Natural versus artificial herd immunity: Is vaccine research investment always optimal? - Université de Lorraine
Article Dans Une Revue Research in Economics Année : 2024

Natural versus artificial herd immunity: Is vaccine research investment always optimal?

Résumé

Under the threat of a rapid expanding virus like the 2020 COVID-19, policy-makers need to decide relatively fast whether and under which conditions to invest in a vaccine, and eventually adopt other protective measures like social distancing or lockdowns, or to wait for natural herd immunity. Taking into account that vaccines take time to be fully developed and effective, this paper considers a unified framework at the crossroad between economics and epidemiology to study optimal public spending in medical research to obtain a vaccine against an infectious disease evolving according to a SIR dynamics. We prove that developed economies always invest in the search of a vaccine. The more individuals care about consumption, the more they actually reduce their current consumption and the more they invest in the vaccine research program to recover their consumption potential at the earliest. Our model would only recommend economies with very poor technology to restrain from investment and wait for herd immunity.
Fichier non déposé

Dates et versions

halshs-04805635 , version 1 (26-11-2024)

Identifiants

Citer

Stefano Bosi, Carmen Camacho, David Desmarchelier. Natural versus artificial herd immunity: Is vaccine research investment always optimal?. Research in Economics, 2024, 78 (4), ⟨10.1016/j.rie.2024.100982⟩. ⟨halshs-04805635⟩
65 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More