder layer (#2) is counterclockwise to the direction of the anisotropy field, whereas the softer layer (#1) wishes to precess counterclockwise to exchange field coming from layer #2 (which is opposite to the direction of the hard layer anisotropy field for AF coupling). Thus, the two layers wish to precess with opposite cyclicity ,
, Appl. Phys. Lett, vol.96, p.212504, 2010.
, J. Magn. Magn. Mater, vol.159, p.1, 1996.
, Phys. Rev. B, vol.72, p.14446, 2005.
, J. Appl. Phys, vol.71, p.5579, 1992.
, Appl. Phys. Lett, vol.95, p.262504, 2009.
, IEEE Trans. Magn, vol.43, p.2145, 2007.
, IEEE Trans. Magn, vol.47, p.63, 2011.
, J. Appl. Phys, vol.101, pp.9-102, 2007.
, Phys. Rev. B, vol.80, p.180415, 2009.
, IEEE Trans. Magn, vol.46, p.2056, 2010.
, Appl. Phys. Lett, vol.96, p.152502, 2010.
, J. Magn. Magn. Mater, vol.320, p.3019, 2008.
, Appl. Phys. Lett, vol.98, p.82501, 2011.