.. Et-services-collaboratifs and .. , Chapitre 6 ? Travail Collaboratif Assisté par Ordinateur

P. La-méthode, « Practice and Usage-based Service enHancement, p.147

.. Le-point-de-vue-organisationnel and .. , Chapitre 9 ? La modélisation des pratiques

W. Aalst, The application of Petri nets to workflow management, Journal of circuits, pp.1-53, 1998.

R. S. Aguilar-savén, Business process modelling: Review and framework, International Journal of Production Economics, vol.90, issue.2, pp.129-149, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00102-6

P. Andersen, P. H. Carstensen, and M. Nielsen, Dimensions of coordination The fifth International Workshop on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modelling, pp.41-60, 2000.

R. Anderson, Representations and requirements: The value of ethnography in system design. Human-computer interaction, 1994.

J. Armand, 140 séquences pour mener une opération de construction: Des études préalables à l'achèvement de l'ouvrage: actions techniques et démarches administratives, 1997.

A. Arsanjani, Service-oriented modeling and architecture. IBM developer works, pp.1-15, 2004.

L. Avignon, A shared service terminology for online service provisioning, Proceedings of the 6th international Conference on Electroinic Commerce, pp.1-10, 2002.

D. Bain, R. Chalon, . David, and . Bt, Réalité Mixte, de la conception à l'implémentation: méthodologie de transformation de modélisations IRVO vers la plateforme WComp, Actes des quatrièmes journées de l'AFRV, 2009.

M. Baron, K-MADe, Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine , IHM '06, pp.287-288, 2006.
DOI : 10.1145/1132736.1132786

L. Bass, R. Faneuf, R. Little, L. Bass, P. Clements et al., A metamodel for the runtime architecture of an interactive system, Software Architecture in Practice, 1992.

K. Beck, Test-Driven Development by Example, 2003.

K. Bennett and P. Layzell, Service-based software: the future for flexible software, Proceedings Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engeering Conference. APSEC 2000, pp.214-221, 2000.
DOI : 10.1109/APSEC.2000.896702

O. Berard and J. Karlshoej, Information delivery manuals to integrate building product information into design, ITcon Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, vol.17, pp.64-74, 2012.

J. Bignon, G. Halin, and S. Kubicki, Qualité et processus de mise en oeuvre du bâtiment, Ramau 5 -La qualité architecturale, Acteurs et enjeux, pp.127-142, 2009.

C. P. Bispo, Applying a model-driven process for a collaborative service-oriented architecture, The 2010 14th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, pp.378-383, 2010.
DOI : 10.1109/CSCWD.2010.5471943

M. Bjekovic and S. Kubicki, Service quality description?a business perspective, 2011 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, pp.513-520, 2011.

B. C. Björk, A formalised model of the information and materials handling activities in the construction process, Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, pp.133-149, 2002.

B. C. Björk, Information Technology in Construction?domain definition and research issues, International Journal of Computer Integrated Design And Construction, vol.1, issue.1, pp.3-16, 1999.

J. Bobroff, Les formes d'organisation des projets, Ecosip, Pilotages de projet et entreprises: diversité et convergences, pp.35-39, 1993.

F. Bodart and J. Vanderdonckt, Widget standardisation through abstract interaction objects, Advances in Applied Ergonomics. USA publishing, pp.300-305, 1996.

B. Boehm, A spiral model of software development and enhancement, Computer, vol.21, issue.5, pp.61-72, 1988.
DOI : 10.1109/2.59

G. Booch, Object Oriented Analysis & Design with Application, 2007.

P. A. Booth, An Introduction To Human-Computer Interaction, 1989.

D. Bose, Component-Based Development -Application in software engineering Assistance à la conception coopérative fondée sur la sémantique des ouvrages, 2002.

E. Boucher, Software as a Service -Quelle est la maturité de ce marché et les possibilités d'utilisation par les entreprises?, 2009.

G. Bourguin and A. Derycke, Systèmes Interactifs en Co-évolution Réflexions sur les apports de la Théorie de l'Activité au support des Pratiques Collectives Distribuées. Revue d'Interaction Homme-Machine, pp.1-31, 2005.

A. Brown, J. Conallen, and D. Tropeano, Introduction: Models, Modeling, and Model-Driven Architecture (MDA), Model-driven Software Development, pp.1-16, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-28554-7_1

J. Bézivin and I. Kurtev, Model-based technology integration with the technical space concept, Metainformatics Symposium, 2005.

G. Calvary, A Unifying Reference Framework for multi-target user interfaces, Interacting with Computers, vol.16, issue.2???4, pp.289-308, 2003.
DOI : 10.1207/S15327051HCI16234_18

J. Cardoso, Quality of service for workflows and web service processes, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, pp.281-308, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.websem.2004.03.001

S. Cesare and M. Lycett, Business modelling with UML: distilling directions for future research, Enterprise information systems IV, pp.153-162, 2003.

Y. Chang, Y. Lim, and E. Stolterman, Personas, Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction building bridges, NordiCHI '08, pp.439-442, 2008.
DOI : 10.1145/1463160.1463214

G. Chen, Architectural Practice Simplified: A Survival Guide and Checklists for Building Construction and Site Improvements as Well as Tips on Architecture, Building Design, Construction and Project Management, 2009.

L. Cherbakov, Impact of service orientation at the business level, IBM Systems Journal, vol.44, issue.4, pp.653-668, 2005.
DOI : 10.1147/sj.444.0653

Y. Clot, De l???analyse des pratiques au d??veloppement des m??tiers, ??ducation et didactique, vol.1, issue.1, 2007.
DOI : 10.3917/dbu.baudo.2001.01

A. Cockburn, Writing Effective Use Cases, 2000.

A. Cockburn and S. Jones, Four principles of groupware design, Interacting with Computers, vol.3, issue.1, pp.195-210, 1995.
DOI : 10.1207/s15327051hci0301_2

M. Cohn, User stories applied: For agile software development, 2003.

L. Constantine, Structure and style in use cases for user interface design, Object Modeling and User Interface Design: Designing Interactive Systems, 2001.

L. Constantine, Process Agility and Software Usability: Toward Lightweight Usage- Centered Design, Development, vol.1, pp.1-10, 2001.

L. Constantine, USERS, ROLES, AND PERSONAS, The Persona Lifecycle, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-012566251-2/50009-5

L. Constantine and L. A. Lockwood, Usage-centered software engineering: an agile approach to integrating users, user interfaces, and usability into software engineering practice, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings., pp.746-747, 2003.
DOI : 10.1109/ICSE.2003.1201267

L. Constantine and H. Windl, Usage-Centered Design: Scalability and Integration with Software Engineering. Human-Computer Interaction: theory and Practice, 2003.

L. Constantine, Canonical abstract prototypes for abstract visual and interaction design Information Systems -Design, Specification, and Verification, pp.1-15, 2003.

L. Constantine, Rapid abstract prototyping, Software Development, pp.1-9, 1998.

C. Crawford, G. Bate, and L. Cherbakov, Toward an on demand service-oriented architecture, IBM Systems Journal, vol.44, issue.1, pp.81-107, 2005.
DOI : 10.1147/sj.441.0081

I. Crnkovic, S. Larsson, and M. Chaudron, Component-based development process and component lifecycle. Computing and Information Technology -CIT 13, pp.321-327, 2005.
DOI : 10.1109/icsea.2006.261300

URL : http://cit.fer.hr/index.php/CIT/article/download/1586/1290/

B. Curtis, Process modeling, Communications of the ACM, vol.35, issue.9, pp.75-90, 1992.
DOI : 10.1145/130994.130998

B. David, IHM pour les collecticiels. Réseaux et systèmes répartis, pp.169-206, 2001.

F. Davis, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, vol.13, issue.3, pp.319-340, 1989.
DOI : 10.2307/249008

W. Davis, The requirements specification, 1999.
DOI : 10.1201/9781420049107.ch35

A. Delgado, Tool support for Service Oriented development from Business Processes, 2nd International Workshop on Model-Driven Service Engineering (MOSE'10), 2010.

O. Delotte, CoCSys: une approche basée sur la construction d'un modèle comportemental pour la conception de systèmes collaboratifs mobiles, 2006.

P. Dewan, An Integrated Approach to Designing and Evaluating Collaborative Applications and Infrastructures, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW, pp.75-111, 2001.
DOI : 10.1145/192844.193014

A. Dey, Understanding and Using Context, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol.5, issue.1, p.261, 2001.
DOI : 10.1007/s007790170019

URL : http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fce/ctk/pubs/PeTe5-1.ps.gz

J. Dibbern, Design, implementation, and evaluation of an ICT-supported collaboration methodology for distributed requirements determination, 2009.

E. Dubois, P. Gray, and L. Nigay, ASUR++: A Design Notation for Mobile Mixed Systems, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction, pp.123-139, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-45756-9_11

S. Dupuy-chessa, Modélisation en Interaction Homme-Machine et en Système d'Information: A la croisée des chemins, 2011.

S. Dupuy-chessa, A software engineering method for the design of mixed reality systems. In The Engineering Of Mixed Reality Systems, pp.313-334, 2010.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00953692

C. Eastman and R. Sacks, Introducing a new methodology to develop the information delivery manual for AEC projects, CIB W78 2010, pp.16-18, 2010.

C. &. Eastman and Y. Jeong, Exchange Model and Exchange Object Concepts for Implementation of National BIM Standards, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, vol.24, issue.1, pp.25-34, 2010.
DOI : 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2010)24:1(25)

C. Ellis and J. Wainer, A conceptual model of groupware, Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work , CSCW '94, pp.79-88, 1994.
DOI : 10.1145/192844.192878

L. Eloranta, E. Kallio, . Bpmn, . Diagrams, C. Emig et al., A Notation Evaluation of Development of SOA-based software systems-an evolutionary programming approach, Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications and International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (AICT, 2006.

M. Endrei, Patterns: Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services, 2004.

Y. Engeström, Learning by Expanding. An Activity-theoretical approach to developmental research, 1987.

J. Favre, Towards a Basic Theory to Model Model Driven Engineering, Workshop on Software Model Engineering, 2004.

L. Favre and C. Pereira, Improving MDA-based Process Quality through Refactoring Patterns, Proc. of the 1st International Workshop on Software Patterns and Quality. Citeseer, 2007.

R. Fielding, Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures, 2000.

D. Frankel, The Zachman Framework and the OMG's Model Driven Architecture, Business Process, pp.1-14, 2003.

A. Front, D. Rieu, and J. Giraudin, Une vision sur les problématiques actuelles de la recherche en Systèmes d 'Information. sigma.imag.fr, p.27, 2009.

J. Gabay and D. Gabay, UML 2 Analyse et conception -Mise en oeuvre guidée avec études de cas, 2008.

B. Gifford and N. Enyedy, Activity centered design, Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning, CSCL '99, 1999.
DOI : 10.3115/1150240.1150262

W. Giraldo, A. Molina, and C. Collazos, A Model Based Approach for GUI Development in Groupware Systems, pp.324-339, 2008.
DOI : 10.1109/COOPIS.1998.706274

C. Godart, Implicit or explicit coordination of virtual teams in building design, Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research In Asia-CAADRIA'01, 2001.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00108078

J. Gordijn, H. Akkermans, and H. Van-vliet, Business modelling is not process modelling. Conceptual Modeling for E-Business and the Web, pp.40-51, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-45394-6_5

URL : http://www.cs.vu.nl/~hans/publications/ECOMO2000.pdf

K. Gottschalk, S. Graham, and H. Kreger, Introduction to Web services architecture, IBM Systems Journal, vol.41, issue.2, p.41, 2002.
DOI : 10.1147/sj.412.0170

S. Greenberg, Personalizable groupware: Accommodating individual roles and group differences, Proceedings of the second conference on European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp.17-32, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-011-3506-1_2

D. Greer and Y. Hamon, Agile Software Development, Software -Practice and experience, pp.943-944, 2011.
DOI : 10.1002/spe.975

S. Gregor, Building theory in the sciences of the artificial, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, DESRIST '09, 2009.
DOI : 10.1145/1555619.1555625

R. Grinter, J. Herbsleb, and D. Perry, The geography of coordination, Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work , GROUP '99, 1999.
DOI : 10.1145/320297.320333

J. Grudin, Computer-supported cooperative work: history and focus, Computer, vol.27, issue.5, pp.19-26, 1994.
DOI : 10.1109/2.291294

J. Grudin, Why CSCW applications fail: problems in the design and evaluationof organizational interfaces, Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, CSCW '88, pp.85-93, 1988.
DOI : 10.1145/62266.62273

A. Guerriero, La représentation de la confiance dans l'activité collective -Application à la coordination de l'activité de chantier de construction, 2009.

A. Guerriero, D. Zignale, and G. Halin, A Zoomable Location-Based Dashboard for Construction Management, CDVE2012, 2012.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-32609-7_29

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01027506

B. Göransson, M. Lif, and J. Gulliksen, Usability Design-Extending Rational Unified Process with a New Discipline In Interactive Systems: Design, Specification and Verification, 10th International Work-shop, DSV-IS 2003, pp.316-330, 2003.

S. Hanrot, Une évaluation de la qualité architecturale relative aux points de vue des acteurs, Cahiers RAMAU, vol.5, pp.111-126, 2005.

D. Hanser, Proposition d'un modèle d'auto-coordination en situation de conception, 2003.

H. He, What is service-oriented architecture. Publicação eletrônica em, pp.1-5, 2003.

F. Henri and K. Lundgren-cayrol, Apprentissage collaboratif à distance: pour comprendre et concevoir les environnements d'apprentissage virtuels, 2001.

W. Heuvel, Software service engineering: Tenets and challenges, PESOS'09, pp.26-33, 2009.

A. Hevner, Design Science in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly, vol.28, issue.1, pp.75-105, 2004.
DOI : 10.2307/25148625

J. Hietanen, IAI Official IFC Model View Definition Format, 2006.

G. Hodgson, Capitalism, Complexity, and Inequality, Journal of Economic Issues, vol.86, issue.2, pp.471-478, 2003.
DOI : 10.1257/jep.11.2.55

E. Huang and E. Mynatt, Secrets to success and fatal flaws: the design of large-display groupware, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.26, issue.1, pp.37-45, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/MCG.2006.21

S. Hussain, Mapping of SOA and RUP: DOA as Case Study, Journal of computing, vol.2, issue.1, pp.104-109, 2010.

M. Ibrahim and R. Krawczyk, The level of knowledge of CAD objects within the building information model. In Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture, pp.172-177, 2003.

D. Idoughi and C. Kolski, Vers un développement orienté services des applications interactives dans le domaine de la logistique, étude de cas, Workshop International IEEE Logistique et Transport, 2009.

M. Jackson and P. Zave, Deriving specifications from requirements, Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Software engineering , ICSE '95, pp.15-24, 1995.
DOI : 10.1145/225014.225016

H. Kaindl and R. Jezek, From Usage Scenarios to User Interface Elements in a Few Steps, Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces III, pp.91-102, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-010-0421-3_8

A. Kalnins, From requirements to code in a model driven way Advances in Databases and Information Systems, pp.161-168, 2010.

C. Kaner, J. Falk, and M. Katsumata, Personalized groupware service for collaborative communities, IADIS International Conference Applied Computing, pp.510-514, 1999.

E. Kavakli, Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Unifying Framework, Requirements Engineering, vol.6, issue.4, pp.237-251, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/PL00010362

T. Kohlborn, Identification and Analysis of Business and Software Services???A Consolidated Approach, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, vol.2, issue.1, pp.50-64, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/TSC.2009.6

F. Kohlmann and R. Alt, Business-driven service modeling-a methodological approach from the finance industry, Business Process and Services Computing (BPSC'07, pp.180-193, 2007.

P. Kroll and P. Kruchten, The rational unified process made easy: a practitioner's guide to the RUP, 2003.

P. Kruchten, What Is the Rational Unified Process?, p.11, 2001.

S. Kubicki, Assistance to building construction coordination ? towards a multi-view cooperative platform, pp.565-586, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00086665

S. Kubicki, Assister la coordination flexible de l'activité de construction de bâtiments. Une approche par les modèles pour la proposition d'outils de visualisation du contexte de coopération, 2006.

S. Kubicki, A. Guerriero, and P. Leclercq, Cooperative design studios in education Lessons learnt from two experiments, 13th Congress of Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics. From Modern to Digital: the Challenges of a Transition, 2009.

S. Kubicki and E. Dubois, Towards a Sustainable Services Innovation in the Construction Sector Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp.319-333, 2009.

S. Kubicki, A. Guerriero, and L. Johannsen, A service-based innovation process for improving cooperative practices in AEC, ITcon Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction XX, pp.1-21, 2009.

I. Kurtev, . Bézivin, and M. Ak?it, Technological spaces: An initial appraisal, p.6, 2002.

K. Kuutti, Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction, pp.9-22, 1996.

T. Kvan, Collaborative design: what is it?, Automation in Construction, vol.9, issue.4, pp.409-415, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0926-5805(99)00025-4

A. Laaroussi, Assister la conduite de la conception en architecture: vers un système d'information orienté pilotage des processus, 2007.

A. Lamsweerde and . Van, Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour, Proceedings Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, 2001.
DOI : 10.1109/ISRE.2001.948567

A. Lamsweerde and . Van, Goal-oriented requirements engineering: from system objectives to UML models to precise software specifications, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings., pp.1-81, 2003.
DOI : 10.1109/ICSE.2003.1201266

A. Lapouchnian, Goal-oriented requirements engineering: An overview of the current research, 2005.

Y. Laurillau, Conception et réalisation logicielles pour les collecticiels centrées sur l'activité de groupe: le modèle et la plate-forme Clover, 2002.

Y. Laurillau and L. Nigay, Clover architecture for groupware, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work , CSCW '02, p.236, 2002.
DOI : 10.1145/587078.587112

A. Leontiev, Activity, consciousness, and personality, 1978.

B. List, An evaluation of conceptual business process modelling languages, Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing , SAC '06, 2006.
DOI : 10.1145/1141277.1141633

G. Loniewski, A. Armesto, and E. Insfran, Incorporating Model-Driven Techniques into Requirements Engineering for the Service-Oriented Development Process, Engineering Methods in the Service-Oriented Context. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, pp.102-107, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-19997-4_11

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01562879

P. Loucopoulos and V. Karakostas, System Requirements Engineering, 1995.

C. Lovelock and J. Wirtz, Services marketing, 1981.

S. Lu and C. Paris, Towards the automatic generation of task models. Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction, 1999.

V. Lucquiaud, Proposition d'un noyau et d'une structure pour les mod??les de t??ches orient??s utilisateurs, Proceedings of the 17th conference on 17??me Conf??rence Francophone sur l'Interaction Homme-Machine , IHM 2005, pp.83-90, 2005.
DOI : 10.1145/1148550.1148561

L. S. Lê, A. Ghose, and E. Morrison, Definition of a description language for business service decomposition, Proceedings of First International Conference on Exploring Services Sciences (IESS 1.0), pp.96-110, 2010.

C. M. Mackenzie, Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0, Architecture, pp.1-31, 2006.

P. P. Maglio and J. Spohrer, Fundamentals of service science, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol.68, issue.1, pp.18-20, 2007.
DOI : 10.4337/9781781950203

T. W. Malone and K. Crowston, The interdisciplinary study of coordination, ACM Computing Surveys, vol.26, issue.1, pp.87-119, 1994.
DOI : 10.1145/174666.174668

S. March, Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision support systems, 1995.

O. Marjanovic, Collaborative practice-oriented business processes Creating a new case for business process management and CSCW synergy, 2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007), pp.448-455, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553874

G. Masserey and K. Samaan, Implémentation du modèle AMF, IHM " 06 Proceedings of the 18th International Conferenceof the Association Francophone d " Interaction Homme- Machine, 2006.

H. Mintzberg, Le management: voyage au centre des organisations, 1989.

S. Misra and V. Kumar, Goal-oriented or scenario-based requirements engineering technique -what should a practitioner select? Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, pp.2288-2292, 2005.

G. Mori, F. Paterno, and C. Santoro, CTTE: support for developing and analyzing task models for interactive system design, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.28, issue.8, pp.797-813, 2002.
DOI : 10.1109/TSE.2002.1027801

P. Nitithamyong and M. Skibniewski, Key success/failure factors and their impacts on system performance of web-based project management systems in construction. ITcon, pp.39-59, 2007.

O. Noran, Business modelling: UML vs. IDEF. School of CIT, Griffith University Available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Business+Modelling+:+U ML+vs, p.0, 2000.

D. Norman, User-centred System Design: New Directions in Human-Computer Interaction, 1986.

B. Nuseibeh and S. Easterbrook, Requirements engineering, Proceedings of the conference on The future of Software engineering , ICSE '00, pp.35-46, 2000.
DOI : 10.1145/336512.336523

P. Oaks, T. Hofstede, A. H. Edmond, and D. , Capabilities: Describing What Services Can Do, Service-Oriented Computing-ICSOC 2003, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-24593-3_1

URL : http://www.csd.uoc.gr/~hy565/newpage/docs/pdfs/papers/Capabilities - Describing what Services Can Do.pdf

G. Olsen, Personas creation and usage toolkit, 2004.

J. Olson, Groupware in the wild, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work , CSCW '96, pp.419-427, 1996.
DOI : 10.1145/240080.240353

A. Osterwalder, The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach, 2004.

O. Farrell and P. , An interaction model of business service production and consumption, British Journal of Management, 1991.

G. O-'regan, Computer Programming Languages, A Brief History of Computing, 2008.

O. Sullivan and J. J. , Towards a precise understanding of service properties, 2006.

F. Paetsch, . Eberlein, and F. Maurer, Requirements engineering and agile software development. WET ICE, Proceedings. Twelfth IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pp.308-313, 2003.
DOI : 10.1109/enabl.2003.1231428

URL : http://sern.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~milos/papers/2003/DA_Frauke.pdf

M. P. Papazoglou and D. Georgakopoulos, Service-oriented computing, Communications of the ACM, vol.46, issue.10, pp.25-28, 2003.

M. P. Papazoglou, W. Heuvel, and . Van-den, Service-oriented design and development methodology, International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology, vol.2, issue.4, p.412, 2006.
DOI : 10.1504/IJWET.2006.010423

F. Paterno, Towards a UML for interactive systems Engineering for human-computer interaction, pp.7-18, 2001.

F. Paternò, C. Mancini, and S. Meniconi, ConcurTaskTrees: A Diagrammatic Notation for Specifying Task Models, Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 Interantional Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Citeseer, pp.362-369, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/978-0-387-35175-9_58

K. Peffers, A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol.24, issue.3, pp.45-77, 2007.
DOI : 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302

D. Peixoto, V. Batista, and A. Atayde, A comparison of bpmn and uml 2.0 activity diagrams, VII Simposio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software, 2008.

C. Pereira, A method to define an Enterprise Architecture using the Zachman Framework, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Applied computing , SAC '04, 2004.
DOI : 10.1145/967900.968175

D. Pinelle and C. Gutwin, A Groupware Design Framework for Loosely Coupled Workgroups, ECSCW 2005, pp.65-82, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_4

A. Piquet, Guide pratique du travail collaboratif: Théories , méthodes et outils au service de la collaboration, 2009.

C. Pribeanu, An Approach to Task Modeling for User Interface Design, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol.5, pp.5-8, 2005.

J. Pruitt and J. Grudin, Personas, Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences , DUX '03, 2003.
DOI : 10.1145/997078.997089

L. Pérochon, D. Quartel, R. Dijkman, and M. Van-sinderen, Ingénierie dirigée par les modèles Model Driven Architecture Methodological support for service-oriented design with ISDL, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Service oriented computing -ICSOC '04, 2004.

G. Rameau, E. Samyn, . Le, . Assiste, and . Ordinateur, TCAO) Exemple d'une solution technologique avec X-TEK, 23 ème congrés de l'AIPU. Monastir, pp.1-22, 2006.

E. Ramollari and D. Dranidis, A survey of service oriented development methodologies, Workshop on Service Oriented, pp.75-80, 2007.

M. Rosemann, Business Service Management. Service Management, p.16, 2009.

S. Saffin and P. Leclercq, Studio digital collaboratif, un environnement multimodal de conception collaborative a distance: application et perspectives, IHM'10 -Atelier Collecticiels, pp.16-18, 2010.

S. Safin, S. Kubicki, and D. Hanser, Enseigner la co-conception à distance: Retour sur cinq années d'expérience, SCAN12 -Complexité (s) des modèles de l'architecture numérique. Presses Universitaires de Nancy, 2012.

D. Salber, De l'observabilité et de l'honnèteté: le cas du controle d'accès dans la Communication Homme-Homme Médiatisée, IHM'95, 1995.

C. Salinesi, Authoring Use Cases. Scenarios and Use Cases, Stories through the System Life-Cycle, 2004.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00706438

T. Salvador, J. Scholtz, and J. Larson, The Denver model for groupware design, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, vol.28, issue.1, pp.52-58, 1996.
DOI : 10.1145/249170.249185

K. Sandkuhl, Supporting Collaborative Engineering with Information Supply Patterns, 2010 18th Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing, pp.375-384, 2010.
DOI : 10.1109/PDP.2010.88

L. Santos, J. Lopes, and A. Leitao, Collaborative Digital Design -When the architect meets the software engineer, pp.87-97, 2012.

M. Satyanarayanan, Fundamental challenges in mobile computing, Proceedings of the fifteenth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing -PODC '96, 1996.

K. Saïkali, Flexibilité des Workflows par l'approche objet: 2FLOW, un framework pour Workflows flexibles, 2001.

K. Schmidt and C. Simone, Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol.1, issue.1, pp.155-200, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/S0923-8433(96)80025-6

K. Schmidt and I. Wagner, Ordering Systems: Coordinative Practices and Artifacts in Architectural Design and Planning, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol.19, issue.8, pp.5-6349, 2004.
DOI : 10.1215/9780822383000

K. Schwaber, J. Sutherland, &. Ken, and M. Beedle, The scrum guide Schwaber, Agile Software Development with Scrum, 2001.

A. Seffah, C. Kolski, and D. Idoughi, Persona comme outil de design de services interactifs, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine, IHM '09, pp.13-16, 2009.
DOI : 10.1145/1629826.1629880

M. &. Sierhuis and W. Clancey, Modeling and simulating practices, a work method for work systems design, IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.17, issue.5, pp.32-41, 2002.
DOI : 10.1109/MIS.2002.1039830

H. A. Simon, The sciences of artificial, 2004.

M. Sohlenkamp, W. Prinz, and L. Fuchs, PoliawaC: design and evaluation of an awareness-enhanced groupware client, AI & Society, vol.19, issue.2, pp.31-47, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01206127

I. Sommerville, Integrated requirements engineering: A tutorial. Software, IEEE, vol.22, issue.1, pp.16-23, 2005.

I. Sommerville, J. Sottet, G. Calvary, and J. Favre, Introduction to Software Engineering Ingénierie de l'Interaction Homme-Machine Dirigée, 1996.

E. Soulier and M. Lewkowicz, Simulation des pratiques collaboratives pour la conception des SI bas??s sur les processus m??tiers, Revue des Sciences et Technologies de ll'Information, pp.73-94, 2006.
DOI : 10.3166/isi.11.3.73-94

E. Soulier, M. Lewkowicz, and N. Corouge, Gestion des processus métier et travail collaboratif, p.25, 2007.

L. Suchman, Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives), 1987.

A. Sutcliffe, Applying small group theory to analysis and design of CSCW systems, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, pp.1-6, 2005.

A. Sutcliffe, Requirements Engineering from an HCI Perspective, Requirements Engineering Activities and Processes, pp.1-39, 2007.

A. Sutcliffe, Scenario-based requirements engineering, Journal of Lightwave Technology, pp.320-329, 2003.
DOI : 10.1109/ICRE.2003.1232776

T. Bernard and F. , Travail coopératif synchrone assisté par ordinateur : Approche AMF- C, 1997.

M. Tazari, M. Grimm, and M. Finke, Modelling user context, Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2003.

H. Tellioglu, Coordination design, 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, Volume 1 (AINA'06), pp.425-432, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/AINA.2006.135

D. Thevenin, Adaptation en Interaction Homme-Machine : le cas de la Plasticité, 2001.

J. Touzi, A model-driven approach for collaborative service-oriented architecture design, International Journal of Production Economics, vol.121, issue.1, pp.5-20, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.09.019

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01207433

V. Vaishnavi and W. Kuechler, Design science research methods and patterns: innovating information and communication technology, 2007.
DOI : 10.1201/9781420059335

J. &. Vanderdonckt and F. Bodart, Encapsulating knowledge for intelligent automatic interaction objects selection, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems , CHI '93, 1993.
DOI : 10.1145/169059.169340

G. Veer and . Van-der, Task based groupware design: putting theory into practice, Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp.326-337, 2000.

G. Veer and . Van-der, The Design of Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware Systems, 1996.

C. Vissers, M. Lankhorst, and R. Slagter, Reference Models for Advanced E-Services, Digital Communities in A Networked Society, pp.369-393, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/1-4020-7907-9_29

S. White, . Bpmn, and R. Wieringa, Introduction A survey of structured and object-oriented software specification methods and techniques, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), vol.30, issue.4, p.69, 1998.

A. Williams, User-centered design, activity-centered design, and goal-directed design, Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on Design of communication, SIGDOC '09, pp.1-8, 2009.
DOI : 10.1145/1621995.1621997

M. Winckler, P. Palanque, and . Cmds, Tasks and scenario-based evaluation of information visualization techniques, Proceedings of the 3rd annual conference on Task models and diagrams , TAMODIA '04, pp.165-172, 2004.
DOI : 10.1145/1045446.1045475

R. Yamin and D. Harmelink, Comparison of Linear Scheduling Model (LSM) and Critical Path Method (CPM), Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol.127, issue.5, pp.374-381, 2001.
DOI : 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:5(374)

R. T. Yeh and P. Zave, Specifying software requirements, Proceedings of the IEEE, pp.1077-1085, 1980.
DOI : 10.1109/PROC.1980.11806

C. Yin, Samcco: un Système d'Apprentissage Mobile Contextuel et Collaboratif dans des Situations Professionnelles, 2010.

J. Zachman, A framework for information systems architecture, IBM Systems Journal, vol.26, issue.3, pp.276-292, 1987.
DOI : 10.1147/sj.263.0276

J. Zhang, Development and Implementation of an Industry Foundation Classes-Based Graphic Information Model for Virtual Construction, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol.27, issue.7, 2012.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00739.x

Z. Zhang, R. Liu, and H. Yang, Service identification and packaging in service oriented reengineering, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Management, pp.219-226, 2005.

D. Zignale, S. Kubicki, and S. Ramel, A Model-Based Method for the Design of Services in Collaborative Business Environments, Proceedings of IESS 1.1: Second International Conference on Exploring Services Sciences, p.15, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/SEAA.2008.35

D. Zignale, S. Kubicki, and G. Halin, Business practices analysis for the adaptation of IT services to AEC projects. Case study of design assessment related practices, CIB w078- w102 2011, 2011.

O. Zimmermann, Elements of service-oriented analysis and design, 2004.

F. De-representation-d-'un, . Concept, . En, . De, . Schema-d-'une et al., 61 FIGURE 22 62 FIGURE 23 63 FIGURE 25 65 FIGURE 27, 83 FIGURE 40. ILLUSTRATION DES TRANSFORMATIONS ENTRE MODELES DANS LE CAS D'ETUDE DE (SOTTET ET AL. 2005), pp.81-119, 2002.

F. Points-d-'entree, L. De, . Conception, . Au, . De-l-'evolution et al., 91 FIGURE 45 92 FIGURE 46 ROLES 93 FIGURE 47 ROLES 94 FIGURE 48 CORRELATION 96 FIGURE 49 99 FIGURE 51, 107 FIGURE 56. LE MODELE D'ARCHITECTURE CO-MVC POUR DECRIRE UN SERVICE COLLABORATIF ............ 108 FIGURE 57. VERS UN NOUVEAU CHANGEMENT DE PARADIGME DANS LA CONCEPTION LOGICIELLE .......... 112 FIGURE 58, pp.116-59, 2003.

F. De-l-'artefact, D. Dispositif, . Du, C. Dans, . Relations et al., 117 FIGURE 62 REPRESENTATION 117 FIGURE 63, 118 FIGURE 66. EXEMPLE DE REPRESENTATION DE TROIS PROCESSUS ALTERNATIFS (ENCADRES COLORES) AVEC

V. Operations, . Du-concept-d-'espace, and T. De, 131 FIGURE 74 132 FIGURE 76 CONSTRUCTION 135 FIGURE 77 PARTIES 141 FIGURE 78 142 FIGURE 79, 168 FIGURE 91. INSTANCIATION DU MMPM PAR UN DIAGRAMME D'ACTIVITES UML .................................... 170 FIGURE 92. INTERFACE DE L'EDITEUR GMF D'ARBRES HIERARCHIQUES POUR LA MODELISATION DES PRATIQUES (EXEMPLE), p.171, 2006.

L. De-l-'analyse, C. Metier, R. De, . Des, . Differents et al., 172 FIGURE 94 174 FIGURE 95 175 FIGURE 96 RELATION 179 FIGURE 97 181 FIGURE 98 184 FIGURE 100 186 FIGURE 101, 189 FIGURE 105, 0192.

M. De-cas-d-'utilisation and D. Adaptes, 193 FIGURE 109EXIGENCES 194 FIGURE 110, CARACTERISATION DU SERVICE ICT ET SES COMPOSANTS, pp.202-114

D. De, . Ajoutee, . Une, . Dans, . Diagramme et al., 205 FIGURE 116 RAPPEL : DIAGRAMME D'INTERACTION DECOMPOSANT L'INTENTION « UPLOAD MULTIPLE FILES» 207 FIGURE 117

M. Un, S. Implemente-210, and F. Fonction, 209 FIGURE 119 ILLUSTRATION 213 FIGURE 121, pp.219-126

S. Les, 224 FIGURE 128 225 FIGURE 129 RAPPEL : RELATION, 229 FIGURE 132. « CONTEXTUAL USE CASE » DU SERVICE D'UPLOAD, pp.231-133

T. 9. Resume, . Des, C. De, . Basee, . Le et al., 155 TABLEAU 12 157 TABLEAU 13 157 TABLEAU 14 158 TABLEAU 15 158 TABLEAU 16 159 TABLEAU 17 160 TABLEAU 19, ELEMENTS ELEMENTS ELEMENTS ELEMENTS ELEMENTS ELEMENTS ELEMENTS ELEMENTS ELEMENTS ELEMENTS ELEMENTS, vol.160, issue.20, pp.161-183

. Le-diagramme-définit, définir ici schématise une Pratique Collective (Collective Practice, CP) décomposée en une ou plusieurs Pratiques Individuelles (Individual Practices, IP) adoptées par le client ou dans un cas similaire

P. Légende, La pratique collective (Collective Practice ? CP) est définie par : -Un nom (name) décrivant en quelques mots en quoi elle consiste -Une famille (family) choisie parmi un ensemble définit

. La-pratique-individuelle, Individual Practice ? IP) est définie par : -Un nom (name) décrivant en quelques mots en quoi elle consiste -Une description ayant pour but d'expliquer plus précisément la nature de la pratique

-. Production, Mettre à jour (Update), Effacer (Delete)), Exécuter (Execute, Modifier (Modify) Lier (Link), Inclure(Include) -« Diffusion » (Availability) : Partager (Share), Annuler partage

U. Acteur, une pratique individuelle ou simplement impliqué (c'est à dire concerné par l'opération d'un autre acteur) Dans tout les cas il est définit par : -Un rôle organisationnel (organizational role) : Concepteur (designer), Maître d'ouvrage (owner autre (other) -Un métier (job) : architecte (architect), ingénieur structure/ santé/sécurité (structure, safety, Expert, Constructeur (constructor), Coordinateur (coordinator), Administration, Conseiller (advisor) urbaniste (urbaniste), Maçon (Mason), Electricien (Electrician), Charpentier (Carpenter), autre (other)?

. Le-contexte-de-l, acteur rappelle le métier de l'acteur et définit son rôle opérationnel (operationnal role), c.à.d. son rôle vis-à-vis du système (ex. administrateur, utilisateur?)

. Le, hardware) définit le support physique utilisé à savoir : -le type d'appareil (device) : ordinateur personnel (computer), ordinateur portable (laptop), smartphone (smartphone), p.tablette tactile

-. Système, exploitation (OS) : Windows, macOS, linux, android, iOS, WindowsPhone? -Le type de dispositif d'interaction (interaction device) : clavier (keyboard) + souris (mouse), pavé tactile (touchpad), écran tactile (touchscreen)?

L. Tâches and . Le-contenu, Chaque intention utilisateur sera décomposée pour former un arbre de tâches comprenant plusieurs niveaux d'abstraction. La tâche abtsraite décrit l'interaction de manière générale et indépendante de la technologie. Elle est définie par un nom et un type. Deux types de tâches concrètes sont possibles : la tâche d'interaction (action physique de l'utilisateur sur le système) et la tâche de perception

L. Diagrammes-de-cette-partie, utilisation d'un service ICT par un client, l'architecture de ce service (chaque composant ayant un stéréotype « modèle privé », « modèle partagé », « vue » ou « contrôleur » et les flux de données (inputs du client vers la vue, outputs de la vue vers le client et actions entre les composants du service) Ces diagrammes prennent en compte des scénarios idéaux