J. C. Alexander, Unlimited Shareholder Liability through a Procedural Lens, Harvard Law Review, vol.106, issue.2, pp.387-445, 1992.
DOI : 10.2307/1341704

. Anonymous, Liability of Parent Corporations for Hazardous Waste Cleanup and Damages, Harvard Law Review, vol.99, pp.986-1003, 1986.

D. B. Audretsch and M. Feldman, Knowledge Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production, American Economic Review, vol.86, pp.630-640, 1996.

F. Baumann, T. Friehe, and K. Grechenig, A note on the optimality of (even more) incomplete strict liability, International Review of Law and Economics, vol.31, issue.2, pp.77-82, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.irle.2011.01.004

T. R. Beard, Bankruptcy and Care Choice, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.21, issue.4, pp.626-634, 1990.
DOI : 10.2307/2555473

J. Boyd and D. E. Ingberman, Noncompensatory Damages and Potential Insolvency, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.23, issue.2, pp.895-910, 1994.
DOI : 10.1086/467949

J. Boyd and D. E. Ingberman, The " Polluter Pays Principle " : Should Liability Be Extended When the Polluter Cannot Pay ? The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, pp.182-203, 1996.

M. Boyer and J. J. Laffont, Environmental risks and bank liability, European Economic Review, vol.41, issue.8, pp.1427-1459, 1997.
DOI : 10.1016/S0014-2921(96)00034-7

URL : http://www.cirano.qc.ca/pdf/publication/94s-22.pdf

J. P. Brown, Toward an Economic Theory of Liability, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.2, issue.2, pp.323-349, 1973.
DOI : 10.1086/467501

O. Cadot and B. Sinclair-desgagné, Environmental Standards and Industrial Policy, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.29, issue.2, pp.228-237, 1995.
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1995.1043

M. Callon, Le réseau comme forme émergente et comme modalité de coordination : Le cas des interactions stratégiques entre firmes industrielles et laboratoires académiques, Réseau et coordination, pp.13-64, 1999.

S. Chemarin and C. Orset, Innovation and Information Acquisition under Time Inconsistency and Uncertainty. The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 2010.
DOI : 10.1057/grir.2010.9

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01000141

W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.35, issue.1, pp.128-152, 1990.
DOI : 10.2307/2393553

G. Dari-mattiacci and G. De-geest, Judgment Proofness under Four Different Precaution Technologies, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE, vol.161, issue.1, pp.38-56, 2005.
DOI : 10.1628/0932456054254470

G. Dari-mattiacci and G. De-geest, When will judgment proof injurers take too much precaution?, International Review of Law and Economics, vol.26, issue.3, pp.336-354, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.irle.2006.11.005

P. Dasgupta and P. A. David, Toward a new economics of science, Research Policy, vol.23, pp.487-521, 1994.

P. Dasgupta and J. Stiglitz, Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R&D, The Bell Journal of Economics, vol.11, issue.1, pp.1-28, 1980.
DOI : 10.2307/3003398

C. Aspremont and A. Jacquemin, Cooperative and Noncooperative RD in Duopoly with Spillovers, American Economic Review, vol.78, pp.1133-1137, 1988.

M. David and B. Sinclair-desgagné, Pollution Abatement Subsidies and the Eco-Industry, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.41, issue.5, pp.271-282, 2010.
DOI : 10.2190/JAVL-DV4H-Q218-ERHR

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01172938

M. David, A. D. Nimubona, and B. Sinclair-desgagné, Emission taxes and the market for abatement goods and services, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.33, issue.1, pp.179-191, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.04.010

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01019345

B. Deffains, L'évalution des règles de droit : un bilan de l'analyse économique de la responsabilité. Revue d'Economie Politique, pp.751-785, 2000.

B. Deffains, Analyse économique de la responsabilité étendue en cas d'insolvabilité des pollueurs, pp.149-169, 2001.

B. Deffains and D. Demougin, Customary versus technological advancement tests, International Review of Law and Economics, vol.28, issue.2, pp.106-112, 2008.
DOI : 10.1016/j.irle.2008.02.006

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00279242

B. Deffains and D. Demougin, The Standard of Proof Revisited. German Working Papers in Law and Economics, 2008.

B. Deffains and L. Franckx, Welfare improving ignorance and negligence rule, European Journal of Law and Economics, vol.9, issue.1, pp.1-7, 2009.
DOI : 10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24

A. P. Dempster, Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol.38, issue.2, pp.325-339, 1967.
DOI : 10.1214/aoms/1177698950

M. H. Depret and A. Hamdouch, Quelles politiques de l'innovation et de l'environnement pour quelle dynamique d'innovation environmentale ? Innovations -Cahiers d'Economie de l'Innovation, pp.127-147, 2009.

A. M. Diamond and . Jr, The economics of science, Knowledge and Policy, vol.9, issue.5, pp.6-49, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4757-1926-0

G. Dionne and S. Spaeter, Environmental risk and extended liability: The case of green technologies, Journal of Public Economics, vol.87, issue.5-6, pp.1025-1060, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00160-8

P. B. Downing and L. J. White, Innovation in pollution control, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.13, issue.1, pp.18-29, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0095-0696(86)90014-8

F. H. Easterbrook and D. R. Fischel, Limited Liability and the Corporation. The University of Chicago Law Review, pp.89-117, 1985.

L. Eeckhoudt and M. Jeleva, Décision médicale et probabilités imprécises, Revue Economique, vol.55, pp.869-882, 2004.

D. Ellsberg, Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.75, issue.4, pp.643-669, 1961.
DOI : 10.2307/1884324

A. Endres, The Economics of Accident Law : Discounted Expected Damage, Suboptimal Due Care Standards, and the Role of a " Negligence tax, Public Finance, vol.46, pp.198-207, 1991.

A. Endres and R. Bertram, The development of care technology under liability law, International Review of Law and Economics, vol.26, issue.4, pp.503-518, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.irle.2007.01.004

A. Endres and T. Friehe, Incentives to diffuse advanced abatement technology under environmental liability law, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.62, issue.1, pp.30-40, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jeem.2010.12.001

A. Endres, R. Bertram, and B. Rundshagen, Environmental Liability Law and Induced Technical Change ??? The Role of Discounting, Environmental and Resource Economics, vol.91, issue.3, pp.341-366, 2007.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.91.1.260

A. Endres, R. Bertram, and B. Rundshagen, Environmental Liability Law and Induced Technical Change: The Role of Spillovers, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE, vol.164, issue.2, pp.254-279, 2008.
DOI : 10.1628/093245608784514446

J. Etner, M. Jeleva, and J. M. Tallon, DECISION THEORY UNDER AMBIGUITY, Journal of Economic Surveys, vol.21, issue.2, 2011.
DOI : 10.1002/bs.3830210104

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00643580

G. Fallet, C. Duval, P. Weber, and C. Simon, Characterization and propagation of uncertainties in complex socio-technical system risk analyses, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00462252

M. Faure, Economic models of compensation for damage caused by nuclear accidents: Some lessons for the revision of the Paris and Vienna Conventions, European Journal of Law and Economics, vol.43, issue.6, pp.21-43, 1995.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01540822

M. Feldman, The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol.87, issue.1, pp.5-25, 1999.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.93.23.12709

C. Fischer, I. W. Parry, and W. A. Pizer, Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.45, issue.3, pp.1025-1060, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00002-0

URL : http://www.rff.org/rff/documents/rff-dp-99-04.pdf

C. Fluet, Régulation des risques et insolvabilité : le rôle de la responsabilité pour faute en information imparfaite. L'Actualité économique, pp.379-399, 1999.
DOI : 10.7202/602296ar

URL : http://www.erudit.org/fr/revues/ae/1999-v75-n1-2-3-ae2772/602296ar.pdf

T. Friehe, A note on judgment proofness and risk aversion, European Journal of Law and Economics, vol.59, issue.2, pp.109-118, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/s10657-007-9029-3

I. Gilboa and D. Schmeidler, Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.18, issue.2, pp.141-153, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0304-4068(89)90018-9

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00753237

R. Giraud and J. M. Tallon, Are Beliefs a Matter of Taste ? A case for Objective Imprecise Information. CES Working Papers, p.86, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00442869

C. Gollier, P. F. Koehl, and J. C. Rochet, Risk-Taking Behavior with Limited Liability and Risk Aversion, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol.64, issue.2, pp.347-370, 1997.
DOI : 10.2307/253734

URL : http://wrdsenet.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/wfic/papers/96/9613.pdf

H. S. Gravelle, Accidents, Taxes, Liability Rules and Insurance. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, pp.115-131, 1987.
DOI : 10.1057/gpp.1987.9

J. A. Grundfest, The Limited Future of Unlimited Liability : A Capital Market Perspective. The Yale Law Review, pp.387-425, 1992.

P. Halpern, M. Trebilcock, and S. Turnbull, An Economic Analysis of Limited Liability in Corporation Law, The University of Toronto Law Journal, vol.30, issue.2, pp.117-150, 1980.
DOI : 10.2307/825483

H. Hansmann and R. Kraakman, Toward Unlimited Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts. The Yale Law Review, pp.1878-1934, 1991.

J. Hartwick, Optimal R&D levels when firm j benefits from firm i's inventive activity, Economics Letters, vol.16, issue.1-2, pp.165-170, 1984.
DOI : 10.1016/0165-1765(84)90158-7

C. Helm and A. Schöttner, Subsidizing Technological Innovations in the Presence of R&D Spillovers, German Economic Review, vol.44, issue.3, pp.339-353, 2008.
DOI : 10.2307/2098683

Y. Hiriart, D. Martimort, and J. Pouyet, On the optimal use of ex ante regulation and ex post liability, Economics Letters, vol.84, issue.2, pp.231-235, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2004.02.007

J. Y. Jaffray, G??n??ralisation du crit??re de l'utilit?? esp??r??e aux choix dans l'incertain r??gulier, RAIRO - Operations Research, vol.23, issue.3, pp.237-267, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/3439089

J. Y. Jaffray, Linear Utility Theory And Belief Functions: A Discussion, 1989.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-011-3146-9_19

J. Y. Jaffray, Linear utility theory for belief functions, Operations Research Letters, vol.8, issue.2, pp.107-112, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-6377(89)90010-2

J. Jaffray, Bayesian updating and belief functions, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol.22, issue.5, pp.1144-1152, 1992.
DOI : 10.1109/21.179852

M. Jeleva, Demand for Insurance with Imprecise Probabilities, Finance, vol.18, pp.101-114, 1997.

C. Jung, K. Krutilla, and R. Boyd, Incentives for Advanced Pollution Abatement Technology at the Industry Level: An Evaluation of Policy Alternatives, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.30, issue.1, pp.95-111, 1996.
DOI : 10.1006/jeem.1996.0007

P. Klibanoff, M. Marinacci, and S. Mukerji, A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity, Econometrica, vol.73, issue.6, pp.1849-1892, 2005.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00640.x

E. Langlais, Responsabilit?? civile et contr??le des activit??s repr??sentant des risques mal connus, Revue ??conomique, vol.62, issue.3, pp.589-598, 2011.
DOI : 10.3917/reco.623.0589

D. W. Leebron, Limited Liability, Tort Victims, and Creditors, Columbia Law Review, vol.91, issue.7, pp.1565-1650, 1991.
DOI : 10.2307/1123093

G. C. Loury, Market Structure and Innovation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.93, issue.3, pp.395-410, 1979.
DOI : 10.2307/1883165

W. A. Magat, Pollution control and technological advance: A dynamic model of the firm, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.5, issue.1, pp.1-25, 1978.
DOI : 10.1016/0095-0696(78)90002-5

W. A. Magat, The effects of environmental regulation on innovation. Law and Contemporary Problems, pp.3-25, 1979.

D. Martimort and Y. Hiriart, The Benefits of Extended Liability, Rand Journal of Economics, vol.37, pp.562-582, 2006.

S. Martin, Spillovers, Appropriability, and RD, Journal of Economics, vol.75, issue.1, pp.1-32, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/s007120200000

K. F. Mccardle, Information Acquisition and the Adoption of New Technology, Management Science, vol.31, issue.11, pp.31-1372, 1985.
DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.31.11.1372

T. J. Miceli and K. Segerson, A note on optimal care by wealth-constrained injurers, International Review of Law and Economics, vol.23, issue.3, pp.273-284, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/j.irle.2003.09.004

S. R. Milliman and R. Prince, Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.17, issue.3, pp.247-265, 1989.
DOI : 10.1016/0095-0696(89)90019-3

J. Nussim and A. D. Tabbach, A revised model of unilateral accidents, International Review of Law and Economics, vol.29, issue.2, pp.169-177, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.irle.2008.05.001

C. Orset, Irreversible investment and information acquisition under uncertainty. INRA-AgroParisTech, p.1, 2010.

I. W. Parry, Environmental policy and innovation, Economic Research Service, 1994.

I. W. Parry, Optimal pollution taxes and endogenous technological progress, Resource and Energy Economics, vol.17, issue.1, pp.69-85, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0928-7655(94)00010-H

I. W. Parry, Pollution Regulation and the Efficiency Gains from Technological Innovation, Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol.14, issue.3, pp.229-254, 1998.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1008079223033

I. W. Parry, On the Implications of Technological Innovation for Environmental Policy. Resources For The Future, Discussion Paper, pp.1-44, 2001.

R. Pitchford, How Liable Should a Lender Be? The Case of Judgment-Proof Firms and Environmental Risk: Reply, American Economic Review, vol.91, issue.3, pp.1171-1186, 1995.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.91.3.739

T. Requate, Incentives to innovate under emission taxes and tradeable permits, European Journal of Political Economy, vol.14, issue.1, pp.139-165, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0176-2680(97)00048-7

URL : https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2909806/2911478

T. Requate, Timing and Commitment of Environmental Policy, Adoption of New Technology, and Repercussions on R&D, Environmental & Resource Economics, vol.87, issue.4, pp.175-199, 2005.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1430-9134.1995.00663.x

T. Requate and W. Unold, Environmental policy incentives to adopt advanced abatement technology:, European Economic Review, vol.47, issue.1, pp.125-146, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00188-5

A. H. Ringleb and S. N. Wiggins, Liability and Large-Scale, Long-Term Hazards, Journal of Political Economy, vol.98, issue.3, pp.574-595, 1990.
DOI : 10.1086/261695

K. Roberts and M. L. Weitzman, Funding Criteria for Research, Development, and Exploration Projects, Econometrica, vol.49, issue.5, pp.1261-1288, 1981.
DOI : 10.2307/1912754

URL : http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/1721.1/35160/1/MIT-EL-79-009-06439420.pdf

B. Rolland, MetalEurop : le feuilleton, Journal des Accidents et des Catastrophes, vol.37, 2003.

B. Rolland, MetalEurop : la suite du feuilleton, Journal des Accidents et des Catastrophes, p.42, 2004.

B. Rolland, MetalEurop : épilogue ?, Journal des Accidents et des Catastrophes, p.51, 2005.

A. Schmitt and S. Spaeter, Risque nucl??aire civil et responsabilit?? optimale de l'exploitant, Revue ??conomique, vol.58, issue.6, pp.1331-1351, 2007.
DOI : 10.3917/reco.586.1331

A. Schwartz, Products Liability, Corporate Structure, and Bankruptcy: Toxic Substances and the Remote Risk Relationship, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.14, issue.3, pp.689-736, 1985.
DOI : 10.1086/467795

S. Shavell, Strict Liability versus Negligence, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.9, issue.1, pp.1-25, 1980.
DOI : 10.1086/467626

S. Shavell, A Model of the Optimal Use of Liability and Safety Regulation, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.15, issue.2, pp.271-280, 1984.
DOI : 10.2307/2555680

S. Shavell, The judgment proof problem, International Review of Law and Economics, vol.6, issue.1, pp.45-58, 1986.
DOI : 10.1016/0144-8188(86)90038-4

S. Shavell, Liability and the Incentive to Obtain Information about Risk, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.21, issue.2, pp.259-270, 1992.
DOI : 10.1086/467907

S. Shavell, Minimum asset requirements and compulsory liability insurance as solutions to the judgment-proof problem, RAND Journal of Economics, vol.36, pp.63-77, 2005.

C. Simon and P. Weber, Analyse de la fiabilité imprécise des systèmes par les réseaux de fonctions de croyance, 2008.

R. M. Solow, A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.70, issue.1, pp.65-94, 1956.
DOI : 10.2307/1884513

J. Summers, The Case of the Disappearing Defendant : An Economic Analysis, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol.132, pp.145-185, 1983.

J. C. Teitelbaum, A Unilateral Accident Model under Ambiguity, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.36, issue.2, pp.431-477, 2007.
DOI : 10.1086/511895

W. K. Viscusi and M. J. Moore, Product Liability, Research and Development, and Innovation, Journal of Political Economy, vol.101, issue.1, pp.161-184, 1993.
DOI : 10.1086/261870

URL : http://discoverarchive.vanderbilt.edu/bitstream/1803/6596/1/Product%20Liability.pdf

M. Weitzman, Prices vs. Quantities, The Review of Economic Studies, vol.41, issue.4, pp.477-491, 1974.
DOI : 10.2307/2296698

M. J. White and D. Wittman, A Comparison of Taxes, Regulation, and Liability Rules under Imperfect Information, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol.12, issue.2, pp.413-425, 1983.
DOI : 10.1086/467730

B. D. Wright, The Economics of Invention Incentives : Patents, Prizes, and Research Contracts, American Economic Review, vol.73, pp.691-707, 1983.

R. O. Zerbe, THEORETICAL EFFICIENCY IN POLLUTION CONTROL, Economic Inquiry, vol.1, issue.4, pp.364-376, 1970.
DOI : 10.2307/139631

R. Livres, T. Arrow, and K. , Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Innovation, dans : The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity : Economic and Social Factors, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1962.

K. Arrow and L. Hurwicz, An optimality criterion for decision-making under ignorance, dans : Uncertainty and Expectations in Economics, 1972.

W. J. Baumol and W. E. Oates, The Theory of Environmental Policy, 1988.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9781139173513

G. Calabresi, The Cost of Accidents, a Legal and Economic Analysis, 1970.

C. Europ and . De-l-'ind, Chimique, (Cefic), Horizon, vol.2015, 2004.

C. Gollier, The Economics of Risk and Time, 2001.

J. R. Hicks, The Theory of Wages, 1932.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-349-00189-7

A. B. Jaffe, R. N. Newell, and R. G. Stavins, Technological change and the environment, dans : Handbook of Environmental Economics

A. Kneese and C. Schultze, Pollution, Price and Public Policy, 1975.

W. M. Landes and R. A. Posner, The Economic Structure of Tort Law, 1987.
DOI : 10.4159/harvard.9780674864030

E. Lefèvre, Fusion adaptée d'informations conflictuelles dans le cadre de la théorie de l'évidence. Application au diagnostic médical, 2001.

. Org, . La-coop, and . Et-le-dév, La mesure des activités scientifiques et technologiques -Principes directeurs proposés pour le receuil et l'interprétation des données sur l'innovation technologique -Manuel d'Oslo -2 me édition, Eco, 1997.

. Org, . La-coop, and . Et-le-dév, Frascati Manual 2002 : Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, Eco, 2002.

L. J. Savage, The Foundations of Statistics, 1954.

B. Sinclair-desgagné and C. Vachon, Dealing with Major Technological Risks, dans : Principles of Environmental and Resource Economics. A Guide for Students and Decision Makers, Folmer, H.L. Gabel, 2000.

.. Négligence-et-preuves-de-qualité-imparfaite, 57 2.2.2 Coupler régulation ex ante et régulation ex post pour palier aux problèmes informationnels, p.61

.. Une-préfèrence-pour-les-outils-market-based, 73 3.1.2 Instruments de politique environnementale et incitations à l'innovation : de multiples pistes de réflexion, p.75

R. Identification-des-spécificités-du-marché-de-la, 78 3.2.1 Innovateur vs non-innovateurs : la politique environnementale et industrielle face aux spillovers, p.78

.. La, 85 3.3.1 Introduction d'une " double dimension " : prévention et innovation, p.86
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00849479