Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Est-ce parce qu'ils sont mariés que les hommes mariés gagnent plus que les hommes non-mariés?

Abstract : The economic analysis of marriage poses the hypothesis that, due to the tra-ditional gender-biased specialization within the couple, the husband should receive a wagepremium following marriage. The international empirical literature on the issue howeverseems to challenge this hypothesis. We propose an empirical literature review that showsthat the controversy arises from the fact that part of the observed wage premium is ex-plained by a selection effect, and the premium net of selection is weakly correlated withspecialization. Other explanations could then explain the marriage premium : the discri-mination of employers and a responsibility effect. But the empirical literature relating tothese two alternative approaches is less well-supplied and does not lead to definite conclu-sions : few works clearly identify an effect of discrimination by employers, and articlesadvancing the idea of a responsibility effect, especially in terms of effect of paternity, arenot convergent.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [61 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-02978136
Contributor : Bruno Jeandidier <>
Submitted on : Monday, October 26, 2020 - 2:43:23 PM
Last modification on : Tuesday, October 27, 2020 - 5:29:06 PM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-02978136, version 1

Collections

Citation

Bruno Jeandidier. Est-ce parce qu'ils sont mariés que les hommes mariés gagnent plus que les hommes non-mariés?. L'actualité économique. Revue d'analyse économique, HEC Montréal, 2019, 95 (1), pp.109-145. ⟨hal-02978136⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

9