Interpreting canopy development and physiology using a European phenology camera network at flux sites - Université de Lorraine
Journal Articles Biogeosciences Year : 2015

Interpreting canopy development and physiology using a European phenology camera network at flux sites

1 UMR ISPA - Interactions Sol Plante Atmosphère
2 ARPA - Aosta Valley Regional Environmental Protection Agency
3 Edin. - University of Edinburgh
4 MPI-BGC - Max-Planck-Institut für Biogeochemie
5 Alice Holt Lodge
6 Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech [Gembloux]
7 EURAC - European Academy of Bozen-Bolzano
8 Universität Innsbruck [Innsbruck]
9 ETH Zürich - Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology [Zürich]
10 Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterraneo
11 Helsingin yliopisto = Helsingfors universitet = University of Helsinki
12 Hokkaido University [Sapporo, Japan]
13 Georg-August-University = Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
14 Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut = Thünen Institute
15 Risø DTU - Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy
16 Universiteit Antwerpen = University of Antwerpen [Antwerpen]
17 Università degli studi della Tuscia [Viterbo]
18 DEPT EFPA - Département Ecologie des Forêts, Prairies et milieux Aquatiques
19 TU Dresden - Technische Universität Dresden = Dresden University of Technology
20 CEFE - Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive
21 Skane University Hospital [Lund]
22 UKCEH - Centre for Ecology and Hydrology
23 EEF - Ecologie et Ecophysiologie Forestières [devient SILVA en 2018]
24 BVME - Biologie végétale et microbiologie environnementale - UMR7265
25 Weizmann Institute of Science [Rehovot, Israël]
26 Universität zu Köln = University of Cologne
27 Department of Plant Sciences (Cambridge, UK)
L. Wingate
  • Function : Correspondent author
J. Ogée
M. Wilkinson
  • Function : Author
J. Morison
  • Function : Author
C. George
M. Sprintsin
  • Function : Author
J. Grace
  • Function : Author

Abstract

Plant phenological development is orchestrated through subtle changes in photoperiod, temperature, soil moisture and nutrient availability. Presently, the exact timing of plant development stages and their response to climate and management practices are crudely represented in land surface models. As visual observations of phenology are laborious, there is a need to supplement long-term observations with automated techniques such as those provided by digital repeat photography at high temporal and spatial resolution. We present the first synthesis from a growing observational network of digital cameras installed on towers across Europe above deciduous and evergreen forests, grasslands and croplands, where vegetation and atmosphere CO2 fluxes are measured continuously. Using colour indices from digital images and using piecewise regression analysis of time series, we explored whether key changes in canopy phenology could be detected automatically across different land use types in the network. The piecewise regression approach could capture the start and end of the growing season, in addition to identifying striking changes in colour signals caused by flowering and management practices such as mowing. Exploring the dates of green-up and senescence of deciduous forests extracted by the piecewise regression approach against dates estimated from visual observations, we found that these phenological events could be detected adequately (RMSE < 8 and 11 days for leaf out and leaf fall, respectively). We also investigated whether the seasonal patterns of red, green and blue colour fractions derived from digital images could be modelled mechanistically using the PROSAIL model parameterised with information of seasonal changes in canopy leaf area and leaf chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations. From a model sensitivity analysis we found that variations in colour fractions, and in particular the late spring 'green hump' observed repeatedly in deciduous broadleaf canopies across the network, are essentially dominated by changes in the respective pigment concentrations. Using the model we were able to explain why this spring maximum in green signal is often observed out of phase with the maximum period of canopy photosynthesis in ecosystems across Europe. Coupling such quasi-continuous digital records of canopy colours with co-located CO2 flux measurements will improve our understanding of how changes in growing season length are likely to shape the capacity of European ecosystems to sequester CO2 in the future.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
2015_Wingate_Biogeosciences_1.pdf (4.02 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Dates and versions

hal-01557316 , version 1 (28-05-2020)

Identifiers

Cite

L. Wingate, J. Ogée, E. Cremonese, G. Filippa, T. Mizunuma, et al.. Interpreting canopy development and physiology using a European phenology camera network at flux sites. Biogeosciences, 2015, 12 (20), pp.5995 - 6015. ⟨10.5194/bg-12-5995-2015⟩. ⟨hal-01557316⟩
288 View
175 Download

Altmetric

Share

More