Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Narratives of the Fake News Debate in France

Abstract : The objective of this article is to identify the topical repertoires, the underlying schemas that structure the fake news debate. Attention is focused on the mainstream French press, from the election of Donald Trump to the presidency of the United States on November 8, 2016, until his inauguration on January 20, 2017. The narratives elaborated in and by the French media regarding the dysfunctions of the contemporary information landscape indicate a utopian vision of the role of journalists and reproduce the linear information model. The impact of this doxa is threefold. First, it forwards a certain vision of journalism, based on fact-checking, naively considered to be the solution to the post-truth problem. Journalists are the main victims and at the same time the main perpetrators of this perception. Second, on an epistemological level, it brings back into the agenda the long-ago abandoned concept of "masses". Finally, from a political standpoint, the rhetoric on media's superpower is far from promoting the democratic enhancement of societies. By blaming the dysfunctions of social media for the flaws of the information environment, public actors tend to forget to take thorough interest in the reasons that lead people to fall prey to fake news. For more informations about the copyright protection, see :
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Rudy Hahusseau Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Tuesday, November 27, 2018 - 9:56:33 AM
Last modification on : Tuesday, May 3, 2022 - 2:06:06 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Thursday, February 28, 2019 - 1:11:07 PM


Publisher files allowed on an open archive





Angeliki Monnier. Narratives of the Fake News Debate in France. The IAFOR journal of arts & humanities, International Academic Forum, 2018, 5 (2), pp.3-22. ⟨10.22492/ijah.5.2.01⟩. ⟨hal-01935819⟩



Record views


Files downloads