V. Kiselev, Gas Chromatography Institute of Petroleum, Chromatographia, vol.31, issue.434, 1964.

J. Kamlet, J. L. Abboud, and R. W. Taft, The solvatochromic comparison method. 6. The .pi.* scale of solvent polarities, Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol.99, issue.18, p.6027, 1977.
DOI : 10.1021/ja00460a031

. Payot, Thèse de l, 2000.

M. Rodriguez-reinoso, M. T. Molina-sabio, T. Ra, K. Iiyrnaya, T. Nishikawa et al., Gor:zalez, Langmuir 13,2354,lgg7, J. Phys. Chem. gg, vol.135802, 1997.

A. Muller, L. F. Rull, L. F. Vega, and K. E. Gubbins, Adsorption of Water on Activated Carbons:?? A Molecular Simulation Study, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol.100, issue.4, p.1189, 1996.
DOI : 10.1021/jp952233w

J. G. "-gg, K. S. Sing-cossarutto, C. Vagner, G. Finqueneisel, J. V. Weber et al., Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity, Zod d, Applied Surface Science, vol.77207, 1982.

J. M. Carrott, M. B. Kebby, R. A. Roberts, K. S. , V. /. Sing et al., Characterisation of Porous Solids, p.685

I. F. Payot, Etude du comportement en adsorption d'un mélange de composés organiques volatils sur charbon actif en présence ou non de vapeur d'eau, Thèse de doctorat UHP-Nancy I, 2000.

F. Rodriguez-reinoso, M. Molina-sabio, and M. A. Munecas, Effect of microporosity and oxygen surface groups of activated carbon in the adsorption of molecules of different polarity, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol.96, issue.6, pp.2707-2709
DOI : 10.1021/j100185a056

E. M. Jasienko-halat, T. Siemieniewska-e, A. J. Fletcher, and K. M. Thomas, Catalysis and adsorption in fuel processing and environmental protection, Kudowa, 333, Langmuir J. Phys. Chem. B, vol.166253, issue.103, 1999.

Y. El-sayed and T. J. Bandosz, A Study of Acetaldehyde Adsorption on Activated Carbons, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol.242, issue.1, p.44, 2001.
DOI : 10.1006/jcis.2001.7772

K. Nieszporek and W. Rudzinski, Colloids and Surfaces A 196, 2002.

J. Sott and S. Satyapal, Extented Abstracts and Program of the 24th Biennal Conference on Carbon, p.652, 1999.

. La-comparaison-des-cinétiques-d, adsorption obtenues selon les deux modes d'acquisition monfre que pour I'eau et le méthanol les constantes de vitesse d'adsorption sont plus faibles en mode dynamique Ainsi aux faibles concentrations relatives, cette diftrence peut aller jusqu'à 40 fois pour I'adsorption de la molécule d'eau sur la fibre ex-PAN. En augmentant le gradient de concentration, le rapport statique/dynamique diminue. Cet effet cinétique peut s'expliquer en partie par le libre parcours moyen 1,. Celui-ci diminue par augmentation de la pression en mode statique mais reste constant en mode dynamique

G. Zgrablich, Surface diffrrsion of adsorbates on heterogeneous substrates, Equilibria and Dynamics of gas Adsorption on Heterogeneous Solid Strrfaces, 1997.

H. Mugge, T. Bosch, and C. Reith, Measuring and modelling gas adsorption kinetics in single porous particles, Chemical Engineering Science, vol.56, issue.18, p.5351, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00238-X

D. Do, H. D. Do, and I. Prasetyo, Constant molar flow semi-batch adsorber as a tool to study adsorption kinetics of pure gases and vapours, Chemical Engineering Science, vol.55, issue.9, p.1717, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00428-5

8. Prasetyo and D. D. Do, Adsorption rate of methane and carbon dioxide on activated carbon by the semi-batch constant molar flow rate method, Chemical Engineering Science, vol.53, issue.19, p.3459, 1998.
DOI : 10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00146-8

J. Ct and *. , The mathernatics of diffirsion, 1975.

E. Glueckauf and J. I. Coates, Theory of chromatography -Pt IV, J. Chem. Soc. Carbon, vol.310, issue.5, pp.33-1405, 1947.

T. A. Braymer, C. G. Coe, T. S. Farris, T. R. Gaffirey, J. M. Schork et al., Granular carbon molecular sieves, Carbon, vol.32, issue.3, p.445, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/0008-6223(94)90165-1