How to routinely collect data on patient-reported outcome and experience measures in renal registries in Europe: an expert consensus meeting

Kate Breckenridge 1 Hillary Bekker 2 Elizabeth Gibbons 3 Sabine van der Veer 4, 5 Denise Abbott 6 Serge Briançon 7, 8 Ron Cullen 1 Liliana Garneata 9 Kitty Jager 10, 11 Kjersti Lønning 12 Wendy Metcalfe 13, 14 Rachael Morton 15, 3 Fliss Murtagh 16 Karl Prutz 17, 18 Susan Robertson 19 Ivan Rychlik 20 Steffan Schon 17, 21 Linda Sharp 22 Elodie Speyer 23, 8 Francesca Tentori 24 Fergus Caskey 1
Abstract : Despite the potential for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and experience measures (PREMs) to enhance understanding of patient experiences and outcomes they have not, to date, been widely incorporated into renal registry datasets. This report summarizes the main points learned from an ERA-EDTA QUEST-funded consensus meeting on how to routinely collect PROMs and PREMs in renal registries in Europe. In preparation for the meeting, we surveyed all European renal registries to establish current or planned efforts to collect PROMs/PREMs. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Publications reporting barriers and/or facilitators to PROMs/PREMs collection by registries were identified and a narrative synthesis undertaken. A group of renal registry representatives, PROMs/PREMs experts and patient representatives then met to (i) share any experience renal registries in Europe have in this area; (ii) establish how patient-reported data might be collected by understanding how registries currently collect routine data and how patient-reported data is collected in other settings; (iii) harmonize the future collection of patient-reported data by renal registries in Europe by agreeing upon preferred instruments and (iv) to identify the barriers to routine collection of patient-reported data in renal registries in Europe. In total, 23 of the 45 European renal registries responded to the survey. Two reported experience in collecting PROMs and three stated that they were actively exploring ways to do so. The systematic review identified 157 potentially relevant articles of which 9 met the inclusion criteria and were analysed for barriers and facilitators to routine PROM/PREM collection. Thirteen themes were identified and mapped to a three-stage framework around establishing the need, setting up and maintaining the routine collection of PROMs/PREMs. At the consensus meeting some PROMs instruments were agreed for routine renal registry collection (the generic SF-12, the disease-specific KDQOL™-36 and EQ-5D-5L to be able to derive quality-adjusted life years), but further work was felt to be needed before recommending PREMs. Routinely collecting PROMs and PREMs in renal registries is important if we are to better understand what matters to patients but it is likely to be challenging; close international collaboration will be beneficial.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-01813775
Contributor : Apemac Ul <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, June 12, 2018 - 3:47:53 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, August 7, 2019 - 2:44:06 PM

Links full text

Identifiers

Citation

Kate Breckenridge, Hillary Bekker, Elizabeth Gibbons, Sabine van der Veer, Denise Abbott, et al.. How to routinely collect data on patient-reported outcome and experience measures in renal registries in Europe: an expert consensus meeting. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2015, 30 (10), pp.1605 - 1614. ⟨10.1093/ndt/gfv209⟩. ⟨hal-01813775⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

27