]. S. Murgo and H. Vermeulen, Dépistageducancerdusein.Pourquoi?Comment? Belgique:HopitalErasme,CHUTivoli, DQE(f)offourgenerations ofcomputedradiographyacquisitiondevices, p.158193, 1995.

H. Fujita, D. Y. Tsai, T. Itoh, K. Doi, J. Morishita et al., A simple method for determiningthemodulationtransferfunctionindigitalradiography, IEEETransMeddImaging, vol.114, p.349, 1992.

W. Hillen, U. Schiebel, T. Zaengel, P. Monnin, D. Gutierrez et al., Performancecomparison ofanactivematrixflatpanelimager,computedradiographysystem,andascreenfilmsystematfour standardradiationqualitiesFullfield digital mammography designed as a complete systemPhysical measures of image quality in photostimulable phosphor radiographicsystemsFundamentalsofdigitalmammography:physics,technologyandpracticalconsiderationsEvaluationofdetectordynamicrangeinthexrayexposuredomaininmammography:acomparison betweenfilmscreenandflatpaneldetectorsystems, 34350,Feb2005. [6] S. MullerProc.SPIEContrastdetaildetectabilityanalysis:comparisonof adigitalspotmammographysystemandananalogscreenfilmmammographysystem, p.744512534328338261421, 1997.

]. U. Bick, M. L. Giger, R. A. Schmidt, R. M. Nishikawa, and . Doi, Densitycorrectionofperipheralbreast tissueondigitalmammogramsComparingthe performanceofmammographicenhancementalgorithms:apreferencestudy, RadiographicsAJRAmJRoentgenol, vol.16175, issue.11, p.1403114551, 1996.

K. R. Bijkerk and . Vanderburght, AreviewofmathematicalmethodsformeasuringimagequalityInterfacultyReactor InstituteManualContrastDetailphantomArtinis CDMAMtype3, 2004.

R. S. Saunders and E. Samei, Resolution and noise measurements of five CRT and LCD medical displays, Medical Physics, vol.3, issue.2, p.30819, 2006.
DOI : 10.1177/153303460400300503

M. B. Williams, P. U. Simoni, L. Smilowitz, M. Stanton, W. Phillips et al., Analysis of the detectivequantumefficiencyofadevelopmentaldetectorfordigitalmammography, p.227385, 1999.

]. M. Williams, M. J. Yaffe, A. D. Maidment, M. C. Martin, J. A. Seibert et al., Imagequality indigitalmammography:imageacquisitionImagingperformanceofamorphousseleniumbased flatpanel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detectorDoes image quality matter? Impactofresolutionandnoiseonmammographictaskperformance, 25463,Feb2003. [21], p.589608397181, 2006.

]. E. Maggi, T. Hans-roehrig, and . Yu, Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrastdetailanalysisPhysical and psychophysical evaluation of digital systems for mammography, ProcSPIE, vol.332436, p.4198209124134, 1995.

R. M. Gagne, J. S. Boswell, and . Myers, Signaldetectabilityindigitalradiography:spatialdomain figuresofmerit, p.218093, 2003.

R. M. Gagne, B. D. Gallas, ]. S. Myers, G. Muller, R. Peter et al., Towardobjectiveandquantitativeevaluationofimaging systemsusingimagesofphantomsCancer du sein et qualité image en mammographie rendu de fin de recherche d'opération d'une recherche financée par le MinistèredelarechercheLesaspectstechniquesetpratiquedelaradioprotectionenmammographie, GE Medical SystemsCentreAlexis Vautrin, vol.33, p.8395

]. A. Ramee, Aspects technologiques de la mammographie, CHU Rennes Département Imagerie Médicale et de Radiologie Hôpital Sud HôtelDieu

A. Noelandj, M. Stines, ]. S. Spahn31, A. Vedantham, S. Karellas et al., ImagerieedelaFemmeFlatdetectorsandtheirclinicalapplicationsMammographic imaging with a small format CCDbased digital cassette: physical characteristicsofaclinicalsystem, CDCOM Manual: software for automated readout of CDMAM 3.4 images, p.5054, 2003.

N. Karssemeijerandm, . E. Thijssen35-]-c, R. F. Metz, K. Wagner, D. G. Doi et al., Determinationofcontrastdetailcurvesofmammographysystems byautomatedimageanalysis.Digitalmammography96Towardconsensuson quantitativeassessmentofmedicalimagingsystems, p.155160105761, 1995.

J. T. Dobbins, E. Samei, N. T. Ranger, Y. Chen, E. Samei et al., Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization.II.NoisepowerspectrumIntercomparisonofmethodsforimagequality characterization.I.Modulationtransferfunction, MedicalElectricalequipmentCharacteristicsofdigitalXrayimagingdevicesPart1 2: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency Mammography detectors," International Recommendation2005, p.146675145465, 2006.

]. A. Noel, J. Stines, and . Zerhouni, Développementd'unfantômeenmatériauéquivalentseinpourla mammographie, p.421423, 1993.

R. M. Nishikawa-]-j, . N. Dobbins-]-o, K. E. Morgun, Y. V. Nemchenko, and . Rogov, The Fundamentals of MTF, Wiener Spectra, and DQEEffectsofundersamplingontheproperinterpretationofmodulationtransferfunction, noisepowerspectra,andnoiseequivalentquantaofdigitalimagingsystemsDetective Quantum Efficiency as a Quality ParameterofImagingEquipement, BiomedicalEngineering, vol.2237, p.17181258261, 1995.

K. Stierstorferandm and . Spahn, Selfnormalizingmethodtomeasurethedetectivequantumefficiency ofawiderangeofxraydetectors, p.13129

U. Neitzel, S. Guntherkohfahl, G. Borasi, E. Samei, R. S. Saunders et al., Determination of the detective quantum efficiencyofadigitalxraydetector:comparisonofthreeevaluationsusingacommonimagedatasetAcomparisonbetweenobjectiveandsubjectiveimagequalitymeasurementsfora fullfielddigitalmammographysystemComparingthePerformance ofDigitalMammographySystemsA method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographicimages, Aug2004. [46] N.W.Marshall, pp.22051124412463-735739300617, 2003.

R. F. Aufrichtig-]-r, . G. Wagnerandd, and . Brown, Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screenfilmbasedimagingsystemforthoracicradiography, p.134958

B. Grosjean and L. Moisan, Acontrario detectability of spots in textured backgroundsLesionDetectabilityinDigitalMammography:ImpactofTexture, Journal of MathematicallImagingandVision, vol.33, p.313337275, 2007.

M. Yip, A. Alsager, E. Lewis, K. C. Wells, and . Young, Validation of a Digital Mammography Image Simulation Chain with Automated Scoring of CDMAM Images, Internationall Workshop on Digital Mammography, p.409416, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_57

]. E. Samei, E. Buhr, P. Granfors, D. Vandenbroucke, and X. Wang, Comparison of edge analysis techniquesforthedeterminationoftheMTFofdigitalradiographicsystems, PhysMeddBiol, vol.50, p.361325, 2005.

I. A. Cunningham and A. Fenster, A method for modulation transfer function determination from edge profiles with correction for finiteelement differentiation, Medd Phys, vol.14, p.5337, 1987.

P. B. Greerandt and . Vandoorn, EvaluationofanalgorithmfortheassessmentoftheMTFusinganedge method, p.204859, 2000.

K. Nykanenands, . N. Siltanen-]-v, J. M. Cooper, J. A. Boone, . J. Seibert et al., XrayscatteringinfullfielddigitalmammographyAnedgespreadtechniquefor measurementofthescattertoprimaryratioinmammography, p.18647384553, 2000.

]. K. Cranley, B. J. Gilmore, G. Fogarty, and . Desponds, CatalogueofdiagnosticXrayspectraandother data, DiagnosticRadiologyandMagneticResonanceSpecialInterestGroupoftheInstituteofPhysics andEngineeringinMedicine, 1997.

]. G. Borasi, A. Nitrosi, P. Ferrari, and D. Tassoni, On site evaluation of three flat panel detectors for digitalradiography, ImageJ, vol.3031, p.171931, 2007.

B. E. Meyerp, . Mertzl, . Kennelc, S. Constantinescoa, J. P. Hogge et al., EvaluationoftheuseofsixdiagnosticX rayspectracomputercodesTheBritishjournalofRadiologyRandomJQualityAssuranceinMammography:ArtifactAnalysisImagequalityassessment:fromerrorvisibility tostructuralsimilarity, BaronLopez, E. SanchezFont, and L. ParrasGuijosa, Bioestadistica: Metodos y Aplicaciones, p.22423050352260012, 1998.

K. Karila, Performanceofxraygeneratorsandunnecessarydoseinmammography, Radiology, vol.144, p.395401, 1991.

]. A. Ramee, C. Philippe, . Bourguet-rennes1facultédemédecinehôpitalsudrennes, O. S. France, A. Suryanarayanan et al., ImagerieparlesrayonsXetradioprotectionAperceptualevaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrastdetail characteristics, Mar2004. [76] M.YaffeandJ.Rowlands, p.139, 1997.

A. Noel and F. Thibault, Digital detectors for mammography: the technical challenges, European Radiology, vol.30, issue.11, 2004.
DOI : 10.1117/12.430858

]. S. Vedantham, A. Karellas, S. Suryanarayanan, D. Albagli, S. Han et al., Fullbreastdigitalmammography withanamorphoussiliconbasedflatpaneldetector:physicalcharacteristicsofaclinicalprototype, p.55867, 2000.