Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation

La mise en mouvement des poursuites en procédures pénales française et thailandaise comparées

Abstract : If the bringing of criminal proceedings is not to be left in the hands of the private individual, the state must decide how it should intervene to ensure that the interests of society are protected and the laws passed by the legislature are enforced in the courts. Where there is an independent judiciary, the intervention of the state is personified by the public prosecutor. The powers given to him and the restrictions binding him frequently indicate where the balance lies between the state and the individual. A comparison of the Thai and French openings of the prosecution is of interest as an illustration of the attitudes of the respective states to the private citizen. It is however of greater practical value to compare the role of the public prosecutor as an essential figure in the administration of the two countries which share a common legal heritage subsequently developed independently.
Document type :
Theses
File URL :
http://docnum.univ-lorraine.fr/prive/BUD_T_1993_0003_RATHAMARIT.pdf
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/tel-01777045
Contributor : Administrateur Du Ccsd <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, April 24, 2018 - 4:09:54 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - 1:32:28 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : tel-01777045, version 1

Collections

Citation

Udom Rathamarit. La mise en mouvement des poursuites en procédures pénales française et thailandaise comparées. Droit. Université Nancy 2, 1993. Français. ⟨NNT : 1993NAN20005⟩. ⟨tel-01777045⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

3