Dialogical history of a logical fallacy spontaneously produced during a predictive medicine consultation. Role of the causal connective Puisque in a discussion

Abstract : This article presents the dialogical history of the production and the contesting of logical fallacies in a natural dialogue stemming from a Genetic Counseling for Predictive Testing consultation. These logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that are well-known in psychology and rhetoric: « affirming the consequent » and « negating the antecedent ». The authors construct a formal model of this dialogue which explains why the fallacy appears and why corrective attempts ultimately fail. They show that the causal connective puisque is an essential operator of the studied dialogue.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Journal of Pragmatics, Elsevier, 2014, 61, pp.120 - 141. 〈10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.018〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-01585357
Contributeur : Interpsy Ul <>
Soumis le : lundi 11 septembre 2017 - 15:16:48
Dernière modification le : lundi 23 avril 2018 - 15:53:43

Identifiants

Citation

Martine Batt, Alain Trognon, Thérèse Rivasseau Jonveaux, Denis Vernant, Philippe Jonveaux. Dialogical history of a logical fallacy spontaneously produced during a predictive medicine consultation. Role of the causal connective Puisque in a discussion. Journal of Pragmatics, Elsevier, 2014, 61, pp.120 - 141. 〈10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.018〉. 〈hal-01585357〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

53