When experts disagree: the need to rethink indicator selection for assessing sustainability of agriculture

Abstract : Sustainability indicators are well recognized for their potential to assess and monitor sustainable development of agricultural systems. A large number of indicators are proposed in various sustainability assessment frameworks, which raises concerns regarding the validity of approaches, usefulness and trust in such frameworks. Selecting indicators requires transparent and well-defined procedures to ensure the relevance and validity of sustainability assessments. The objective of this study, therefore, was to determine whether
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Environment, Development and Sustainability, Springer Verlag, 2016, 1-16 p. 〈10.1007/s10668-016-9803-x〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-01477805
Contributeur : Lae Ul <>
Soumis le : lundi 27 février 2017 - 16:38:56
Dernière modification le : mercredi 25 juillet 2018 - 13:20:01

Lien texte intégral

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Evelien M. De Olde, Henrik Moller, Fleur Marchand, Richard W. Mcdowell, Catriona J. Macleod, et al.. When experts disagree: the need to rethink indicator selection for assessing sustainability of agriculture. Environment, Development and Sustainability, Springer Verlag, 2016, 1-16 p. 〈10.1007/s10668-016-9803-x〉. 〈hal-01477805〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

98