La césure interprétative entre le juge et la doctrine à la lumière de l’expérience constitutionnelle française : proposition pour une rénovation conceptuelle

Abstract : Since Hans Kelsen, the discourse between judge and doctrine is usually depicted as subject to a scission between these two actors. There should thus be two interpretative spheres out of which the interpretation issued by the judge and the interpretation issued by the doctrine. The aim of the current thesis, present at the junction between the “theorie du droit” and the french constitutional law, is to redefine this interpretative scission and to even go beyond by proposing new sets of rules to explore it. The french constitutional experience enables strengthening the reality of this scission. Short motivations in court decisions, absence of “rapporteur public” and uncertainty of the impact of the constitutional law professors in the french constitutional Council are factors disclosing the existence of this previously mentioned scission between cognition and normativity. However the determination of this scission is impacted as well by a new definition of the legal normativity, being the reason of our willingness in this thesis to go beyond the initial apparent distinction, to propose a redrafting of the constitutional justice structure and to propose the introduction of a new concept, the “pending law”. The above mentioned redrafting and our new concept proposal aim at re-qualifying this scission into a community of jurists which their actor are belonging to notwithstanding their conscience to be part of it. Furthermore, this thesis reflects the existence of the discussion between the judge and the french doctrine but as well the real nature of this discussion
Document type :
Theses
File URL :
http://docnum.univ-lorraine.fr/ulprive/DDOC_T_2017_0380_NOEL.pdf
Complete list of metadatas

https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/tel-02060167
Contributor : Thèses Ul <>
Submitted on : Thursday, March 7, 2019 - 11:24:48 AM
Last modification on : Friday, March 8, 2019 - 1:27:32 AM

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : tel-02060167, version 1

Citation

Johanna Noel. La césure interprétative entre le juge et la doctrine à la lumière de l’expérience constitutionnelle française : proposition pour une rénovation conceptuelle. Droit. Université de Lorraine, 2017. Français. ⟨NNT : 2017LORR0380⟩. ⟨tel-02060167⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

39